Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Images in thorax
Symptomatic accessory cardiac bronchus in an infant
  1. A Fina1,
  2. M Baqué-Juston2,
  3. M Guesmi2,
  4. M Albertini1,3,
  5. L Giovannini-Chami1,3
  1. 1Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology Department, Hôpitaux pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France
  2. 2Paediatric Radiology Department, Hôpitaux pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, Nice, France
  3. 3Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
  1. Correspondence to Dr Lisa Giovannini-Chami, Paediatric Pneumology and Allergology Department, Hôpitaux pédiatriques de Nice CHU-Lenval, 57 Avenue de la Californie, Nice 06200, France; giovannini-chami.l{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

A 13-month-old infant was referred for evaluation of a severe, therapy-resistant asthma. He presented with daily wheezing, recurrent acute exacerbations, chronic dry-to-wet cough and failure to thrive. His mother had severe allergic asthma with recent admission to the intensive care unit. Initial chest X-rays were normal and skin prick tests were negative. It was decided to undertake a comprehensive work-up to exclude differential diagnoses. Paediatric radiologists initially interpreted the chest CT scan as normal. Bronchoscopic examination revealed an accessory cardiac bronchus (ACB) originating from the medial wall of the intermediate bronchus and filled with purulent secretions (108 Haemophilus influenzae and 108 Moraxella catarrhalis on bronchoalveolar lavage). The lesion was observed on re-examination of the CT scan (figure 1A, B) and demonstrated using three-dimensional (3D) virtual bronchoscopy and surface-rendered reconstructions (figure …

View Full Text


  • Contributors AF, MA and LGC drafted the manuscript. MG and MBJ provided CT scan reconstructions. LGC made special contributions to critical review of the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.