Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Correspondence
β-agonist safety and the elephant in the room?
  1. P A Williamson1,
  2. P M Short1,
  3. L McKinlay1,
  4. C N A Palmer2,
  5. B J Lipworth1
  1. 1Asthma and Allergy Research Group, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
  2. 2Biomedical Research Centre, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Brian Lipworth, Asthma and Allergy Research Group, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK; brianlipworth{at}googlemail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We read with interest the recent paper by Weatherall et al who presented data from a meta-analysis of the relative safety of long-acting β-agonists (LABAs).1 In 2008 the FDA reported on the safety of LABAs and concluded that the nature and magnitude of risk needs to be confirmed. When adverse outcomes are reported relatively infrequently in clinical trials, it is difficult to interpret the value of such analysis and a more thorough examination of these index cases may yield …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • PostScript
    Mark Weatherall