Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P69 Functionality, reliability, and performance of an accessorised pre-filled syringe with home-administered subcutaneous benralizumab for adult patients with severe asthma
Free
  1. AH Mansur1,
  2. GT Ferguson2,
  3. JS Jacobs3,
  4. J Hebert4,
  5. C Clawson5,
  6. W Tao6,
  7. Y Wu6,
  8. M Goldman6
  9. on behalf of the GREGALE study investigators
  1. 1Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills, MI, US
  3. 3Allergy and Asthma Clinical Research, Walnut Creek, CA, US
  4. 4Centre de Recherche Appliqué en Allergie de Québec, Québec, QC, Canada
  5. 5MedImmune LLC, Gaithersburg, MD, US
  6. 6AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, US

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives Benralizumab, a humanised anti-eosinophil monoclonal antibody, is in development as an add-on treatment for severe, uncontrolled, eosinophilic asthma. During Phase III trials, benralizumab significantly reduced annual asthma exacerbation rates and was well-tolerated.1,2 The GREGALE study (NCT02417961) assessed patient and caregiver-reported functionality, performance, and reliability of an accessorised pre-filled syringe (APFS) used to administer benralizumab subcutaneously in an at-home setting.

Methods Patients (n=116) with severe, uncontrolled asthma despite receiving medium- or high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting β2-agonists, received up to five APFS-administered subcutaneous doses (Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16) of 30 mg benralizumab. The first three doses were administered at the study sites. The patient/caregiver administered the last two doses at home. Endpoints included the percentage of patients/caregivers who successfully administered benralizumab at home, percentage of APFS returned to study sites and evaluated as functional, percentage of APFS returned as malfunctioning to Product Complaints, efficacy (Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 [ACQ-6]), safety, and pharmacodynamics (blood eosinophil count).

Results Nearly all patients and caregivers successfully administered benralizumab with an APFS at home (Week 12: 112/114, 98%; Week 16: 108/109, 99%; figure 1). Two at-home administrations were unsuccessful because of patient-use error. One APFS was recorded as nonfunctional because it was not returned for evaluation. Product Complaints identified only 1 APFS malfunction of 573 dispensed. Mean ACQ-6 scores decreased from baseline through all postbaseline time points through end of treatment (baseline: mean 2.14 [standard deviation {SD} 0.81]; Week 20: mean 1.40 [SD 0.90]). Near-complete depletion of eosinophils was observed at end of treatment vs. baseline (baseline: median 250 cells/µL [interquartile range {IQR} 175–430 cells/µL]; and Week 20: median 0 cells/µL [IQR 0–10 cells/µL]). Incidence of adverse events leading to benralizumab discontinuation was 2.6%. Most common adverse events (≥5% of patients) were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, and sinusitis. Five patients (4.3%) experienced transient mild or moderate injection-site reactions.

Abstract P69 Figure 1

Percentage of patients and caregivers who used an APFS successfully at home and returned APFS evaluated as functional.

Conclusions Most patients and caregivers successfully administered benralizumab in an at-home setting. The APFS was functional, reliable, and performed well.

Please refer to page A258 for declarations of interest in relation to abstract P69.

References

  1. Bleecker ERet al. Lancet2016;388:2115–27.

  2. FitzGerald JMet al. Lancet2016;388:2128–41.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.