Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P249 It is possible to detect active neutrophil elastase in exhaled breath condensate of patients with cystic fibrosis
  1. C Edmondson1,2,
  2. R Murphy1,
  3. K Moffitt3,
  4. D Ribeiro3,
  5. EWFW Alton1,2,4,
  6. JC Davies1,2,4
  1. 1NHLI Imperial College London, London, UK
  2. 2Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
  3. 3ProAxsis Ltd, Belfast, UK
  4. 4UK CF Gene Therapy Consortium London, London, UK

Abstract

Introduction CF is characterised by chronic progressive respiratory decline punctuated with periods of acute pulmonary exacerbations (PEx). Given the relationship between PEx number and chronic rate of decline and that ~25% of PEx patients fail to regain their baseline FEV1, there remains a need for a reliable biomarker to predict PEx and/or monitor responses to treatment. Several biomarkers have been explored, including sputum Neutrophil Elastase (NE). However, any sputum-based biomarker will only be suitable for patients able to expectorate, whereas significant disease begins earlier in life. Previously, our group (Thorax 2013;68: 532–9) reported the change of physiological, functional and structural markers over a PEx within which we collected exhaled breath condensate (EBC). These samples were analysed with a newly-developed immunoassay; detection of NE would offer the potential to detect airway inflammation in non-expectorating subjects.

Methods EBC was collected using an Ecoscreen condenser, stored at −80°C, and then analysed using the ProteaseTag® Active Neutrophil Elastase Immunoassay (ProAxsis Ltd).

Results 35 EBC samples from 19 participants were available. Participants were 12–44 years; 10 female. Median FEV1% predicted was 52.5% (IQR 43.75%–74.8%). All had chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection apart from 1 who had chronic Burkholderia cepacia complex infection. NE could be detected (≥LLD 7.2 ng/ml) in 28 of 35 samples (80%). For the whole group, median concentration was 15.45 ng/ml (IQR 10.36–19.02 ng/ml).

Discussion This was a small, pilot study seeking to demonstrate the feasibility of measuring active NE in EBC and successfully reporting, for the first time to our knowledge, detectable levels of this inflammatory marker. However, levels were near the lower end of detection of the immunoassay; therefore development of a more sensitive assay could be helpful. Further work is needed to establish CF/non-CF differences and the relevance of levels to accepted measures of airway disease. The use of EBC could allow monitoring of airway inflammation at the early stages of CF lung disease when patients cannot expectorate sputum, and during a period in their disease progression when the potential impact of interventions on long term outcomes may be greatest.

Supported by ProAxsis Ltd and the CF Trust UK

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.