Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Limited generalisability of UPLIFT findings to clinical practice
  1. Steven Walker1,2,
  2. James Fingleton1,2,3,
  3. Mark Weatherall2,4,
  4. Richard Beasley1,2,3,4
  1. 1Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand
  2. 2Capital & Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
  3. 3Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
  4. 4Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to Professor Richard Beasley, Medical Research Institute of New Zealand, Private Bag 7902, Wellington 6242, New Zealand; Richard.Beasley{at}mrinz.ac.nz

Abstract

Background The findings of the Understanding Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT) study may be poorly generalisable to tiotropium use in clinical practice.

Methods An audit of 226 patients admitted to Wellington Hospital with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation determined the proportion of patients prescribed tiotropium on discharge that would have been ineligible for inclusion in the UPLIFT study.

Results Among 100 patients prescribed tiotropium, 38/100; 38% (95% CI 28.5% to 48.3%) would have been ineligible for UPLIFT at the time of the hospital discharge due to recent cardiovascular comorbidity or moderate to severe renal impairment.

Conclusions The UPLIFT findings have limited generalisability to over a third of patients prescribed tiotropium following a hospital admission with a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation in New Zealand.

  • COPD Pharmacology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles