Article Text

PDF

Lung cancer screening and smoking abstinence: 2 year follow-up data from the Dutch–Belgian randomised controlled lung cancer screening trial
  1. Carlijn Michelle van der Aalst1,2,
  2. Karien Anna Margaretha van den Bergh1,
  3. Marc Christiaan Willemsen3,
  4. Henricus Johannes de Koning1,
  5. Robertus Johannes van Klaveren2
  1. 1Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  2. 2Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  3. 3STIVORO—Dutch Expertise Centre on Tobacco Control, The Hague, The Netherlands
  1. Correspondence to C M van der Aalst, Department of Public Health/Pulmonology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; c.vanderaalst{at}erasmusmc.nl

Abstract

Background Lung cancer screening may provide a new opportunity for attempts to quit among smokers or might delay smoking cessation, but studies to date failed to provide evidence for this. This study investigated the effect of lung cancer screening on smoking abstinence in male smokers participating in the Dutch–Belgian randomised controlled lung cancer screening trial (NELSON trial).

Methods In the NELSON trial, 50- to 75-year-old participants at high risk for developing lung cancer were randomised to either lung cancer screening or no screening. Smoking behaviour was evaluated in two random samples of male smokers in the screen (n=641) and control arm (n=643) before (T0) and 2 years after randomisation (T1). In addition, the data were also analysed by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, as recommended in smoking cessation intervention trials, although non-response in screening trials can also be due to reasons other than continued smoking.

Results Almost 17% (16.6%) of the trial participants quit smoking, which is higher than the 3–7% found in the general adult population. However, screening was associated with a lower prolonged abstinence rate (14.5%) compared with no screening (19.1%) (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.92; p<0.05). No stastistically significant difference was found after performing an ITT analysis.

Conclusions This study showed that all trial participants were inclined to stop smoking more than average, which suggests that screening is a teachable moment to improve smoking behaviour. In those who underwent screening the smoking abstinence rate was significantly lower than for the control group, although the difference was modest. After ITT analysis this difference was no longer observed.

Clinical trial number ISRCTN63545820.

  • Lung cancer screening
  • prevention
  • randomised controlled trial
  • smoking cessation
  • tobacco and the lung

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • NELSON is a Dutch abbreviation for Dutch–Belgian Lung cancer Screening Trial (NEderlands–Leuvens Longkanker ScreeningsONderzoek).

  • Funding The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), the Dutch Cancer Association (KWF) and the Health Insurance Innovation Foundation (Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars), The Netherlands. The funding sources had no involvement in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Ethics approval This study was conducted with the approval of the Dutch Minister of Health after positive advice from the Dutch Health Council and by the Ethical Boards of the participating centres.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Linked Articles

  • Airwaves
    Wisia Wedzicha