You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
PostScript
Correspondence
Response to: 'Conventional bronchoscopic techniques in sarcoidosis: not too far behind’ by Dhooria et al
  1. Robert C Rintoul1,
  2. Rawya Ahmed1,
  3. Brendan Dougherty1,
  4. Nicholas R Carroll2
  1. 1Department of Thoracic Oncology, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, UK
  2. 2Department of Radiology, Cambridge University NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Robert Rintoul, Department of Thoracic Oncology, Papworth Hospital, Cambridge CB23 3RE, UK; Robert.rintoul{at}nhs.net

https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-206994

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    We thank Dhooria et al1 for their complimentary comments on our review article about linear endobronchial ultrasound.2 We congratulate them on their carefully performed randomised controlled trial comparing endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in conjunction with transbronchial lung biopsies (TBLB) and endobronchial biopsies (EBB) with conventional non-ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (cTBNA) in conjunction with TBLB and EBB for the diagnosis …

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Contributors RCR wrote the letter on behalf of the other authors who have reviewed it.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

    Linked Articles