Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Continuous measures of driving performance on an advanced office-based driving simulator can be used to predict simulator task failure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome
  1. Dipansu Ghosh1,
  2. Samantha L Jamson2,
  3. Paul D Baxter3,
  4. Mark W Elliott1
  1. 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, St James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
  2. 2Safety and Technology Group, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  3. 3Division of Biostatistics, LIGHT, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mark W Elliott, Consultant Respiratory Physician, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sleep and Non-invasive Ventilation Services, St James' University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; mark.elliott{at}leedsth.nhs.uk

Abstract

Introduction Some patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome are at higher risk of being involved in road traffic accidents. It has not been possible to identify this group from clinical and polysomnographic information or using simple simulators. We explore the possibility of identifying this group from variables generated in an advanced PC-based driving simulator.

Methods All patients performed a 90 km motorway driving simulation. Two events were programmed to trigger evasive actions, one subtle and an alert driver should not crash, while for the other, even a fully alert driver might crash. Simulator parameters including standard deviation of lane position (SDLP) and reaction times at the veer event (VeerRT) were recorded. There were three possible outcomes: ‘fail’, ‘indeterminate’ and ‘pass’. An exploratory study identified the simulator parameters predicting a ‘fail’ by regression analysis and this was then validated prospectively.

Results 72 patients were included in the exploratory phase and 133 patients in the validation phase. 65 (32%) patients completed the run without any incidents, 45 (22%) failed, 95 (46%) were indeterminate. Prediction models using SDLP and VeerRT could predict ‘fails’ with a sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 96%. The models were subsequently confirmed in the validation phase.

Conclusions Using continuously measured variables it has been possible to identify, with a high degree of accuracy, a subset of patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome who fail a simulated driving test. This has the potential to identify at-risk drivers and improve the reliability of a clinician's decision-making.

  • Sleep apnoea

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding The study was partly supported by an unrestricted grant from ResMed for healthcare assistant time to supervise simulator runs.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patients consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval NHS Research Ethics Committee, York.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.