Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Guiding policy to reduce the burden of COPD: the role of epidemiological research
Free
  1. Guy B Marks1,2
  1. 1 Respiratory and Environmental Epidemiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
  2. 2 South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Guy B Marks, Respiratory and Environmental Epidemiology, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia; g.marks{at}unsw.edu.au

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

In Thorax, Bhatt and colleagues’ interesting cross-sectional analysis of data from the COPDGene study cohort demonstrates, somewhat unsurprisingly, that the compound (multiplicative) measure of cumulative exposure to tobacco smoking, ‘pack-years’, is a suboptimal index of exposure with respect to effects on indices of airflow obstruction, spirometric lung volume and emphysema.1 This is unsurprising because there is no biological basis for assuming that the effects should be manifest by a simple multiplicative relationship between duration of smoking and estimated average number of cigarettes smoked per day. Compound measures are convenient, but usually not robust, measures for epidemiological investigation. This study confirms that it is almost always more appropriate (and powerful) to analyse the individual components of the exposure separately and to model the interaction between them.

Perhaps more surprising is the near absence of any effect of the estimated …

View Full Text

Linked Articles