Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Is rehabilitation post critical illness a new anti-inflammatory agent?
  1. Doug Elliott1,
  2. Zudin Puthucheary2
  1. 1Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  2. 2Institute of Health and Human Performance, University College London, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Doug Elliott, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia; Doug.Elliott{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Physical recovery following a critical illness is important for patients, family and clinicians.1–3 However, there is limited beneficial effect demonstrated from the intervention studies that have investigated physical rehabilitation across the continuum of critical illness recovery, starting in the intensive care unit (ICU) and continuing to the community setting with home-based rehabilitation and follow-up clinics4–8 What is the reason for this lack of treatment effect? As with all trials that show a lack of effect, we must consider a number of factors, including the intervention delivered, the target population and the outcome measure used.

In the recent RECOVER trial,8 there was an improvement in the functional status of patients following critical illness, as evidenced by the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI); however, the delivery of a post-ICU bundled therapies intervention did not enhance the physical outcome over and above the normal trajectory of recovery. As there was clear demonstration that the treatment was delivered, this raises the question of whether the target population was appropriate and, in particular, whether we can identify cohorts of patients that are more or less likely to respond to rehabilitation treatment.

In Thorax, Griffith et al9 report an a …

View Full Text


  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Critical care
    David M Griffith Steff Lewis Adriano G Rossi Jillian Rennie Lisa Salisbury Judith L Merriweather Kate Templeton Timothy S Walsh RECOVER Investigators RECOVER Investigators T S Walsh L G Salisbury J L Merriweather J A Boyd D M Griffith G Huby S Kean S J Mackenzie A Krishan S C Lewis G D Murray J F Forbes J Smith J E Rattray A M Hull P Ramsay C Wallis J Stewart A Bateman E Wilson M Gillies D Hope H Dawson C McCulloch J Antonelli L Boardman L Dow W Williams A McCann S Alexander J Norrie M Dennis C Waldmann S Brett
  • Airwaves
    The Triumvirate