Guidelines on contraindications for lung function tests have been based on expert opinion from >30 years ago. High-risk contraindications to lung function testing are associated with cardiovascular complications such as myocardial infarct, pulmonary embolism or ascending aortic aneurysm. Slightly less risky but still serious contraindications are predominantly centred on recovery from major thoracic, abdominal or head surgery. Less serious surgical procedures will present a possible risk, but the RR depends upon whether the lung function is essential or can wait until the patient's condition improves. In recent decades there have been moves towards less invasive surgical techniques, keyhole surgery and new technology such as laser surgery which minimise the amount of collateral damage to surrounding tissues. In thoracic surgery there is a shift in emphasis to quicker postsurgical mobility. Furthermore there has been little analysis of the scientific facts behind the current recommendations and contraindications. The principle absolute and relative contraindications are in need of revision, and recommended times of abstaining from lung function tests needs to be reviewed. This review aims to outline the key issues and suggests newer recommendations for contraindications for performing lung function using a risk matrix, as well as offering alternative approaches to testing patients who may be at risk of complication from testing. In general, the previous recommendation of waiting for 6 weeks after surgical procedures or medical complications before performing lung function can often now be reduced to <3 weeks with modern less invasive surgical techniques.
- Lung function tests
- surgery lung physiology
- respiratory measurement
- lung physiology
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
- Lung function tests
- surgery lung physiology
- respiratory measurement
- lung physiology
As lung function testing, and particularly spirometry, becomes more widespread across primary and secondary, care there are greater numbers of practitioners and commissioners who are unaware of the potential harm and discomfort that these tests can cause to some patients. International guidelines on contraindications for lung function tests1 have been cited by many sources2 3 but their evidence base is generally from the USA and is founded only on expert opinion which is now >30 years old.4–7 Recent developments in surgical practice and technology have decreased the invasive nature of procedures, so some of the contraindications may now need modification.
This paper aims to review the evidence base for these contraindications and, where it is lacking, examine the known facts around the potential problems in order to suggest new recommendations. In the current culture of evidence-based medicine, this is a timely and worthwhile review that needs wide dissemination and discussion in order to formulate new guidelines.
Contraindications generally fall under the umbrella of risk management and clinical governance issues in most health centres. Risk management is made up of two components (1) the likelihood of the event happening and (2) the severity of the consequences for the patient if it happens. In most areas of respiratory physiology testing, the likelihood of an adverse event is very low and many often have relatively minor (non-life-threatening) consequences (eg, cataract detachment during spirometry). Even the more serious surgical complications such as rupture of an aortic aneurysm which has an absolute prevalence of only 7.1% in men and 1.6% in women8 are relatively rare, so the likelihood of these happening during spirometry is very rare. Postponed lung function testing due to current contraindications in our experience is only ∼0.3–0.5% (personal communication, ARTP website Forum 2009). A suggested table of relative risks appears in appendix 1.
Contraindications can be considered as being ‘relative’ or ‘absolute’. Most contraindications are relative and require the requesting physician/healthcare expert to judge when it is safe and appropriate to undertake the breathing test. Absolute contraindications are those that would cause trauma, injury or death to the patient if they were undertaken. Sometimes the contraindication just means that the test is unnecessary or unlikely to be of real clinical benefit to a compromised patient, and a lung function test would be better when they are remote from surgery or infection. Similarly, a dogmatic approach of refusal to test patients with any contraindication needs to be tempered.
The main principle of performing lung function tests is that the risks of the procedure will provide information that will be outweighed by the benefit the patient's assessment for operation or treatment provides. If the reverse is true and the lung function test does not entail any benefit for the level of risk sustained, then the test should not be undertaken. Close liaison between surgical staff, medical staff and healthcare scientists/technologists in lung function should eradicate most unnecessary risk to patients.
The key relative contraindications cited by the 1996 American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) documents1 are:
Haemoptysis of unknown origin (forced expiratory manoeuvre may aggravate the underlying condition);
Unstable cardiovascular status (forced expiratory manoeuvre may worsen angina or cause changes in blood pressure) or ‘recent’ myocardial infarction or pulmonary embolus;
Thoracic, abdominal or cerebral aneurysms (danger of rupture due to increased thoracic pressure);
‘Recent’ eye surgery (eg, cataract);
Presence of an acute illness or symptom that might interfere with test performance (eg, nausea, vomiting); and
Recent thoracic or abdominal surgery.
These recommendations are based on very little concrete evidence.4–7 and to date there have been no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in this area. Each of these key issues will be reviewed in this paper and, where possible, new recommendations will be suggested.
Potential harm from lung function tests
The most likely harm from lung function testing originates probably from four key factors:
Maximal pressures generated in the thorax and their impact on abdominal and thoracic organs/tissues.
Large swings in blood pressure causing stresses on tissues in the body (head, limbs, etc.).
Expansion of the chest wall and lungs.
Active communicable diseases (tuberculosis (TB), hepatitis B, HIV, etc.).
It is worth noting that postoperative physiotherapy including encouraging deep breathing, coughing and incentive spirometry after thoracic surgery is actually thought to be beneficial in terms of reversing atelectasis, thus reducing the risk of pneumonia.8 9 Similarly in cardiothoracic surgery the emphasis is now shifting towards earlier mobilisation of the patient postoperatively in order to re-establish normal respiration rather than a policy of avoiding activity.9 10
Many contraindications have a higher risk, with the more volitional tests involving forced manoeuvres such as spirometry, maximum mouth pressures and possibly full exercise tests. However, considerable information can be gained from less forced tests such as oscillometry, relaxed vital capacity, static lung volume assessment, gas transfer and some of the field tests (incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT), 6 minute walking distance (6 MWD)) and of course blood gas analysis and oximetry. Use of lower risk/less strenuous tests should always be considered by the referring physician/surgeon or the staff running lung function services.
Tissue healing time
It is well documented that the healing process requires platelets and macrophages that are essential to wound healing. Platelets participate in the initiation of the healing process by releasing local growth factors that stimulate connective tissue repair and macrophage activity. After the first 24 h, the macrophages produce the growth factors needed to continue the healing process. The three steps of healing: (1) inflammation/reactive, (2) proliferation/reparative and (3) remodelling/maturational are all orchestrated by circulating and local factors that drive the wound healing.11–13
General healing times are reported in many textbooks and practice guidelines, but these can only be a guide since there is understandably a large variation depending upon individual circumstances. Table 1 shows some typical values from occupational health organisations as a guide to healing time. At least 5% of patients undergoing a surgical procedure develop a surgical site infection. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellennce (NICE) has published general recommendations on surgical site infection and healing (http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG74NICEGuideline.pdf).
‘Healing time’ is a general term and may refer to functional healing rather than tissue repair, and does not of course mean that patients could not perform lung function tests before this time. The time taken before maximal manouevres would cause damage to the surgical area (eg, rupture stitches, etc.) or pain to the patient needs to be considered. Also, there are a number of risk factors which prolong healing, including smoking, diabetes, age, poor nutritional status and general health.11–13
Surgical procedures that could be affected by lung function testing include the following categories:
Generally, the more muscular damage involved in abdominal surgery, the longer the time for healing is required.
Laparotomy for abdominal surgery is increasingly being reduced by using laparoscopy involving ‘keyhole’ techniques. A recent Cochrane review14 has shown that people who have keyhole procedures can return to their normal daily activities on average 3–4 days earlier than those who have open surgery. One study on gastric bypass surgery comparing laparoscopic with conventional surgery15 has shown that lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)) falls to 40% of the preoperative value on the first postoperative day, 50% by day 3 and 80% by day 7. By day 7 there was no difference in lung function after either surgical technique. This suggests that meaningful spirometry can be performed if required within 1 week of abdominal surgery by either technique.
The general consensus for the healing of an uncomplicated caesarean section is ∼6–8 weeks. There is little evidence base for this except expert opinion.
One of the potential risks from spirometry after eye surgery is the increase in intraocular pressure (IOP) producing damage to the wound site in the eye or damage to optic nerves or blood vessels. However, the size of this risk needs to be evaluated.
There is a logical relationship between increasing blood pressure in the jugular vein and increased intracranial pressure, and an increase in the episcleral venous pressure, to an elevation of IOP.16 17 However, the association between arterial blood pressure and IOP is not entirely clear. While a number of studies have found a higher risk for glaucoma in people with high blood pressure, a study in 200218 suggested that people with blood pressure that is low relative to their IOP may be at higher risk for glaucoma. The same study found no higher risk for glaucoma in people with hypertension, and, in fact, high blood pressure was associated with a lower risk.
The normal circadian range for IOP is between 13 and 16 mm Hg, with the higher pressure occurring in the afternoon in both health and disease19 Postoperatively (eg, phacoemulsification, cataract, laser surgery) the IOP typically increases on average by 8 mm Hg at 2 h and is then only 5 mm Hg above baseline at 24 h postoperation.19–26
IOP changes between recumbent and sitting positions by about only 2–4 mm Hg.27 In a study of IOP changes during weightlifting20 with and without breath-holding, IOP increased by 4 and 2 mm Hg, respectively. This suggests that the manoeuvres for spirometry (similar to weightlifting with breath-hold) develop pressure changes that are far lower than the pressure for which IOP-lowering drugs are used postsurgery in patients with glaucoma (ie, >35 mm Hg). Ironically, during strenuous exercise testing the IOP actually falls by ∼8 mm Hg in healthy subjects, which is attributed to osmotic changes taking place.
It is generally considered that it is the peaks in IOP that can cause damage postoperatively and that with modern laser techniques healing is complete after a few days, with a safety margin of a week before generating straining pressures being prudent.28
Cataract surgery can cause glaucoma so it is very important to minimise any activity that increases internal eye pressure.29 Postoperative cataract patients are recommended to (1) minimise vigorous exercise, (2) put on shoes while sitting and without lifting up the feet, (3) kneel instead of bending over to pick something up and (4) avoid lifting. Pressure during spirometry is less than maximum expiratory pressures (eg, 70–200 cm H2O) but a cough can induce 400 cm H2O which implies that the IOP changes in spirometry are probably not harmful.
The complication rate for cataract surgery is low (1–3%), and it is considered that many IOP spikes are probably more associated with routine physical stresses (eg, lifting, straining, rubbing the eyes, etc.).30 The role of coughing and sneezing has been studied, including the ‘photic’ sneeze (exposure to bright light initiating sneezing) being induced by anaesthesia used for eye surgery, and the risks of postoperative damage.21 22
Typically laser surgery patients leave the surgical site within an hour of surgery, and vision usually remains blurred for a 2–6 week period. For most patients, tissue healing is complete in 50–60 h,31 with most of the tissue repair occurring in the first 24 h.32 Laser surgery complication rates are ∼3% less than conventional (mechanical microkeratome) surgery. The recovery time may also be slightly faster with laser surgery.
There are published recommendations for waiting time before commercial diving after eye surgery33 (table 2) for a variety of eye operations. It is likely that the pressures from positive (during descent) and negative (on ascent) ‘squeezes’ of the eye during diving are in excess of the stresses of lung function testing (eg, spirometry, mouth pressures, etc.) and perhaps these should be considered as reasonable evidence for waiting before performing lung function tests.
Evidence of perioperative complications
Uncomplicated healing of muscle and tendon to allow normal postoperative function takes ∼3 weeks in animals13 and 4–6 weeks in humans.11–13 In a European study34 of thoracic surgery the overall mortality was 3.8% for a variety of procedures (pneumonectomy, lobectomy, etc.).9 34 Most deaths were respiratory (47.3%), which emphasises the need to assess lung function preoperatively. There is little evidence that lung function testing was to blame for any of these deaths.
Sternal wound complications
The mechanism by which maximal lung function testing manoeuvres could affect thoracic surgery patients postoperatively centres around sternal wound complications. These fall into three categories: (1) deep subcutaneous infection, (2) sternal infection and (3) mediastinal infection with sternal dehiscence.
Mediastinitis can contribute to the development of life-threatening illnesses, such as systemic sepsis, respiratory insufficiency and renal failure. Mediastinitis may result in sternal instability and dehiscence,35 36 and is usually evident from 6 days to 3 weeks following surgery. Patients at risk for mediastinitis and dehiscence include: those older than 65 years, those with diabetes, older women (osteoporosis), obese patients, those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and those subjected to prolonged postoperative ventilation.37
Sternal wound complications occur in significant numbers of patients. Upwards of 2.3% of patients may suffer these complications, with an associated mortality rate of 13–52%.34 35 38 The mortality after initial discharge and up to the first postoperative year is nearly as high as the in-hospital mortality.38
Aggressive coughing and deep breathing manoeuvres, which frequently initiate coughing, are important for purging the lungs of fluid and inflating the lungs to prevent atelectasis after thoracic surgery. These manoeuvres are initiated in the hospital and are a mandatory part of postdischarge respiratory treatment.39–41 The percussive expansion associated with coughing puts extreme stress on the sternal wound. Ambulating, getting into and out of bed or chairs, bowel movements and other normal activities also place strain on the sternotomy site. While patients experience this stress on their sternal wound as pain and the feeling that they are ‘coming apart’, the clinical result may in fact be grave: dehiscence and mediastinal infection. Sternal stability is crucial in preventing these severe sternal wound complications. The techniques used by patients to cough post-thoracotomy (bending forward, holding the wound, etc.) may be used if a breathing test is required in the immediate postoperative period.
There is evidence that partial upper sternotomy improves pulmonary function and reduces pain in comparison with standard full sternotomy.42
There is increasing use of starting physiotherapy as soon as possible after thoracic surgery, with growing evidence of clinical benefit.10 43–47 This not only reduces the recovery time but appears to cause little harm to the recovering patient. Extrapolating from this suggests that performing of forced manoeuvres with care is possible probably within weeks of thoracic surgery.
There are a number of studies that have performed spirometry to monitor recovery in a variety of thoracic surgery procedures and they show that measurements are possible at 2, 8 and 24 h post-thoracotomy.48 There were no reports of complications. Other studies have performed spirometry postoperatively at 1 day49 or at 2, 3 and 4 days50 51 without reported complications.
Another study of two different local anaesthetic regimes for thoracotomy pain relief performed pulmonary function tests on 68 patients who underwent a standard posterolateral thoracotomy. Pulmonary function was measured using bedside spirometry at 24, 32 and 72 h and showed in the postoperative period a mean improvement of 30% for FEV1, 24% for forced vital capacity (FVC) and 19% for peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) compared with placebo. There was no significant difference between pain scores, opiate requirement or pulmonary function between two different anaesthetics. Together these studies suggest that spirometry performed postoperatively after thoracotomy is both tolerated and possible in patients. However, what is unclear is whether the results are limited by the physiology or the pain. Tests in this period should rarely be required.52
Ear operations and infections
In patients with a middle ear infection there is a risk that the forced manoeuvres (spirometry or maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)/maximal inspiratory pressure (MEP)) could cause the ear drum to rupture. At the very least the patient could experience excessive pain, but this is likely to be self-limiting as they refuse to do further testing. If testing is not urgent, then postponing spirometry until the infection has subsided may be beneficial.
There are no clear published guidelines on lung function after brain surgery. Most texts refer to 3–6 weeks postoperative uncomplicated recovery depending on the degree of surgery. It is likely that forced manoeuvres should be avoided in the first few weeks, but more gentle tests could be performed in the immediate postoperative period. Preoperative assessments for brain tumour surgery may detect underlying lung disease and help anticipate postsurgical complications.
Normal pregnancy is a physiological state and not a medical condition, so lung function should not present any special problems to pregnant women requiring lung function tests. A lax cervix leading to third trimester abortion is treated with a Shirodka suture where ‘bearing down’ may not a good idea in these patients. There are a variety of studies of lung function in human pregnancy, including spirometry,53 lung volumes,53 54 airway resistance,55 maximum mouth pressures,56 gas transfer54 57–59 or maximum oxygen uptake60 during swimming and cycling in the third trimester. Most find normal values and report no complications in women.
However, the complications of pregnancy such as pre-eclampsia, risk of early delivery and respiratory disease all present risks to both the mother and fetus/baby and need consideration. Pregnant women with respiratory complications such as cystic fibrosis,61 asthma,62 63 COPD64 and other common lung disease can require full lung function tests. The problem is not in the difficulty or risks of performing the tests but usually in interpreting and reporting the results against normal (non-pregnant) reference ranges.
The levels of carbon monoxide (CO) in a non-smoking female who is not pregnant will be minimal, despite the endogenous carboxyhaemoglobin (COHb) levels estimated to be ∼0.1–1.0%. If this is translated into exhaled CO, then this is ∼6–8 ppm. If a subject lives in a town and is exposed to vehicle fumes, this will raise the COHb to ∼1.5–2.0% or ∼10 ppm.65 A value of 10 ppm is the normal upper limit set to differentiate smokers from non-smokers—although some workers use values as low as 6 ppm. Smokers with expired CO values of 11–21 ppm are defined as mild smokers, whereas those with expired CO values of <21 ppm are defined as heavy smokers.66 The mean calculated increase in COHb per gas transfer test is only 0.65±0.1%67 and is similar whether the subject performs 4–6 tests. This presents very little significant risk to the mother or unborn child/fetus.
In asthma patients with airway inflammation, values of 10–11 ppm have been found as exhaled CO. Domestic gas cookers are believed to produce levels many times higher than this.
If a subject performing a gas transfer test inhales two attempts at 0.30% CO and breath-holds for 10 s it does increase COHb but to such a small extent that corrections for back pressure are not necessary. Extrapolating these data to human pregnancy would suggest that the rise in COHb would be no greater than for someone exposed to normal environmental air pollution and actually well within the normal range of exhaled CO. Since the half-life of COHb is ∼4 h, there is an infinitesimally small increase in risk to the patient and to the developing fetus/baby. This increase would be less than what a pregnant woman would be exposed to under normal daily conditions, assuming she was a non-smoker. If she had moderately well controlled asthma but with some airway inflammation, then the background COHb would actually swamp any increase in COHb due to inhaling CO during the test.
The risks to the developing baby from carbon monoxide in the CO transfer tests is insignificant compared with the risks from exposure to cigarette smoking during pregnancy.
Traditionally postpartum bed rest was the standard practice on maternity wards, but more recently this has been questioned and many postpartum activity restrictions are regarded as being needlessly restrictive.68 Therefore, it appears there is little reason to exclude women who urgently need lung function tests in the postpartum period.
Pre-eclampsia by its definition can produce extremely high blood pressure values which on exposure to forced exertions (eg, spirometry) could lead to cranial blood vessel rupture or neurophysiological sequelae, and should be avoided where possible. However, for the requirements of the anaesthetist with a patient with pre-eclampsia who has lung disease undergoing emergency surgery a relaxed vital capacity manouvre would at least produce a minimal vital capacity. Usually the risk to mother and baby is so high that emergency surgery (if required) would go ahead anyway.
For clinical purposes, massive pulmonary embolus (PE) is defined as pulmonary embolism with either haemodynamic collapse or an occlusion of the pulmonary artery that exceeds 50% of its cross-sectional area. The overall mortality rate associated with massive PE remains at ∼30%.69
Risk of death is reduced from 30% to 1–2% if patients are on anticoagulant treatment after PE.69 Therefore, lung function tests should only be performed if required while the patient is on anticoagulant treatment.
Lung function tests can be performed in the presence of a pleural effusion and are often used in diagnosis of the problem with the symptoms of pleuritic pain and dyspnoea. After the effusion has been drained it is possible to perform lung function tests, although this may be limited by pain. One published report described spirometry within 24 h of draining a pleural effusion.70 As always the balance between discomfort and meaningful clinical results needs to be considered.
Primary spontaneous pneumothorax rarely happens during strenuous exercise.71 Once sealed, the rate of re-absorption of air in the pleural space is 1.24% of the volume of the pneumothorax in each 24 h72 so recovery can take 16 days for a 20% pneumothorax. The main risk of pneumothorax is discomfort and pain rather than death. Most patients could therefore safely undertake lung function testing 2 weeks after treatment.
Unexplained haemoptysis is a concern because the exertion of the test may cause further bleeding and run the risk of further morbidity by aspiration into the non-bleeding lobe or lung. Haemoptysis is a serious symptom which could indicate the presence of thoracic vascular injury, arteriovenous malformation, leaking thoracic aneurysm, etc.73 It is also worth considering that performing a gas transfer test will produce an erroneous overestimation if there is fresh occult blood in the airway, so it either may not be helpful to perform the test anyway or else it could help in the diagnosis (eg, Goodpasture's syndrome).
Cardiac and cardiovascular disorders
The repair of aneurysms has evolved enormously, with internal ‘stenting’ under radiographic image control replacing surgical intervention. Exercise ECG was undertaken postoperatively on patients at the Mayo clinic who had ascending aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and they had no problems (ie, rupturing) in 1000 cases.74
A large (>6 cm) or bulging aneurysm would cause concern of a rupture when performing lung function tests, but for standard AAAs it is probably safe. If the AAA has grown quickly then it would be recommended to discuss such cases with a vascular surgeon before proceeding with spirometry. The dilemma is often that the patient will need preoperative spirometry for the surgeons to predict their outcome after surgery. More data need to be collected on what actually happens and how many lung function tests are performed safely with AAAs >6 cm.
Myocardial infarction (MI)
One week after an MI most patients are deemed to be stable. However, the definition of ‘stable’ is not clear. Recent American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) recommendations3 suggest waiting for 1 month post-MI before undertaking lung function tests, but there is no evidence base for this.
Exercise testing 1 week after MI appears to be safe. The incidence of fatal cardiac events, including fatal MI and cardiac rupture, is 0.03%, for non-fatal MI and successfully resuscitated cardiac arrest it is 0.09%, and for complex arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia, it is 1.4%. Symptom-limited protocols have an event rate that is 1.9 times that of submaximal tests, although the overall fatal event rate is quite low.75–77 The majority of the safety data are based on exercise testing performed >7 days after MI. The number of patients reported at 4–7 days was more limited, and typically time was reported as a mean value or a range so that it is impossible to determine how many patients were studied at 4 days.
The safety data on exercise testing post-MI show that most patients are stable after 7 days so it is reasonable to perform lung function tests safely after this time.
The time needed following vascular surgery (especially lower limb) before full respiratory exercise tests are performed is typically 4–6 weeks (T Fail and G Hamilton personal communication 2010).
Uncontrolled high blood pressure can cause damage to blood vessels (aneurysm, atherosclerosis), the heart (angina, failure, enlarged heart, etc.) and the brain (transient ischaemic attack, stroke, seizures and encephalopathy).
Given the evidence on treating acute hypertension and the risks of stroke it may be logical to apply the recommendation that mean arterial pressure is maintained at <130 mm Hg during the first 6–12 h from the start of antihypertensive treatment in order to keep an intracerebral haemorrhage from enlarging.78 Antihypertensive treatment should be used which should control blood pressure towards normal values (mean arterial pressure is maintained at <130 mm Hg) before forced manoeuvres (eg, mouth pressures or spirometry) are attempted. However, patients on new hypertensive drugs may have dizzy spells or syncope from the forced manoeuvres of spirometry. Where suspicion of severe hypertension is high, blood pressure should be measured prior to testing. More evidence is needed to support these recommendations.
Apart from any physical incapability (eg, ability to hold mouthpiece, facial palsy, etc.) brought on by acute stroke, once the patient is stabilised on anticoagulation and/or antihypertensive medication there is little reason why lung function tests cannot be performed. Many patients with COPD have stroke as a co-morbidity and often spirometry may be performed to optimise COPD interventions poststroke. Patients with a facial palsy may require assistance to get a good seal with the spirometer, but there is no published evidence of risks from lung function testing in this patient group poststroke.
Unstable angina is recognised as a serious contraindication for lung function testing.2 3 However, physical activity bringing on angina as a presymptom of acute MI is a poor prognostic indicator.79 The need for spirometry preoperatively in a patient with chronic stable angina (eg, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or aortic valve replacement) is a common demand in lung function departments. The use of sublingual GTN (glyceryl trinitrate) prior to testing is often sufficient to avoid symptoms and enable useful lung function tests to be performed.
Apart from extreme exercise, there is little risk from performing lung function tests in patients with an arrhythmia. Patient anxiety and discomfort may affect the results and limit performance, but there are no published guidelines against performing exertional manoeuvres.
Generally a few weeks is usually enough for the pacemaker site wound to heal, and there have been no published precautions in this area.
Contraindications for lung function tests in relation to infections can fall into several categories:
Harm to the patient from performing the test.
Pain or discomfort for the patients (eg, vomiting, diarrhoea, cold sores, common cold).
Harm to staff or other patients (contagious disease, infections).
Redundant results because of submaximal effort from patients that are feeling unwell.
The results do not contribute to the clinical plan.
The main infectious diseases that would present a risk of cross-infection in the lung function department or other lung function testing facility include TB and hepatitis B.
General infection control procedures should be adopted in accordance with international guidelines to stop the spread of nosocomial infections (eg, influenza, pneumonia, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridium difficile). These have been covered elsewhere in a review of best practice.80
Contraindications in specific tests in respiratory physiological measurement
There are several relative contraindications for specific tests carried out by practitioners of lung function. The key tests covered are described.
Contraindications for arterial blood gas sampling
Factors significantly increasing the risk of arterial puncture include the existence of aortic valvular incompetence in the patient, systemic anticoagulation at the time of the arterial puncture and the presence of arteriosclerosis or hypertension in the patient.81
Contraindications for lung volume estimation
With respect to whole-body plethysmography, relative contraindications include factors such as claustrophobia, upper body paralysis, obtrusive body casts, intravenous pumps or other conditions that immobilise or prevent the patient from fitting into or gaining access to the ‘body box’. In addition, the procedure may necessitate stopping intravenous treatment or supplemental oxygen. There are similar risks with other lung volume estimations (gas dilution/nitrogen washout) during the maximum inspiration to total lung capacity or expiration to residual volume manoeuvres. There is a theoretical risk of exposure to high oxygen levels during nitrogen washout test in patients who have CO2 retention—but the short duration of the measurement will render this harmless.
Contraindications for bronchodilator testing
Tachydysrhythmias (can be provoked by β2-agonists);
Decreased glucose tolerance;
Unstable diabetes mellitus; and
Concomitant use of cardiac glycosides.
However, the risk of a single administration, for diagnostic purposes, is minimal.
Apart from ‘hypersensitivity’ to atropine-like substances, anticholinergics administered by inhalation have few known contraindications.
Contraindications for other lung function-related services
Since the original AARC contraindications were published, many lung function departments and units offer physiological measurements services not originally considered for having contraindications. These include:
Sleep studies, including overnight oximetry;
Continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) adaptation;
Bronchial challenge testing;
Blood gas measurements;
Bronchodilator response (ultrasonic nebuliser-induced bronchospasm); and
Contraindications for these procedures are summarised here. Again, many of the recommendations are based on expert opinion.
Sleep studies, including overnight oximetry
Patients who could be at risk from strangulation from wires and leads used in monitoring devices need a risk assessment to be performed. Children are at particular risk. Somnambulists could pull equipment on top of themselves, although the more recent use of ‘Holter’ type measuring devices decreases this risk.
Relative contraindications should be applied to patients with known anaphylactic responses, persistent severe or unstable asthma, pregnancy and those with a known severe initial allergic reaction. Systemic collapse and fatalities have been reported, and these are more common in infants and in patients where the reaction was systemic (food allergy, latex, insect stings).
Ensure no antihistamines, tricyclic antidepressants, some antinauseants and topical (not oral) steroids are used because they can alter the results of the test. β-Blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be used with caution. Guidelines for skin prick testing are available.84
Home CPAP and NIV issues
CPAP should be avoided in patients with middle ear infections or severe sinusitis. Other complications can include sores over the bridge of the nose, dryness of the nose and leaks from the edges of the mask causing dry eyes. However, having no leak suggests that the mask may be too tight, leading to the development of facial sores. Any patient with a pneumothorax should be referred for specialist ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU)/high dependency unit (HDU) setting.
Extreme caution should be taken with patients who have ‘brittle asthma’ or who have shown strong anaphylactic response in the past. Nebulised bronchodliators should be immediately available, together with an emergency resuscitation trolley. Guidelines have been published85 which show the absolute and relative contraindications:
Severe acute airflow limitation: FEV1 <50% of predicted.
Heart attack or stroke in last 3 months.
Uncontrolled hypertension: systolic blood pressure >200 mm Hg or diastolic pressure >120 mmHg.
Known history of aortic aneurysm.
Moderate airflow limitation: FEV1 <60% of predicted or <1.5 litres.
Inability to perform spirometry of acceptable quality.
Current use of cholinesterase inhibitor medication (for myasthenia gravis).
Occasionally, it is not possible to perform valid lung function tests on patients who have contraindications or are confused/very unwell. Well trained staff will either postpone the test or comment on the limitations. The results may be uninterpretable. Three large lung function centres in the UK report a 0.3–0.5% cancellation rate due to contraindications per year.
Blood gas measurements
Patients with clotting problems (heparin, thrombocytopenia with a platelet count of <100×109/l or patients on anticoagulants) should not have arterial stabs but should be offered an ear lobe capillary blood gas measurement. Patients with haemophilia or a platelet count of >100×109/l are generally at low risk from an arterial stab, but those with a count of 50–100×109/l are at increased risk of bleeding. In hypoxaemic patients capillary blood gases correctly performed are just as reliable as arterial stabs.81 86–89
Oxygen assessments have the risks from carbon dioxide retention leading to narcosis, plus the risk of arterial gas measurements indicated above. Assessing patients according to evaluated criteria should include screening with oximetry before a blood gas measurement is made.
Lung compliance measurement
The safety of pressure–volume curves has been evaluated and shown to be acceptable in most patients in a critical care setting. In acutely ill patients they can lead to hypoxaemia and haemodynamic changes which require close monitoring.90
Lung function testing on children will present similar contraindications to testing adults, but in general more care needs to be taken in terms of observation and monitoring during testing. It is recommended that a pulse oximeter is used when testing in infants.91 The added complications of sedation in infants have also been covered elsewhere, but such studies are usually limited to highly specialised centres with trained and experienced personnel.91
Clearly from this review, it is apparent that the evidence base is lacking in many areas as regards contraindications for lung function testing. It would be prudent if over the course of the next few years departments and practitioners considered either prospective or retrospective investigations or audit into the following areas of uncertainty.
Review or audit of patients undergoing preoperative lung function assessments and how many of them have complications either during or just after testing should be carried out in the following groups of patients:
Other useful areas of research would include
Changes in intraocular pressure during spirometry
Changes in blood pressure during spirometry
Reviews of complications after surgical procedures where lung function testing is performed in the perioperative period
Review of lung function testing-related complications with keyhole surgery
Review of lung function testing during pregnancy.
There are some limited or absolute contraindications for performing lung function tests (unstable cardiovascular conditions, etc.) but most are relative contraindications. These have been summarised in table 3 and appendix 2.
The risks of any test must be outweighed by the benefit gained.
While modern surgical techniques have decreased the amount of tissue intervention and reduced healing times, there is still a case for allowing large muscle masses to heal for 4–6 weeks before testing of lung function is resumed. The risks to eye surgery and patients receiving less invasive surgery is much less, and healing times suggest that waiting for 2–3 weeks may be sufficient.
There needs to be more research and audit to investigate whether lung function tests do actually present any risks and also what evidence there is for a minimum time before tests are measured postsurgery or cardiovascular event.
I am grateful to a number of colleagues who have provided expert advice and opinion on various areas. These include Drs Mick Davies and Sara Thorne, Consultant Cardiological Physicians, UHB, Dr Rosalind Harrison, Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon, Burton on Trent, Dr Martin Miller, Consultant Respiratory Physician University Hospital Birmingham, Dr Dan Veale, University Hospital, Grenoble, France. I am also grateful to colleagues who have provided information on the ARTP Forum, but especially Dr Adrian Kendrick, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Mr Trefor Watts, Walsall Manor Hospital and Mr Derek Cramer Royal Brompton Hospital.
Appendix 1: Guide to risks from performing lung function tests
|Contraindication||Complication||Likelihood (A)||Consequence (B)||Risk (A×B)|
|MI (recent)||Further MI||5||5||25|
|Ascending aortic aneurysm (>6 cm)||Death||4||5||20|
|Ascending aortic aneurysm (>6 cm)||MI||4||4||16|
|Thoracic surgery||Further surgery||3||4||12|
|Ascending aortic aneurysm (<6 cm)||Death||2||5||10|
|Ascending aortic aneurysm (<6 cm)||MI||2||4||8|
|Eye surgery (<1 week)||Undo surgery||2||3||6|
|Eye surgery (<1 week)||Undo surgery||2||3||6|
|MI (>1 week)||Death||1||5||5|
|Eye surgery (<4 week)||Undo surgery||1||3||3|
|Eye surgery (<4 week)||Pain||1||2||2|
|MI (>1 week)||Pain||1||2||2|
Risk: 1–4, low; 5–9, moderate; 10–19, high; 20–25, very high.
Likelihood: 1, <1%; 2, 2–10%; 3, 11–20%; 4, 21–50%; 5, >50%.
Consequence: 1, discomfort; 2, pain; 3, syncope/bleeding; 4, tissue damage, minor surgery; 5, emergency care, major surgery, death.
MI, myocardial infarction; PE, pulmonary embolus.
Appendix 2: Summary of wait time before lung function testing
|Contraindication*||Severity||RR||Routine wait weeks|
|MI (recent)||Further MI||25||1|
|Ascending aortic aneurysm (>6 cm)||Death||20||1|
|Ascending aortic aneurysm (>6 cm)||MI||16||1|
|Thoracic surgery||Further surgery||12||4|
|Ascending aortic aneurysm (<6 cm)||Death||10||1|
|Ascending aortic aneurysm (<6 cm)||MI||8||1|
|Eye surgery (<1 week)||Undo surgery||6||1|
|Eye surgery (>1 week)||Undo surgery||6||1|
|MI (>1 week)||Death||5||0|
|Eye surgery (<4 week)||Undo surgery||3||1|
|Eye surgery (>4 week)||Undo surgery||3||1|
|MI (>1 week)||Pain||2||1|
↵* Contraindications are relative and sometimes the need to perform the test will over-ride the risks to the patient from the procedure. At these times it is important to get written instructions from a consultant physician, surgeon or anaesthetist to proceed with the tests.
MI, myocardial infarction; PE, pulmonary embolus.
Competing interests None.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.