Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Inflammometry: the current state of play
  1. Ian D Pavord1,
  2. Peter G Gibson2
  1. 1Institute for Lung Health, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
  2. 2Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Centre for Asthma and Respiratory Diseases, Hunter Medical Research Institute at John Hunter Hospital, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Professor Ian D Pavord, Consultant Physician and Honorary Professor of Medicine, Institute for Lung Health, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester LE3 9QP, UK; ian.pavord{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

It is now 20 years since the late Freddy Hargreave and colleagues developed a valid, safe and feasible technique to assess airway inflammation using induced sputum.1–3 At around the same time Kjell Alving and colleagues reported that the concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) is raised in patients with asthma.4 There has since been huge research interest in these techniques over the last 20 years and both are increasingly used in clinical practice. This has lead to a number of key and often unexpected observations which have changed the way we think about inflammatory airway disease. First, the presence of eosinophilic airway inflammation, regarded as a sine qua non of asthma, is neither closely related to the pattern nor to the severity of airway dysfunction or symptoms.5–7 Second, the presence of eosinophilic airway inflammation is more closely associated with a positive response to corticosteroids than other more traditional clinical measures, irrespective of the pattern of disease it occurs in.7–10 Thus, if the clinical question is should a patient with symptoms suggesting airway disease receive corticosteroid treatment (and it often is), then the identification of eosinophilic airway inflammation would be a better basis for making this decision than categorising the patient or applying other tests. Third, a raised FENO level appears to be just as good an indicator of a positive response to corticosteroids in a heterogeneous …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles