Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Authors' response
  1. John C Moore-Gillon1,
  2. Peter D O Davies2,
  3. L Peter Ormerod3
  1. 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, St Bartholomew's and Royal London Hospitals, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool, UK
  3. 3Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Blackburn Hospital, Lancashire, UK
  1. Correspondence to John C Moore-Gillon, Barts and the London NHS Trust, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK; john.mooregillon{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

We welcome the correspondence1 2 relating to our recent editorial3 and thank the authors for their interest.

Mr Thomas from the Royal Bournemouth Hospital presents two interesting local audits. The first highlights the possibility of wasted resources in screening individuals identified by the Port Health Control Unit as having an abnormal chest x-ray. The second demonstrates the potential shortcoming in the NICE guidelines, which can lead to an underidentification of latent tuberculosis (TB) infection. We share Mr Thomas's concerns, particularly on this latter point.

Dr Pareek and colleagues from Imperial College and the Health Protection Agency show that the NICE guidance is often not followed and that it is TB services which serve the areas with the highest TB burden which appear least likely to undertake screening for latent TB infection. This latter finding is, we would argue, unsurprising when resources are as scarce as they are in TB services. Those in high burden areas will be concentrating on ‘fire fighting’—treating those cases of actual disease which actually do arise, with little or no time left for detecting latent infection and preventing the emergence of new active cases. This is likely to be a funding issue. Even in 2001, only one in six of high TB burden districts met minimum staffing recommendations.4 Despite the DH funding template produced in 2007, this is widely ignored by primary care trusts as ‘not applying to them’, continuing the under-resourcing of TB services in many high (and some low) burden districts.

These authors also highlight the deviation from the NICE guidance in the latent TB infection screening methods employed, and we agree that there is a need for effective national coordination. They agree with our arguments regarding the need to change policy and we too feel that there is a need for an expanded evidence base to determine the most effective structure for the future. We also agree on the need for health economic analysis in these cost-constrained times. We understand that this will be provided in the updated economic appraisal of this area, which should be part of the revised NICE TB guidelines in January 2011, and believe it will be fully supportive of our case.



  • Linked articles 152868, 152280.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles