Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P272 Improvements in exacerbation rates with single inhaler triple therapy versus dual ics/laba therapy in patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd): subgroup analyses of the phase iii fulfil study
Free
  1. E Hilton1,
  2. N Brealey1,
  3. R Birk1,
  4. C-Q Zhu1,
  5. GJ Criner2,
  6. MT Dransfield3,
  7. D Halpin4,
  8. DA Lomas5,
  9. DA Lipson6
  1. 1GSK, Uxbridge, UK
  2. 2Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, US
  3. 3Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Lung Health Centre, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, US
  4. 4Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
  5. 5UCL Respiratory, University College London, London, UK
  6. 6GSK and Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, King of Prussia and Philadelphia, US

Abstract

Results from FULFIL have shown statistically significant improvements in lung function and health-related quality of life, and a reduction in exacerbation rates with once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100 µg/62.5 µg/25 µg administered using a single ELLIPTA® inhaler compared with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) 400 µg/12 µg using the Turbuhaler® in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations. The safety profile of FF/UMEC/VI reflected that of the components (Lipson, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017). Herein we present post-hoc subgroup analyses of exacerbation rates by prior COPD medication class, disease severity and exacerbation history during FULFIL. In the intent-to-treat (ITT; 24 weeks) population, the mean annual exacerbation rate, FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR ratios and annual exacerbation rates reductions were calculated for subgroups: by prior COPD medication class, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) +long acting beta agonists (LABA); BUD/FOR; ICS +LABA + long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA); LAMA; tiotropium; LAMA +LABA; by disease severity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <50% predicted, no moderate/severe exacerbation; FEV1 <50%,≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation; FEV1 ≥50–≤80%,≥2 moderate or ≥1 severe exacerbations; and by exacerbation history, 0/1 moderate exacerbations;≥2 moderate exacerbations;≥1 severe exacerbation. Up to Week 24 in the ITT population, FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR improved the mean annual exacerbation rate (range, 63%–24%) in all prior medication subgroups, except LAMA +LABA (annual exacerbation rate reduction, −44%) and improved mean annual exacerbation rates in all disease severity (range, 45%–27%) and exacerbation prior history (range, 57%–27%) subgroups (Table). Statistical significance of the FF/UMEC/VI:BUD/FOR ratio was observed for the subgroups: prior medication class ICS +LABA (0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20–0.71; p=0.003) and ICS +LAMA + LABA (0.53; 95% CI 0.33–0.87; p=0.012); disease severity FEV1 <50% and≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation (0.55; 0.34–0.89; p=0.015); exacerbation history 0/1 prior moderate exacerbation (0.62; 0.44 0.87; p=0.005) and ≥1 prior severe exacerbation (0.43; 0.22 0.86; p=0.017) (Table). Improvements in mean annual exacerbation rates with once-daily FF/UMEC/VI compared with twice-daily BUD/FOR were observed in all patients regardless of disease severity or exacerbation history and all prior COPD medication class subgroups except for LAMA +LABA.

Funding GSK (NCT02345161; CTT116853)

Please refer to page A260 for declarations of interest in relation to abstract P272.

Abstract P272 Table 1

Mean annual exacerbation rates by subgroup (ITT population; up to Week 24)

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.