Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Authors' response
  1. D C Cowan1,
  2. D R Taylor2
  1. 1University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
  2. 2University of Otago Medical School, Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand
  1. Correspondence to D C Cowan, University of Otago, PO Box 913, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand; douglas.cowan{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We are grateful to Dr Martin et al for their comments, and accept that our study had certain design limitations. The data were obtained during the run-in for another study (Cowan et al, Thorax Published Online First: 23 September 2010. doi:10.1136/thx.2010.144592). However, the principal finding remains: while we agree that the presence of airway eosinophilia is a reliable predictor of steroid responsiveness, the absence of eosinophilia does not accurately predict steroid unresponsiveness. Whether intentionally or not, these authors imply that only patients with demonstrable sputum eosinophilia are steroid responsive. This is not the case.


  • Linked article 144592

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles