Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Rhinovirus-induced interferon production in asthma
  1. Simonetta Baraldo1,
  2. Marina Saetta1,
  3. Angelo Barbato2,
  4. Marco Contoli3,
  5. Alberto Papi3
  1. 1 Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  2. 2 Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
  3. 3 Department of Medical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Simonetta Baraldo, Department of Cardiological, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences Respiratory Diseases Clinic, University of Padova, Via Giustiniani 3, Padova 35128, Italy; simonetta.baraldo{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

After reading the article by Sykes et al,1 we would like to comment on impaired response to rhinovirus in relation to asthma severity. The authors examined rhinovirus-induced interferon (IFN) production in a cohort of asthmatic patients compared with controls. While they previously reported in this population a reduced IFN production in cells from bronchoalveolar lavage,2 they fail to document such an impaired response in bronchial epithelial cells.1 The authors propose to ascribe such discrepancy to asthma severity, since epithelial cells successfully cultured derived from a subset of patients with milder clinical manifestations. However, (1) the authors cannot conclude on IFN production in most severe patients who were not examined in this study; (2) the cohort on the whole did not cover all the spectrum of disease severity, with most patients having mild/moderate asthma; (3) impaired IFN production has been previously documented in epithelial cells cultured from well-controlled asthmatic patients.3 ,4

To substantiate the confinement of defective IFN production upon rhinovirus infection to the more severe expressions of the disease the authors quote their recent paper in severe therapy-resistant asthmatic children.5 However, we recently found a defective IFN induction and increased viral replication in bronchial epithelial cells of preschool children with mild asthma.6 None of the children in our report were treated with oral or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, the majority of them receiving only inhaled rescue salbutamol. Even more compelling is our finding of similar innate immune impairments in atopic children without symptoms of asthma. Clearly, our results suggest that asthma severity is not an issue closely related with IFN responses to rhinovirus infection. Of note, we also reported that rhinovirus-induced IFN production in epithelial cells was inversely related to IL-4 expression and eosinophil counts in bronchial biopsies, suggesting that Th2 inflammatory milieu, rather than asthma severity, is tightly linked with impaired innate immune responses to rhinovirus.



  • Contributors SB, MS, AB, MC and AP conceived and drafted this manuscript.

  • Funding Work supported by the Universities of Padova and Ferrara and the Italian Society of Pediatric Respiratory Diseases.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles