Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease with a steadily increasing prevalence and mortality. However, recent epidemiological estimates differ depending on the population studied and methods used.
Aim: To investigate the prevalence, severity and burden of COPD in a primary care setting.
Methods: From 4730 patients registered in a single primary care practice, all 2250 patients aged 40 years or more were invited to participate. Participants completed a questionnaire on smoking, respiratory symptoms, education and social status. A physical examination was followed by pre- and post-bronchodilator (BD) spirometry.
Results: Of the eligible patients, 1960 (87%) participated. 92% of spirometric tests met the ATS criteria. Airflow limitation was demonstrated in 299 (15%) of the participants pre-BD and in 211 (11%) post-BD. COPD was diagnosed in 183 patients (9.3%). Of these patients, the degree of post-BD airflow limitation was mild in 30.6%, moderate in 51.4%, severe in 15.3% and very severe in 2.7%. Only 18.6% of these patients had previously been diagnosed with COPD; almost all of these had severe or very severe airflow limitation. As a result of the study, a diagnosis of asthma was made in 122 patients.
Conclusions: The prevalence and underdiagnosis of COPD in adult patients in this primary care setting made case finding worthwhile. Large numbers of newly detected patients were symptomatic and needed treatment. Limiting investigations to smokers would have reduced the number of COPD diagnoses by 26%.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disabling disease. Mortality from COPD is increasing worldwide.1 Prevalence estimates of COPD differ largely depending on the diagnostic instruments used and the population studied.2 Other major sources of difference in COPD prevalence estimates are related to different spirometric criteria for bronchial obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) fixed ratio versus lower limit of normal), type of spirometric test (pre- or post-bronchodilator (BD)) and a cut-off level of FEV1 per cent predicted (>80% or <80% of predicted). According to American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS)3 and Global Initiative on Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines,4 a presumptive diagnosis of COPD should be confirmed by spirometry. Meta-analysis of epidemiological investigations based on spirometry testing showed a COPD prevalence of 9–10%.5
The prevalence of physician diagnosed COPD is much lower than suggested by population based spirometric surveys: 1.5% in the UK6 and 3% in Canada.7 Thus only a fraction of those with COPD have been diagnosed (9.4%8 to 22%9). The aim of our study was to investigate in the primary care setting: (1) the prevalence and severity of COPD in adult patients; (2) the fraction already diagnosed and treated and (3) COPD risk factors.
The study was performed in Sierpc, Poland, a town with 20 000 inhabitants. There are no significant sources of air pollution in the town itself or within a perimeter of 50 km.
Investigations were performed in one of three primary care practices in Sierpc. This practice cares for both urban and rural populations. Two full time primary care physicians care for a total of 4730 registered patients (children and adults).
All patients registered at the primary care practice aged 40 years or more were invited to participate. Of the 2250 eligible adult patients, 967 (43%) were men; 1462 lived in Sierpc and 788 lived in a nearby village.
Full investigations were performed in 1960 patients, 87.1% of those eligible; 174 (7.7%) patients refused to participate, 90 (4%) were unable to attend (handicapped by stroke, with impaired mental functions, or poor performance status due to malignancy or other debilitating disease) and 26 (1.2%) patients were unable to perform valid spirometric tests. Age and sex structure of the participating patients did not differ from those of the population of Sierpc (see supplementary table 1 online).
Adult patients were recruited by personalised letter from the primary care physician explaining the nature and aim of the study. Causes, symptoms, signs and the natural history of COPD were described. The importance of early diagnosis for prevention of severe life threatening disease was emphasised. The higher risk of lung cancer, coronary artery disease and stroke in patients with abnormal spirometry results was also mentioned. A practice nurse then called eligible patients to arrange a convenient time for an office visit. A home visit was arranged for 80 patients who expressed difficulty coming to the office for the study.
Each visit started with weight and height measurements, and completion of a questionnaire with questions on details of birth, smoking habits, dyspnoea,10 education, economic status, environmental or professional exposure to dusts, fumes or smoke, and a history of respiratory diseases.
Spirometry testing was performed using a portable battery powered spirometer (EasyOne Diagnostic, model 2001; ndd Medical Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland). The spirometer measures flow using ultrasound transit time principles. Measurements were performed with the patient in a sitting position without a noseclip. Forced expiratory manoeuvres were repeated until three acceptable and reproducible tests were obtained.11 The best FEV1 and FVC were recorded, and the FEV1/FVC ratio was calculated. In patients with FEV1/FVC below the fifth percentile of the predicted value in baseline spirometry, 200 μg of salbutamol were given by inhalation delivered through a spacer device and spirometry was repeated 15 min later (post-BD).
Spirometry tests were performed by two primary care nurses who had been trained in two separate 4 h sessions in a reference lung function laboratory at the National Research Institute of TB and Lung Diseases in Warsaw, Poland. The results of spirometric tests (numbers, flow/volume and volume/time curves) were sent electronically to one of the authors (MB) for quality control. Overall, 91.8% of the tests fulfilled the ATS goals for a good quality test session. The remaining 8.2% of tests were also included in the analysis as they all showed results above predicted values and were accepted as normal. Staging of COPD using post-BD spirometry results was performed according to ATS/ERS guidelines3 using ECCS predicted values.12
The study was approved by the local institutional review board, and all participating patients gave written informed consent.
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistica V.6.0 software (StatSoft, Inc., V.2001, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA). Tests were considered significant when p<0.05. Data distribution was analysed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test with Lilliefors correction. Quantitative data were described using mean (SD). Between group characteristics were described using t tests or analysis of variance. Homogeneity of variance was assessed using Levene’s test. If a variable demonstrated normal distribution and homogenous variance, the F ANOVA test was applied. Otherwise, a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis H test was used. To characterise the strength of relationships between continuous variables, Pearson correlations were used. Categorised, qualitative, between groups analyses were performed using the Pearson χ2 test with appropriate corrections for N. Pre-test probability for post-BD airflow limitation was assessed using logistic regression models.
A total of 1960 patients were investigated, 87.1% of the eligible cohort. There were 1196 women (93% of eligible) and 764 men (79% of eligible) in the studied group (table 1). Mean age was 56.7 (11.6) years (range 40–93 in men and 40–91 in women). Approximately two-thirds of patients lived in town.
The pre-BD FEV1/FVC% was below the fifth percentile in 299 patients (15.3%). Airflow obstruction was present post-BD in 211 patients (29.4% fewer than pre-BD) (see supplementary figs 1 and 2 online). From 88 patients in whom the FEV1/FVC ratio returned to normal, 60% presented with mild and 40% with moderate airflow obstruction.
In all subjects with post-BD airflow obstruction, patients’ notes were inspected for a history of respiratory events in the past and earlier respiratory diagnoses. In 20 patients there was a history of asthma documented by attacks of dyspnoea, remissions, eosinophilia and in some patients positive results of prick tests. In eight patients, additional tests were performed (white blood differential count, IgE, prick test) confirming a diagnosis of asthma. Fourteen patients showed a large bronchodilating response. This was considered as suggestive of asthma but only in combination with other symptoms and signs. This resulted in separation of 28 patients with a diagnosis of asthma and airflow obstruction which was not fully reversible. COPD was diagnosed in 183 patients (9.3%) (12.8% of males and 7.1% of females). The mean increase in FEV1 post-BD was 1.2 (8.5)%. The majority of patients with COPD had mild (30.6%) or moderate (51.4%) disease. Only 15.3% had severe and 2.7% very severe disease (table 2). Ventilatory impairment in female COPD patients was less severe, with a mean FEV1% of predicted of 71 (18.3)% versus 64 (20)% in males (table 3).
The prevalence of COPD increased with age, from 5.2% in the fifth decade to 16.8% in patients aged 70 years or more, reaching 28.5% in males (fig 1). In women aged 70+ years, there was no further increase in COPD prevalence. Sixteen of 19 women in this age group were never smokers.
To analyse the pre-test probability for a COPD diagnosis, a model of logistic regression was applied. The analysis revealed a role for smoking status, exertional dyspnoea, chronic phlegm production and gender as potential indicators of COPD in primary care (table 4).
In 34 patients (18.6%), COPD had already been diagnosed; 27 presented with severe and four with very severe stage COPD. Two patients with severe and one patient with very severe disease had not been previously diagnosed. There was no patient who had previously been diagnosed with COPD but had normal post-BD spirometry. A restrictive pattern of ventilatory impairment was found in 108 (5.5%) patients (FEV1/FVC% above the fifth percentile and FVC <80% of predicted).
Patients diagnosed with COPD frequently had symptoms: chronic cough (45%), sputum production (38%) and dyspnoea on exertion (52.5%). Only 59 (32%) did not report any symptom. Dyspnoea Medical Research Council grade 1 was reported by 43 (23.5%), grade 2 by 36 (19.7%), grade 3 by 12 (6.6%) and grade 4 by five (2.7%) patients. Relations between symptoms, COPD stage and smoking status are shown in table 5. The frequency and number of symptoms increased with disease severity.
There was a large gender difference in smoking habits in the studied cohort. Only 23.3% of men were never smokers compared with 60% of women (table 1). This difference was even more pronounced in patients with COPD. Ninety-six per cent of men with COPD were ever smokers, with a mean tobacco exposure of 40 pack-years. Former smokers had a higher tobacco exposure (46.6 pack-years) than current smokers (35.5 pack-years). In female patients with COPD, 52% were never smokers. Of the women who had ever smoked, 13% were former smokers and 35% were current smokers, with a mean total tobacco exposure of 20 pack-years.
Initiation of smoking was earlier in men than in women (p<0.0001). The intensity of tobacco smoking (cigarettes smoked per day) was twice as high in males than in females (p<0.0001). Despite a lower cumulative exposure to nicotine in females, the difference in the Fagerström nicotine dependence test between males and females was lower than in tobacco exposure (p<0.001) (table 1).
Other risk factors
The relatively high prevalence of COPD in never smoking women led us to a post hoc case control survey on combustible material used by women for cooking (gas, coal or wood). Eighty-five never smoking women with COPD were compared with 85 age matched asymptomatic women with normal spirometry (healthy control subjects). Coal and wood material was used by 68.3% of women with COPD compared with 44.7% of healthy control subjects (p<0.003). Never smoking patients with COPD (both sexes) were older (p<0.0001), more frequently lived in rural areas (p<0.001) and were more likely to have been born prematurely (p<0.002) compared with patients with no respiratory problems.
There was a significant relation between risk of developing COPD and educational level. Three-quarters of patients with COPD received only primary education compared with half of patients with no respiratory symptoms (p<0.0001).
Low economic status was also associated with a higher risk of COPD compared with patients with no respiratory problems who more often declared satisfactory or good economic status (p<0.0001).
In patients aged 40 years or more, from this primary care practice, the prevalence of COPD was 9.3%. Only 19% of these patients had already been diagnosed and treated. Our results are strengthened by a high attendance rate (87%) and very high accuracy of spirometry tests (92% met ATS goals).
The results of our investigations are consistent with the results of epidemiological surveys of COPD in Poland. In a representative population sample of Warsaw, aged 42–71 years, COPD was diagnosed in 10.7%.13 In a study performed in Silesia, a heavy polluted industrial region of Poland, the prevalence of COPD in 19–69-year-old adults was 10.2%.14
We found a higher prevalence of severe COPD than reported in countrywide epidemiological surveys of COPD in adults. Fukuchi and colleagues8 found only 6% of adults with an FEV1 lower than 50% of predicted. Severe COPD was found in 13% of adults surveyed in Spain.9
We reduced overdiagnosis of COPD by using post-BD FEV1/FVC to diagnose COPD. There were other factors that may have prevented overdiagnosis of COPD, such as trained and supervised nurses, spirometer with quality grades and feedback. Others15 also reported a 27% lower prevalence of COPD by using post-BD spirometry instead of pre-BD spirometry (thereby excluding some people with asthma). We also reduced overdiagnosis of COPD by applying the fifth percentile of the FEV1/FVC as a lower limit of normal16 instead of a fixed 0.7 ratio.17 18
Our study did not confirm recent reports of a high prevalence of COPD among women.19 20 That finding may reflect patterns of smoking in Poland, with 40% of males compared with 23% of females smoking. In our study, COPD was diagnosed in 12.8% of men and 7.1% of women. Only 50% of women diagnosed with COPD were current or ex-smokers. Also, total exposure to tobacco smoke was 50% lower in women than in men.. However, use of coal and biomass fuel by almost 70% of women with COPD may have influenced the rate of COPD in women.21 Severe and very severe COPD (FEV1 <50% of predicted) was more than twice as frequent in men than in women (24.5% vs 11.7%). Proportions of men and women with COPD in our study were similar to those reported by recent surveys on COPD prevalence in five major Latin American cites22 and Norway.15
Spirometry in primary care
Our study confirmed that good quality spirometry testing can be accomplished in a primary care setting when several conditions are fulfilled. The spirometer model we selected met National Lung Health Education Program criteria for office spirometers, including instant manoeuvre quality checks and messages.23 This spirometer has been shown to retain long term accuracy.24 The two nurses performing the spirometry tests underwent two hands-on training courses in a reference pulmonary function laboratory. A strict quality assurance programme closely monitored and reported the quality of the test sessions.
Poor quality spirometry tests increase the risk of misinterpreting the results, causing unnecessary stress to patients because of falsely positive diagnoses. The cost and side effects of unnecessary treatment must also be considered. Low accuracy of spirometric tests in primary care was reported by Eaton and colleagues.25 However, more recent data from eight rural primary care practices in Canada showed good quality spirometry testing performed with a portable office spirometer.26 Under utilisation of spirometry in the diagnosis and management of COPD by primary care practitioners27 28 has led some experts to question the value of widespread COPD case finding by primary care physicians.29 However, proper training and monitoring of test quality may produce low misclassification rates in selected primary care settings.30 31
Widespread use of good quality spirometric testing in primary care would have a positive impact on the diagnosis, management and prevention of severe stages of COPD when disability is substantial, quality of life poor and costs of treatment very high.4 Approximately 80% of patients with COPD have mild or moderate disease. Early diagnosis allows many more years for successful anti-smoking activities,32 counselling and smoking cessation treatment.33 Smoking cessation counselling combined with spirometry testing was shown to increase the smoking cessation rate in COPD patients in some studies,34 35 but not in others.36 Long term follow-up of the Lung Health Study cohort has clearly shown that smoking cessation stops progression of the disease37 and reduces mortality.38
In many recent investigations on COPD detection by case finding in primary care, the percentage of newly diagnosed patients presenting with respiratory symptoms was strikingly high, attaining almost 50%.31 36 In our COPD group, 68% were symptomatic with at least one symptom (cough, phlegm or dyspnoea) reported. Those patients qualify for treatment that may result in a considerable reduction in symptoms, increase in exercise capacity and improvement in health related quality of life.
Patients with airflow limitation have a high risk of lung cancer,39 coronary artery disease40 and stroke.41 A large proportion of patients with COPD die from non-pulmonary diseases.42 43 Preventive measures should be undertaken. Early diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases may be especially rewarding.44
Smoking was by far the most important risk factor for COPD in these patients, especially in men. However, 52% of females with COPD never smoked. Looking for other potential risk factors in never smoking women, we found that they were using coal or wood for cooking significantly more often than women with normal lung function. Biomass fuels and coal used for cooking also account for COPD among non-smoking women in other regions of the world.21
Other COPD risk factors in some of the non-smoking women were passive exposure to cigarette smoke and heavy physical work in the farm in unfavourable weather conditions, resulting in frequent respiratory infections. Passive smoking45 and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections46 may contribute to development and progression of COPD.
Our data warn against screening for COPD limited to current or ex-smokers. Half of the women diagnosed with COPD never smoked. Analysis of the relation between smoking status and symptoms in all COPD patients showed that 77% of ever smokers were symptomatic compared with 23% in never smokers. However, among 44 never smoking women with COPD, 28 (64%) were symptomatic. By screening only smokers we would have missed a COPD diagnosis in 26% of cases. Screening only symptomatic patients would result in 32% missed cases.
Patients with COPD declared low income and low educational level significantly more often than patients with normal respiratory function. Low educational level was found to be an independent risk factor for COPD in several large studies.47 48
Our study has several limitations. We used ECCS predicted values for spirometry that were developed some decades ago and may not exactly fit for the current generation of adults in Poland. The recent prediction equations for Caucasian populations49 may have resulted in lower COPD prevalence rates. However, as ECCS predicted values are still widely used in Europe, we decided to follow a routine. Non-smoking status was not objectively verified. However, we believe that the investigated subjects’ declarations were true.
Our results may not apply to other communities or countries. Good quality spirometry testing may remain a problem in some primary care settings, despite physician and nurse training programmes.
In summary, our study confirmed that COPD affected approximately 9% of the adult patients seen in a primary care setting in Poland. However, the disease was largely underdiagnosed without spirometry: only patients with severe disease (FEV1 <50% predicted) had been diagnosed and treated. Large numbers of newly detected patients were symptomatic and needed treatment. Limiting screening to smokers would have reduced the number of COPD diagnoses by 26%. COPD case finding should be done using office spirometry in high risk patients, smokers and subjects with respiratory symptoms.
Funding: Investigations were funded by Polish Ministry of Science Grant No 2PO5D08727.
Competing interests: None.
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the local institutional review board.