Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
Author's response to ‘Complete (EBUS and EUS) endosonographic staging of lung cancer’
  1. Bin Hwangbo,
  2. Hyo Jae Kang
  1. Correspondence to Dr B Hwangbo, Center for Lung Cancer, National Cancer Center, 323 Ilsan-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 410-769, Korea; hbb{at}ncc.re.kr

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We thank Dr Annema1 for his thoughtful comments on our article published online in Thorax.2 We observed a significant diagnostic benefit from endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) following endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the mediastinal staging of potentially operable lung cancer. We believe that our finding is based on differences in EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA accessibility to the mediastinum. Additional benefits of EBUS-TBNA in the EUS-centred group were mainly obtained from targeting inaccessible nodes by EUS (2R or 4R). Subcarinal nodes are generally accessible by EUS; however, some parts may not be covered by EUS. Among four metastatic subcarinal nodes diagnosed only by EBUS in the EUS-centred group, the right sides of the subcarinal nodes were not well visualised by EUS in three cases (figure 1). In one patient, performing EUS-FNA on subcarinal nodes was difficult due to a haematoma that developed following the sampling of the 4 L nodes. Of the four cases, two cases were …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors BH and HJK were responsible for data interpretation and manuscript writing.

  • Funding This work was supported by National Cancer Center Grant 1110570.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles