Introduction A service evaluation investigated the effect of follow-up in secondary care on the outcomes of patients who had suffered a Pulmonary Embolism (PE). Patients who attended the PE clinic received a tailored treatment plan specific to their PE event. Events were classified as provoked or unprovoked and their 2 year recurrence rates and complications assessed.
Method The 2012 cohort of 84 patients from a PE clinic was analysed retrospectively, allowing for a 2 year follow-up. Patients were classified as having sustained a provoked event if a transient provoking risk factor was identified, as per the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2014 guidelines.
Results Of the 84 patients (40 male, 44 female), 83 were available for follow-up at the 2 year mark. Fifty patients (59.5%) had a provoked event whilst 32 (38.1%) were unprovoked- 2 patients had inadequate history to assess. Patients with unprovoked events were investigated further to screen for an underlying malignancy. Three patients (9.38%) were diagnosed with malignancies within 6 months of their PE. Of the unprovoked, 26 underwent a thrombophilia screen with 4 (12.5%) testing positive. Of 83 patients followed to 2 years, 7 (8.4%) had a recurrence (median = 17 months). Two (2.4%) developed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension whilst 3 (3.6%) developed post-thrombotic syndrome.
Conclusion Compared to the ESC 2014 guidelines, recurrence rates and complications at 2 years are much lower. The classification of provoked and unprovoked events led to the diagnosis of unknown pathologies. Although only an initial study, this shows that secondary follow-up decreases adverse consequences.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.