Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Journal policy on research funded by the tobacco industry
  1. Fiona Godlee,
  2. Ruth Malone,
  3. Adam Timmis,
  4. Catherine Otto,
  5. Andrew Bush,
  6. Ian Pavord,
  7. Trish Groves
  1. BMJ, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Trish Groves, BMJ, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9JR, UK; tgroves{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

As editors of the BMJ, Heart, Thorax and BMJ Open, we have decided that the journals will no longer consider for publication any study that is partly or wholly funded by the tobacco industry. Our new policy is consistent with those of other journals including PLoS Medicine, PLoS One, PLoS Biology;1 Journal of Health Psychology;2 journals published by the American Thoracic Society;3 and the BMJ's own Tobacco Control.4

Critics may argue—as many did when journals stopped publishing cigarette advertisements—that publishing such research does not constitute endorsing its findings and that, as long as funding sources are fully disclosed, readers can consider that information and make up their own minds about the quality of the work. Peer review should prevail, goes this line of thinking: it's not the editor's job to make these kinds of judgments. However, this view ignores the growing body of evidence that biases and research misconduct are often impossible …

View Full Text


  • This article is being copublished as an editorial in the BMJ, Heart and Thorax, and as a blog in BMJ Open.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • Airwaves
    Andrew Bush Ian Pavord