Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
The British Thoracic Society guideline on pulmonary rehabilitation in adults: your opinion is noted
  1. Charlotte E Bolton1,
  2. John D Blakey2,
  3. Mike D Morgan3,
  4. on behalf of the BTS Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guideline Development Group for the Standards of Care Committee for the BTS
  1. 1 Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2 Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
  3. 3 Respiratory Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Charlotte Bolton, Nottingham Respiratory Research Unit, The University of Nottingham, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; charlotte.bolton{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We thank Professors McConnell and Gosselink for their interest in the British Thoracic Society (BTS) pulmonary rehabilitation guideline.1 ,2 We welcome the opportunity to highlight the robust, unbiased approach that the guideline development group (GDG) has followed in making their recommendations which have been accredited by National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. This process, according to the BTS production manual, is described in the guideline methodology.2 It included initial training, each article being considered by at least two GDG members, independent peer review at multiple stages and consultation periods for …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors CEB, JDB and MDM contributed to the writing of the letter and approved the final version.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles