Article Text


Respiratory physiology: old and new concepts
P132 Carbon dioxide sensitivity in patients with hyperventilation syndrome
  1. K A Bazin1,
  2. S Moosavi2,
  3. K Murphy1,
  4. A Perkins2,
  5. M Hickson1,
  6. L S Howard1
  1. 1Imperial College Healthcare NHS trust, London, UK
  2. 2Imperial College London, London, UK


Background Many body systems may be affected by chronic hyperventilation and symptoms may be wide-ranging. There is no obvious cause, no gold standard test and not all patients with Hyperventilation Syndrome (HVS) demonstrate characteristic low resting PaCO2. No previous studies were found that reported the breath-hold time of HVS subjects at functional residual capacity, subjects' end-tidal carbon dioxideat the breakpoint of breath-hold, the subjective experience of breath-hold or the effect of carbon dioxide inhalation on the perception of breathing discomfort in HVS subjects.

Methods Five HVS patients, diagnosed by a respiratory physician, with no organic cause for breathlessness and referred for physiotherapy assessment (females, aged 21–70) and five healthy controls (females, aged 21–28) were studied. Breath-hold tests at total lung capacity (TLC) and functional residual capacity (FRC). Incremental inhalation of CO2 was performed, whilst breathing frequency and volume was unconstrained (‘free’) and when ‘fixed’ by a breathing circuit and metronome. Components of minute ventilation were recorded via inductive plethysmography, in addition to end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2). A 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to obtain a measure of breathing discomfort during breath-hold tests and CO2 inhalation. The breathlessness experience associated with each CO2 inhalation was assessed with the previously-published D-12 questionnaire.

Results The HVS group demonstrated a lower breath-hold time at TLC (32 vs 68 s, p=0.03) and could not hold their breath at FRC compared with controls. During the incremental CO2 inhalation tests there was a borderline significant increase in PETCO2 at the limit of tolerance in the HVS group during free breathing (1.5 kPa, p=0.07), but not fixed (2 kPa, p=0.1). Controls described feelings of air hunger following both inhalation tests: HVS patients tended to rate higher on work and effort descriptors.

Conclusions These data suggest that patients with HVS may be more sensitive to changes in CO2 than controls. Breath-hold time at TLC and FRC may also be useful identifying patients with HVS and monitoring response to physiotherapeutic intervention. Breakpoint PETCO2 during incremental CO2 inhalation requires further validation in larger cohorts.

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.