Article Text

Download PDFPDF

P13 The rationale for setting up a dedicated pleural procedure list: benefits for patients and trusts
  1. C Brockelsby,
  2. A Wells,
  3. P Deegan,
  4. W Kent,
  5. C Houghton,
  6. M Gautam
  1. Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK


Introduction and objectives Pleural disease contributes to a significant proportion of acute admissions and hospital bed-days. Traditionally, patients presenting with pleural effusion, were admitted for management, including patients with terminal disease.

In May 2014, we designed one of the first dedicated pleural procedure lists regionally allowing patients to undergo procedures on a day-case basis.

A dedicated pleural procedure room was established for a weekly session to accommodate a maximum of 5 pleural procedures. The list was consultant-delivered by a level 2 thoracic ultrasound-trained Consultant, with built in consultant cross-cover to prevent cancellation. An electronic referral system, pleural procedure patient pathway and WHO procedural checklist was designed to be completed for each case to maximise patient safety and efficiency. Dedicated nursing was provided to enhance patient experience and multi-professional development. The list provided weekly opportunity for education/training for those wishing to gain ultrasound certification and procedural competency-based assessment.

This study looked at the impact of acute service redesign.

Methods This was a review of a prospectively maintained database of a weekly pleural procedure list, from May 2014–May 2016. Comparison was made with data obtained from previous local audit, including LOS pre and post introduction of the new service.

Results 398 patients were referred over 2 years; 178 outpatients, 200 inpatients. On average, 4 pleural procedures/ultrasound were performed per session. A total of 3738 bed days were saved, based on an average LOS of 22 days for patients previously admitted with pleural effusions, demonstrated by audit pre-2014. In 178 cases, due to the ambulatory nature of the introduced service, average LOS was reduced from 22 to 1 day. There have been no reported adverse events since set-up, and additional income has been generated by receiving a day-case best practice tariff (BPT), introduced in 2013/14.

Conclusion Service innovation resulting in a dedicated hospital pleural procedure list has resulted in demonstrable benefits for patients in terms of LOS, patient safety and experience. Our set up has generated recurrent financial gains through bed day savings, created a regional hub for US training and confirmed the commendable merits of ambulatory care for patients requiring pleural procedures.

Abstract P13 Table 1

LOS and cost savings from day case procedures: Based on average LOS of 22 days for patients admitted with pleural effusions in 2013

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.