Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Original article
Prediction of oral appliance efficiency in patients with apnoea using phrenic nerve stimulation while awake
  1. Valérie Bosshard1,2,
  2. Jean-François Masse1,
  3. Frédéric Sériès1
  1. 1Centre de recherche de l'Hôpital Laval, Institut Universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Québec, Canada
  2. 2Service de pneumologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Suisse
  1. Correspondence to Dr Frédéric Sériès, Unité de recherche en pneumologie, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, 2725 Chemin Sainte Foy, Sainte Foy (Québec), Canada, G1V 4G5; frederic.series{at}med.ulaval.ca

Abstract

Background In patients with sleep apnoea, primary oropharyngeal collapse of the upper airway during sleep is an important predictor of treatment success with an oral appliance. Phrenic nerve stimulation is able to induce upper airway obstruction and was therefore used to mimic the target for an efficient treatment with an oral appliance.

Objective To test if the site(s) of upper airway collapse identified by means of bilateral anterior magnetic stimulation during wakefulness could predict the efficacy of treatment with an oral appliance in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea.

Methods The site(s) of upper airway collapse while awake were identified by examining the flow–pressure relationship of flow-limited twitches when measuring velopharyngeal and oropharyngeal pressure. Once the mandibular advancement titration had been completed, the efficacy of mandibular advancement was documented during an in-lab sleep study.

Results 33 patients (24 men and 9 women, apnoea–hypopnoea index (AHI) 32.5±17.1/h) participated in the study. Flow limitation was obtained in 29, but 3 of these had no follow-up sleep study with the device. Subjects with oropharyngeal and velopharyngeal collapse did not differ in the phenotypic characteristics associated with a positive response to an oral appliance (gender, apnoea severity, body mass index or positional dependency of breathing disturbances). Complete or partial success was seen in 14/17 subjects with twitch-induced oropharyngeal collapse and in 4/12 patients with velopharyngeal closure. Treatment response was significantly different in subjects with twitch-induced oropharyngeal and velopharyngeal collapse (OR 9.5, 95% CI 1.6 to 52.7).

Conclusions Identifying the site of upper airway collapse by using bilateral anterior magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve during wakefulness can predict treatment success with an oral appliance in patients with sleep apnoea.

  • Upper airway
  • oropharynx
  • closing pressure
  • magnetic stimulation
  • sleep apnoea

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Funding Chaire de Pneumologie JD Bégin de l'Université Laval.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Comité d'Éthique, Institut de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québnec.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.