Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Journal club summaries
What’s hot that the other lot got
  1. Rebecca F D’Cruz
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rebecca F D’Cruz, Lane Fox Respiratory Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 9RT, UK; rebecca.dcruz{at}gstt.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

New definitions for weaning for mechanically ventilated patients: the WIND study

Weaning from mechanical ventilation is an ill-defined process. The 2007 International Consensus Conference (ICC) weaning definition is difficult to apply as it uses spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) which are not universally used and excludes tracheostomised patients and those who fail to wean or die. In this prospective, multinational observational study, Béduneau et al propose a weaning classification for utilisation in daily practice for all mechanically ventilated patients (Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:772–83). 2709 intubated patients from 36 European intensive care units (ICUs) were observed until ICU discharge or day 60. The authors propose a classification based on weaning duration from first separation attempt (extubation or SBT in intubated patients or ≥24 hours spontaneous ventilation in tracheostomised patients). Group ‘no weaning’ (24%) had no separation attempt; group 1 (57%) weaned in <1 day (mortality 5%); group 2 (10%) weaned in >1 and <7 days (mortality 15%), group 3 (9%) had a weaning duration of ≥7 days (mortality 30%). Group 3 was divided into 3a (completed wean after ≥7 days, 62%) and …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.