Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Images in thorax
The value of sound waves and pleural manometry in diagnosing a pleural effusion with the dual diagnosis
  1. Amit Chopra1,
  2. Rahul Argula2,
  3. Christopher Schaefer3,
  4. Marc A Judson1,
  5. Terrill Huggins2
  1. 1Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
  2. 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
  3. 3Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Amit Chopra, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Albany Medical College, 47 New Scotland Avenue, Albany, NY 12208-3479, USA; chopraa1{at}mail.amc.edu

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Case

An 83-year-old woman presented with a recurrent, right-sided pleural effusion. She had undergone three large volume thoracentesis in the past 2 years, which revealed a ‘clear appearing’ transudative effusion. She had a remote history of haemothorax, a complication from dual chamber pacemaker placement. A chest radiograph (figure 1A) showed a moderate sized, right pleural effusion. Pleural ultrasonography revealed an anechoic fluid collection. Approximately 1.2 L of yellow fluid was removed during thoracentesis. Pleural manometry performed during the thoracentesis revealed a biphasic pressure-volume (P-V) curve showing a steep increase in pleural space elastance at the terminal stages of drainage suggesting an unexpandable lung (figure 2). An air-contrast chest CT scan (figure 1B) showed abnormal visceral pleural thickening consistent with a …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors TH is the guarantor of the paper, and takes responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to published article. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.