Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Original article
Inspiratory muscle training to enhance recovery from mechanical ventilation: a randomised trial
  1. Bernie M Bissett1,2,3,
  2. I Anne Leditschke4,5,6,
  3. Teresa Neeman7,
  4. Robert Boots1,8,
  5. Jennifer Paratz1,8,9
  1. 1School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2Discipline of Physiotherapy, University of Canberra, Australia
  3. 3Physiotherapy Department, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  4. 4Intensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  5. 5Intensive Care Unit, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  6. 6School of Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  7. 7Statistical Consulting Unit, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  8. 8Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  9. 9School of Alllied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Bernie Bissett, Department of Physiotherapy Department, Building 15, Canberra Hospital, Yamba Drive, Garran, Canberra ACT 2605, Australia; Bernie.Bissett{at}act.gov.au

Abstract

Background In patients who have been mechanically ventilated, inspiratory muscles remain weak and fatigable following ventilatory weaning, which may contribute to dyspnoea and limited functional recovery. Inspiratory muscle training may improve inspiratory muscle strength and endurance following weaning, potentially improving dyspnoea and quality of life in this patient group.

Methods We conducted a randomised trial with assessor-blinding and intention-to-treat analysis. Following 48 hours of successful weaning, 70 participants (mechanically ventilated ≥7 days) were randomised to receive inspiratory muscle training once daily 5 days/week for 2 weeks in addition to usual care, or usual care (control). Primary endpoints were inspiratory muscle strength and fatigue resistance index (FRI) 2 weeks following enrolment. Secondary endpoints included dyspnoea, physical function and quality of life, post-intensive care length of stay and in-hospital mortality.

Results 34 participants were randomly allocated to the training group and 36 to control. The training group demonstrated greater improvements in inspiratory strength (training: 17%, control: 6%, mean difference: 11%, p=0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in FRI (0.03 vs 0.02, p=0.81), physical function (0.25 vs 0.25, p=0.97) or dyspnoea (−0.5 vs 0.2, p=0.22). Improvement in quality of life was greater in the training group (14% vs 2%, mean difference 12%, p=0.03). In-hospital mortality was higher in the training group (4 vs 0, 12% vs 0%, p=0.051).

Conclusions Inspiratory muscle training following successful weaning increases inspiratory muscle strength and quality of life, but we cannot confidently rule out an associated increased risk of in-hospital mortality.

Trial registration number ACTRN12610001089022, results.

  • Respiratory Muscles
  • Exercise
  • Respiratory Measurement

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles