Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Editors' response
  1. Andrew Bush1,
  2. Ian Pavord2
  1. 1Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK
  2. 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Thoracic Surgery and Allergy, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Road, Leicester, LE3 9QP, UK
  1. Correspondence to Andrew Bush, Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College and Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK; A.Bush{at}rbht.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

The review article by Chapman et al1 has provoked a vigorous correspondence,2–5 amongst other things calling on Thorax to ‘respond appropriately’ and even withdraw the manuscript. We inherited the manuscript from our predecessors and played no part in its commissioning or review. However, we are quite clear that the appropriate response is not to withdraw the manuscript, but …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Linked articles 149773, 150219, 151167, 149633.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles