You are here

Article Text

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Disease Progression and Burden in Obstructive Lung Disease
P139 The burden of copd across the european union: development of the european copd atlas
Free
  1. JFM van Boven1,
  2. J Gaughan1,
  3. JB Soriano2,
  4. J Correia de Sousa3,
  5. N Baxter4,
  6. M Román-Rodríguez5,
  7. J Vilaró6,
  8. S Williams7,
  9. S Fitch8,
  10. K Kishore9,
  11. H Chaudhury9
  1. 1European COPD Coalition, Brussels, Belgium
  2. 2Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario de la Princesa (IISP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
  3. 3Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Health Sciences, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, ICVS/3B’s – PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal
  4. 4NHS Southwark Clinical Commissioning Group, London, UK
  5. 5Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de las Islas Baleres (IdISPa) Balearic Health Service, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  6. 6Department of Physiotherapy, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain
  7. 7International Primary Care Respiratory Group, Westhill, UK
  8. 8Fundación Lovexair, Madrid, Spain
  9. 9Health IQ, London, UK

Abstract

Background Estimating current and future impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) within the European Union (EU) is essential for targeted and well-informed policy-making, however, current global and regional estimates are contradictory, and comparable standardised data is lacking. Without it the burden felt by individuals and healthcare systems cannot be fully quantified and a collective and coordinated response cannot be achieved to protect economies and communities from further harm.

Aim Our purpose was to

  • Collect data to enable a comparative assessment of the COPD burden across EU 28 member states and highlight variation.

  • Show the impact of COPD in the workplace, on healthcare utilisation and on quality of life of the EU population.

  • Use the data to underpin a simulation model to demonstrate future impact on societies, health inequalities and healthcare utilisation depending on which interventions are selected.

Methods A systematic literature review was performed to identify regional and national data on COPD prevalence, risk factors (e.g. smoking, air pollution), impact and costs across the EU. Workshops with stakeholders from a range of European countries were convened to test the face validity of the data, and to develop policy-level questions from which a simulation model could be developed.

Results Prevalence estimates of COPD varied considerably (1.26% to 13.87%), partly because of different definitions. As smoking rates are less affected by definition differences, these were used in a model that predicts COPD incidence, prevalence and mortality. Correction factors were applied to account for non-smoking related causes and under diagnosis of smoking. Smoking prevalence rates were used to estimate data for equivalent countries for the countries where smoking data were not available. The simulation model is currently in development and first results are expected in Autumn 2016.

Conclusion The European COPD Coalition (ECC) will use the results to facilitate dialogue with EU decision makers (European Commission Council and Parliament) on health policy, outlining the problem and providing evidence to support the call for political actions on COPD. It will also be of significant interest to healthcare professionals, patients, and respiratory organisations with a passion to improve COPD care

https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209333.282

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.