Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Current strategies in pulmonary rehabilitation

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


S. J. C. Taylor, R. Sohanpal, S. A. Bremner, A. Devine, S. Eldridge, C. J. Griffiths. Barts and The London School of Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK

Introduction Trials of self-management (SM) interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have often had disappointing results. A recent Cochrane review suggested SM may reduce hospital admissions but concluded data are still insufficient to formulate recommendations.1

Objectives To conduct a pilot randomised controlled trial of a new disease-specific self-management programme for COPD.

Methods The intervention was based on the UK Expert Patients Programme (EPP) which is underpinned by the sociocognitive self-efficacy theory.2 It was distinct in three ways: (1) COPD relevant content; (2) sessions delivered by a trained lay tutor with COPD who “models” good SM; (3) involvement of a respiratory clinician (COPD patients have significant information needs). It involved seven weekly 2.5 h group sessions. Patients were recruited from primary care disease registers and randomised (2:1) to intervention or usual care. The St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), EQ-5D, exercise levels and self-efficacy (confidence) to manage COPD were collected at baseline, 2 and 6 months, as were all costs and healthcare resource use.

Results 224 (44%) patients replied to invitation letters and 116 (22%) were enrolled and randomised (78 intervention; 38 control). 46% were male, mean±SD age 69.5±9.8 years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)% predicted 54%, 78% had had unscheduled COPD care in the previous 12 months. Groups were roughly similar at baseline. 35% of intervention patients did not attend any course sessions, 40% attended 5 or more sessions. The results at 6 months suggest that the intervention may increase exercise levels by a modest amount and increase health-related quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D (no overall effect on Total SGRQ score was detected) (table 1). Economic analyses suggested that, with a willingness to pay threshold of £10 000 per quality adjusted life year gained (QALY), the intervention would have a 70% probability of being cost effective.

Abstract P51 Table 1

Outcomes at baseline and 6 months and differences between intervention and control groups at 6 months (available case analysis)

Conclusions The intervention may be unappealing or inaccessible to many patients. Despite this, the pilot study suggests the intervention may improve quality of life and is likely to meet NICE criteria for a cost-effective intervention.



1L. D. Apps, 2K. Wagg, 2L. Sewell, 2J. Williams, 1S. J. Singh, 2S. J. Singh. 1Coventry University, Coventry, UK, 2University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK

Self-management programmes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been explored with some positive results. However, the recent Cochrane Review (2007) concluded that, while there is some evidence for self-management education, further research was required to provide clear guidelines about its use. This study is a randomised controlled trial conducted in primary care to determine the effectiveness of a stand alone self-management manual for COPD (SPACE for COPD, A Self-management Programme of Activity, Coping & Education) compared with usual care.

Participants were recruited from primary care registers and randomised to usual care or self-management. The primary outcome measure was health status (Self-Reported Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ-SR)) measured at baseline and 6 weeks. Exercise performance (Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) and Endurance Shuttle Walk Test (ESWT)) was recorded as well as scores on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

To date, 36 patients have completed measures at 6 weeks, 19 from usual care (mean (SD) age 71.21 (9.17) years; forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 1.45 (0.49) l; 12 men) and 17 from self-management (mean (SD) age 65.41 (10.16) years; FEV1 1.53 (0.62) l; 8 men). Paired t tests were performed and the results are shown in table 1 for all outcome measures. There were statistically significant improvements in the self-management group for CRQ-SR domain of dyspnoea with a mean change of 0.74. There were no significant changes in the standard care group in all CRQ-SR domains of dyspnoea, fatigue, emotion and mastery. Mean changes were 0.41, 0.16, 0.23 and 0.10, respectively. Statistically significant between-group differences were found for ISWT (p<0.01), ESWT (p<0.001), CRQ emotion domain and anxiety (p<0.05). In addition, the CRQ domain of emotion attained the minimal clinically important threshold of >0.5.

Abstract P52 Table 1

Mean baseline scores and mean changes for Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Self-Reported Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire, Incremental Shuttle Walking Test (ISWT) and Endurance Shuttle Walk Test (ESWT) for usual care and self-management groups

This shows that it is feasible to deliver a self-management package in primary care as a stand alone manual, with significant improvements demonstrated in dyspnoea, exercise performance and anxiety.

View Abstract