Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Authors’ reply
  1. M Imamura,
  2. M Dohi
  1. Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  1. Dr M Dohi, Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan; mdohi-tky{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Mascitelli and colleagues propose caution in the use of statins for asthma because they might provoke the development of cancer.

At present the relationship between statins and cancer is controversial. In some clinical studies statins might have been responsible for an increased rate of breast cancer1 or prostate cancer.2 On the other hand, statins are considered as anticancer drugs.3 In a large-scale study, patients treated with statins were found to have a lower risk of cancer development.3 The relationship between Tregs and cancer is also unclear. We agree that Tregs may suppress antitumour immunity. However, deficiency of Treg function might also result in oncogenesis. Furthermore, the immunosuppressive effect of statins is not only exhibited by increasing the number and function of Tregs, although there is a reciprocal developmental pathway for Th17 and Tregs. We did not examine the effect of pravastatin on the induction of Tregs in our experimental model of allergic airway inflammation, so it is not clear whether suppression of interleukin 17 (IL17) by pravastatin results in the development of Tregs.

Taken together, although we admit that careful observation is necessary, we do not think that the treatment of asthma with statins is contraindicated because of a possible risk of cancer.

In the accompanying editorial Rubin insists that statins are not necessary for the treatment of asthma because extremely effective medications are available for asthma and the safety of statins has not been fully confirmed.4 However, there are still some patients with asthma who are resistant to current medications including systemic corticosteroids. For these patients, novel therapies are still awaited. One of the characteristic features of these patients—particularly those with more severe disease—during exacerbations and with cigarette smoking is a neutrophilic inflammation in the airway.5 It is well established that IL17 plays an important role in the recruitment of neutrophils into the lung, and treatment with pravastatin decreased IL17 production in our study.6 Statins might therefore be effective in some types of asthma with neutrophilic inflammation.

In summary, we consider that (1) to confirm the long-term safety of statins, further clinical studies with asthma or other disorders should be conducted; and (2) when the safety is definitely confirmed, statins could be a therapeutic candidate for some patients with severe steroid-resistant asthma.


View Abstract


  • Competing interests: None.