Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Letter
Thoracic ultrasound in malignant pleural effusion: a real world perspective
  1. A R L Medford1,
  2. J J Entwisle2
  1. 1
    Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  2. 2
    Department of Radiology, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr J J Entwisle, Department of Radiology, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester LE3 9QP, Leicestershire, UK; James.Entwisle{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Qureshi and colleagues achieved impressive results using thoracic ultrasound (TUS) to predict malignant pleural effusion in their recent study.1 TUS in their hands compared reasonably well with pleural CT.

However, we suggest that pleural CT still remains the gold standard and cannot be replaced by TUS except in situations where access to pleural CT is difficult. First, even in their expert hands, six out of the seven false-negative TUS examinations were resolved by pleural CT. The priority in the real …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and Peer review Not commissioned; not externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles

  • PostScript
    N R Qureshi N M Rahman F V Gleeson