Article Text

Download PDFPDF

S15 Improving the risk stratification for malignancy in small pulmonary nodules from an unselected patient population
Free
  1. A Talwar1,
  2. JMY Willaime2,
  3. N Rahman1,
  4. M Gooding2,
  5. T Kadir3,
  6. F Gleeson1
  1. 1Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
  2. 2Mirada Medical Ltd, Oxford, UK
  3. 3Optellum Ltd, Oxford, UK

Abstract

Introduction Distinguishing between benign and malignant small pulmonary nodules (PNs) detected on CT scanning is a significant challenge. Such nodules are commonly detected in clinical practice as incidental findings or in patients with a history of prior malignancy. CT texture analysis (CTTA) has been proposed as a potential imaging biomarker in tumour characterisation. Image texture refers to the statistical analysis of spatial intensity variations of the pixels within an image to produce a CT texture score. This score is then mapped onto a probability of malignancy from 0–1.

Aims and Objectives

  • To create a registry of patients with small solid PNs from an unselected population of patients.

  • Patient demographic data were combined with information acquired from CT derived parameters such as shape, size, and texture analysis (CTTA) to develop and validate a generalised linear model to determine the probability of malignancy of PNs.

  • A parallel prospective interventional cohort study was also conducted to assess whether CTTA repeatability was comparable to automatic volumetric measurements when a patient is scanned twice on the same day.

Methods Between January 2012 to September 2014, 1008 patients presenting with small solid PNs were identified. The gold standard diagnosis of the nodules was established by histology or nodule stability at 2 years of CT follow-up.

Results The prevalence of malignant PNs was 31.6% (319/1008). Significant independent predictors of malignancy included prior history of malignancy within 5 years (OR=117.4,(95% confidence interval(CI)):67.1 to 272.8, p<0.001); larger nodule diameter (OR=9.7, CI: 4.1 to 17.6, p<0.001); nodule count (OR=1.6, CI:1.3 to 1.8, p<0.001) and nodule spiculation (OR=118.4, CI:61.9 to 772.3, p<0.001). The models’ performance using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.969. When CTTA was used alone the AUC was 0.800 (figure 1). CTTA displayed ULR and LLR below ±17.8%, comparable to volume using Bland-Altman and also had high repeatability {CCC (0.84≤CCC≤0.99)}.

Conclusion This study has highlighted the potential clinical utility of CTTA in the risk stratification of PNs. It has also shown that CTTA is a highly repeatable imaging biomarker of malignancy, akin to volume measurements but with the advantage of not requiring imaging follow-up.

Abstract S15 Figure 1

(A) Patient demographics and nodule characteristics, (B) Performance of clinical models (AUC is area under the ROC curve), and (C) Bland-altman plot to show variability in texture feature scores and volumetry for 40 Pulmonary nodules.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.