Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Correspondence
Authors' response: exposing children to secondhand smoke
Free
  1. John Britton,
  2. Jo Leonardi-Bee
  1. UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jo Leonardi-Bee, UK Centre for Tobacco Control Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK; jo.leonardi-bee{at}nottingham.ac.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Pool and colleagues make an important point about exposure to tobacco smoke1 but we are uncertain of the relevance to our paper,2 which reported the effects of smoking by parents as a behaviour rather than source of passive exposure. While we cannot discount the possibility that children of smokers are more likely to become smokers as a consequence of passive smoke exposure, our interpretation is that it is the behaviour that is responsible.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Linked article 201607.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • PostScript
    Jenny Pool Natalya Petrova Robert Ross Russell