You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Genetic variation and gene expression in antioxidant related enzymes and risk of COPD: a systematic review
Free
  1. A R Bentley,
  2. P Emrani,
  3. P A Cassano
  1. Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
  1. Dr P A Cassano, Division of Nutritional Sciences, 209 Savage Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA; pac6{at}cornell.edu

Abstract

Background: Observational epidemiological studies of dietary antioxidant intake, serum antioxidant concentration and lung outcomes suggest that lower levels of antioxidant defences are associated with decreased lung function. Another approach to understanding the role of oxidant/antioxidant imbalance in the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is to investigate the role of genetic variation in antioxidant enzymes, and indeed family based studies suggest a heritable component to lung disease. Many studies of the genes encoding antioxidant enzymes have considered COPD or COPD related outcomes, and a systematic review is needed to summarise the evidence to date, and to provide insights for further research.

Methods: Genetic association studies of antioxidant enzymes and COPD/COPD related traits, and comparative gene expression studies with disease or smoking as the exposure were systematically identified and reviewed. Antioxidant enzymes considered included enzymes involved in glutathione metabolism, in the thioredoxin system, superoxide dismutases (SOD) and catalase.

Results: A total of 29 genetic association and 15 comparative gene expression studies met the inclusion criteria. The strongest and most consistent effects were in the genes GCL, GSTM1, GSTP1 and SOD3. This review also highlights the lack of studies for genes of interest, particularly GSR, GGT and those related to TXN. There were limited opportunities to evaluate the contribution of a gene to disease risk through synthesis of results from different study designs, as the majority of studies considered either association of sequence variants with disease or effect of disease on gene expression.

Conclusion: Network driven approaches that consider potential interaction between and among genes, smoke exposure and antioxidant intake are needed to fully characterise the role of oxidant/antioxidant balance in pathogenesis.

https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2007.086199

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterised by the development of airflow limitation that is not fully reversible. COPD is a major, and growing, public health burden.1

    Smoking is the most important risk factor for COPD; however, there is considerable variation in the response to smoke exposure,2 and it has been estimated that only 15% of the variation in lung function is explained by smoking parameters.3 While not discounting the paramount importance of smoke exposure in the development of COPD, clearly other factors are significant. Genetic variation is a prime candidate, and many recent studies explore the contribution of genetic variation to interindividual differences in the response to cigarette smoke.

    This review focuses on genes related to antioxidant activity, as oxidant-rich cigarette smoke strains the antioxidant defences of the lungs, leading to direct tissue damage and contributing to the inflammation and antiprotease inactivation seen in COPD. This hypothesis is supported by epidemiological studies associating low dietary antioxidant intake and serum antioxidant concentration with decreased lung function4–9 and increased COPD mortality risk.10

    Many genetic association studies and comparative expression studies investigated the relation between genes coding for antioxidant enzymes and either COPD or associated traits. An overview of the evidence is warranted to ascertain whether the pattern of published results suggests directions for future research, or whether there are apparent gaps that need to be addressed. Both genetic association studies and gene expression studies were included: polymorphisms can affect disease risk in ways that may or may not be mediated by changes in expression, and expression studies can provide a snapshot of the adaptive response to an exposure. Thus we conducted a systematic review of the literature to characterise the evidence that genes coding for antioxidant enzymes contribute to the aetiology of COPD and related traits.

    METHODS

    The selection of genes was based mainly on delineating important proteins and the networks of genes that may influence the amount or function of those proteins (fig 1). As glutathione (GSH) is an antioxidant that plays a significant role in the lung, genes encoding GSH associated enzymes were selected. Thioredoxin, which reduces oxidised glutathione and has an antioxidant function that overlaps GSH function, was included with genes encoding associated enzymes. Catalase and superoxide dismutase, two classical antioxidant enzymes of the lung, were also selected. Searches of PubMed were performed up to August 2007 (further details are available online). Published papers considering gene–disease association or differential gene expression in adult humans were selected. Association studies were included if the outcome was disease or lung function. Expression studies were included if the experimental exposure was disease status or smoking and if expression was measured in pulmonary tissues or cells.

    Figure 1
    Figure 1 Interaction of antioxidant enzymes in response to oxidative stress. *This reaction also occurs without the listed enzyme. CAT, catalase; cys, cysteine; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GCL, glutamate–cysteine ligase; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transferase; glu, glutamate; gly, glycine; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; GRX, glutaredoxin; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSR, glutathione reductase; GSS, glutathione synthetase; GSSG, oxidised glutathione; GST, glutathione S-transferase; NADP+, oxidised nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NADPH, reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; PRDX, peroxiredoxin; R-S2, disulphide (could be mixed disulphides or glutathionylated proteins); R-SH2, reduced thiol; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TXNox, oxidised thioredoxin; TXNred, reduced thioredoxin; TXNRD, thioredoxin reductase.

    RESULTS

    A total of 29 genetic association studies and 14 expression studies were identified (see supplementary table 1 online).

    Glutathione synthesis

    Three enzymes that relate to glutathione synthesis were considered: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT, no studies found), glutamate–cysteine ligase (GCL) and glutathione synthetase (GSS). A substitution in the promoter region of GCLM (the modulatory subunit of GCL), leading to decreased glutathione levels,11 was associated with a threefold increased risk of COPD in Chinese smokers.12 In the single study of a substitution in the catalytic subunit of GCL (GCLC) that results in decreased expression,13 an increased prevalence was observed in patients compared with healthy controls (odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 3.36)).14

    Expression studies of glutathione synthesis compared expression in patients with COPD with asymptomatic smokers and/or non-smokers. Eight of the nine comparisons of GCLC expression in lung epithelium found upregulation with disease.15–18 Two comparisons of GCLM expression in lung epithelium of patients with lung tumour with and without COPD showed decreased GCLM expression with disease,17 while the single study of patients with COPD without lung tumour found upregulation.18

    There were four comparisons of GCL expression in lung epithelium of asymptomatic smokers and non-smokers: expression of both subunits was increased in smokers who were healthy volunteers18 19 and unchanged or decreased in smokers with lung tumour.17

    Expression of the GCL subunits in alveolar macrophages/inflammatory cells showed a more consistent pattern. Both GCLC16 17 20 and GCLM20 were increased in patients with COPD compared with smokers, and smokers had lower expression of both subunits compared with non-smokers.17 20 A 27% upregulation of the mRNA of GSS, the final step of GSH synthesis, was reported in smokers compared with non-smokers (p = 0.08),19 but was not replicated in comparisons with non-smokers with either asymptomatic smokers or patients with COPD.18 19

    Antioxidant activity of GSH and recycling

    Glutathione peroxidase (GPX), glutaredoxin (GLRX), glutathione reductase (GSR) and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) were considered for their role in the antioxidant activity of GSH and in GSH recycling. There were no association studies of variants in these genes.

    Two studies evaluated expression in patients with COPD compared with healthy controls. In the single study of GPX2, it was strongly upregulated in patients with COPD at all stages compared with non-smokers (and modestly upregulated compared with smokers).18 GPX3 was upregulated in patients with COPD compared with non-smokers, although this difference was not seen in comparison with asymptomatic smokers.18 21 There was little evidence of differential regulation of GPX4, GPX5 or GPX7 by disease status.18

    GPX2 showed a 3–5-fold upregulation in epithelial cells of smokers compared with non-smokers.18 19 Each of the four studies of GPX3 expression in epithelial cells reported upregulation in smokers: two studies found a twofold difference19 22 and a study of alveolar macrophages reported similar differences.22

    Two expression studies evaluated regulation of GLRX. A statistically significant downregulation was observed in the tissue homogenate of patients with COPD compared with smokers (patients had either resection for lung tumour or lung transplantation for severe COPD),23 but similar results were not observed in an analysis of bronchial epithelial cells.18 A statistically significant upregulation of GLRX in the sputum of patients with COPD in exacerbation was reported compared with non-smokers.23

    The sole comparison of GSR expression in epithelial cells by disease groups showed upregulation in patients with COPD.18 In the two comparisons by smoking status, upregulation was observed among smokers.18 19 Very similar results were found in the three studies of G6PD expression: twofold upregulation in epithelial cells18 19 and in alveolar macrophages.24

    In agreement with biological networks, the four expression studies that considered GPX (GPX1, GPX2 and GPX3), GSR and G6PD all showed upregulation of each of these genes with smoking.

    GSH conjugation and export

    There were 24 association and four expression studies of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), which play a role in GSH conjugation and export.

    Homozygous deletion of GSTM1, resulting in a complete lack of activity,25 was associated with increased COPD risk in three of seven association studies (range in OR 2.2 to 8.0).26–28 The prevalence of the deletion was increased in patients with emphysema compared with non-diseased participants,29 30 although no association was observed with emphysematous changes in heavy smokers.31 Both studies of chronic bronchitis reported a threefold increased risk associated with the null genotype.32 33

    Five studies investigated the association of the GSTM1 deletion with COPD related quantitative traits. Conflicting evidence was reported: one of two studies of the rate of decline of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) reported an association in men only34 and one of three studies of FEV1% predicted reported lower lung function with the null genotype.35 In a single study of forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted, the null genotype was significantly associated with decreased lung function.35 However, it was not associated with an increased rate of FVC decline.34 The null genotype was associated with a steeper rate of forced expiratory flow (FEF)25−75 decline (among men) in one study.34

    In GSTP1, the Ile105Val substitution, which causes altered affinity for specific substrates,36 was associated with COPD related outcomes. A protective effect of the heterozygous genotype was reported in seven of 11 studies of patients with COPD compared with asymptomatic participants; the magnitude of the effect varied and was statistically significant in two studies.37 38 A study of smokers with emphysematous changes (compared with normal smokers) reported a protective effect of heterozygosity.31 However, seven of 10 studies of the homozygous variant genotype in relation to COPD risk reported an increased risk: the difference was statistically significant in one study39 and four estimates were based on small numbers.

    The Ile105Val genotype had little or no relation to the rate of decline in FEV1, although the direction of effect was consistent with the hypothesis: risk was increased in those homozygous for the variant allele.34 Greater effect sizes were found for risk of being in the tails of the FEV1% predicted distribution,40 but there was little or no continuous relation with FEV1% predicted.41

    A GSTP1 polymorphism with unknown biological effect (Ala114Val) was investigated in three studies. One study of Indian smokers observed a statistically significant graded increase in the prevalence of COPD with the variant allele,39 but a similar association with emphysema risk was not observed in an American population.30 In three comparisons of lung function within disease groups, statistically significantly lower lung function was observed with the variant allele in patients with COPD,39 but not in patients with emphysema41 or asymptomatic smokers.39

    There was little or no association of a homozygous deletion of GSTT1 with COPD risk; three of four studies reported a slightly decreased risk of disease with the null genotype, but the interval estimates of the effect were wide. There was no association of GSTT1 null and risk of emphysematous changes in smokers.31 Three of four studies of lung function reported an association: the null genotype was associated with a steeper decline in FEV1 in a general population,42 with steeper decline in FEV1, FVC and FEF25−75 among men,34 and with an increased risk of being in the lowest compared with the highest group of %predicted FEV1.40 The only study of mGST1 found no association between four markers and FEV1 % predicted.41

    There were three studies of gene expression differences by disease group. Upregulation of GSTM3 and mGST1 expression was observed in patients with COPD.18 GSTO1 was significantly downregulated in the single study of lung tissue and sputum from patients with COPD with lung tumour,43 but was upregulated in the epithelial cells of patients with COPD only (less severe stages).18 Four studies investigated the expression of GSTs by smoking status. Both studies of GSTA1 expression showed upregulation among smokers in lung tissue.18 21 Statistically significant upregulation was associated with smoking in a single study of GSTA2.19 GSTM3 expression was increased among smokers to the same extent (approximately 50%) in both studies of epithelial cells.18 19 There was some evidence of upregulation of mGST1 among smokers in two studies.18 19 In six of seven comparisons of GSTO1 expression in various lung tissues, expression was unrelated to smoking.

    Thioredoxin metabolism

    Thioredoxin metabolism was evaluated by considering the enzymes thioredoxin (TXN), thioredoxin reductase (TXNRD) and peroxiredoxin (PRDX). No association studies and two expression studies were found. A single study considering epithelial cell expression in COPD compared with non-diseased reported upregulation of TXN, TXNRD1 and PRDX1 with disease and downregulation of PRDX5 with disease.18 Both studies of expression by smoking status reported increased expression of TXN and TXNRD1 with smoking.18 19 In the study that also evaluated peroxiredoxins, PRDX1 was upregulated and PRDX3 and PRDX5 were both downregulated in smokers.18

    Other enzymes

    Two classic antioxidants, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), were considered. Three association studies (evaluating five variants) and six expression studies were identified.

    There was no association between an intronic single nucleotide polymorphism SNP in SOD1 and COPD. SOD2 Val16Ala was associated with disease in a Chinese population,44 but not in persons of European descent.45 The association between SOD3 Arg213Gly and COPD was studied in two large populations.45 46 Heterozygosity was associated with a strong, statistically significant decreased risk of disease (∼40–75% reduction)45 46 and a 70% reduction in risk of COPD hospitalisation or death during follow-up.46 Genotype was not associated with lung function in a general population, but FEV1/FVC ratio was higher among smokers with the heterozygous genotype (p = 0.04).46 There were no homozygous variants among diseased individuals in either study, precluding odds ratio calculation.

    Three studies of SOD expression compared patients with COPD with healthy controls. SOD activity was increased in the bronchial lavage fluid of non-smokers with COPD compared with smokers with COPD and healthy controls.47 No evidence of differential expression by disease status was seen in three studies of SOD1.18 21 48 In the six comparisons of SOD2 in patients with lung tumour with COPD versus controls, COPD was associated with increased SOD2 concentration.21 48 An increase in expression was not observed in the single study of patients with COPD without lung tumour.18 Neither of the studies of SOD3 expression in disease groups provided strong evidence for differential regulation by disease.18 21

    Little or no evidence of differential expression of SOD1 and SOD3 by smoking status was observed. SOD2 was upregulated in smokers compared with non-smokers in three comparisons of epithelial cells (with one showing strong, significant upregulation) and downregulated in three other comparisons. SOD2 was also upregulated in lung tissue homogenate and alveolar macrophages, but downregulated in the pulmonary blood vessels of smokers compared with non-smokers.

    Two studies evaluated polymorphisms in CAT, but provided no strong evidence for an association of two promoter region single nucleotide polymorphisms with disease risk.44 45 Two studies compared CAT expression in disease groups, with little evidence for differential regulation by COPD status, although statistically significant downregulation was observed in patients with lung tumour with COPD in one study.21 Three studies compared CAT expression by smoking status, with inconsistent results.

    Gene–gene interaction

    Increased risk of COPD, and decreased FEV1 % predicted among patients with COPD, was reported for various genotype combinations that included either GSTP1 105Val or 114Val compared with wild-type for both polymorphisms (OR 1.99 for COPD risk; 95% CI 1.28 to 3.09).39 In an analysis of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null and GSTP1 Ile105Val, most combinations of the “higher risk” genotypes were associated with an increased risk of disease, with the strongest associations observed with the GSTP1 105Ile allele and the null genotype for either GSTM1 (OR 11.3; 95% CI 1.3 to 98.6) or GSTT1 (OR 12.1; 95% CI 1.3 to 116.96).37 Although the combination of GSTM1 null, GSTT1 null and GSTP1 105Ile was not associated with COPD risk in another study,49 it was associated with steeper lung function decline (p = 0.026)40 and risk of rapid decline in lung function (OR 2.83; 95% CI 1.1 to 7.2).42 Men with the null genotype for both GSTM1 and GSTT1 had 8.3 ml/year greater decline in FEV1 compared with those with at least one copy of both (p<0.001), with similar results reported for both FVC and FEF25−75.34 The National Emphysema Treatment Trial reported little or no association between combinations of GSTM1 null and GSTP1 105Ile and disease.30 There was little or no association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes and emphysematous changes in Japanese heavy smokers.31 The combination of GSTM1 null, GSTP1 105 Ile/Ile and at least one slow allele for microsomal epoxide hydrolase increased the risk of COPD (OR 6.8; 95% CI 1.6 to 17.2).26 The combination of GSTM1 null and a matrix metalloproteinase 9 polymorphism increased the risk of COPD by about eightfold (OR 7.7; 95% CI 1.1 to 53.3).27

    DISCUSSION

    Observational epidemiological evidence suggests a role for nutrients contributing to antioxidant function in the prevention of lung disease.4–9 Whether these findings reflect underlying biological mechanisms or methodological bias (eg, confounding) is unclear. Consideration of genetic variants that affect antioxidant/oxidant balance and that may be sensitive to dietary intake of antioxidants can help address this question. The study of genetic variants affecting antioxidant capacity allows an unbiased approach, in comparison with observational studies of diet, based in part on the principles of Mendelian randomisation.50 Thus this review was designed to evaluate the evidence that antioxidant enzyme function and/or regulation is related to COPD risk.

    This systematic review included studies that addressed gene–disease associations as well as those that evaluated differences in gene expression. There were limited opportunities to synthesise results from both approaches as genes were often considered either in association studies or in expression studies, yet such synthesis may reveal complementary data.51 For example, a variant allele that leads to decreased glutathione was associated with an increased risk of COPD among smokers,12 and an expression study of GCLM reported upregulation in smokers.19 The combined results support the hypothesis that increasing available glutathione in persons with a high oxidant load may protect against lung damage. Lack of agreement between association and gene expression studies may also be informative. While association studies suggest a protective effect of heterozygosity for the GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism in COPD, no differences in expression of GSTP1 were reported in smokers compared with non-smokers, suggesting that the effect of the genotype is not mediated through mRNA quantity.

    Comparisons with animal studies provide an additional context in which to interpret the findings from human studies, but caution is warranted. Mice and adult rats (in contrast with humans) synthesise ascorbate,52 which protects GSH from oxidation and reduces it from its disulphide form.53 The interaction between ascorbate and other antioxidants suggests that animal studies of genetic manipulation or oxidant insult may not be predictive of results in humans. While two human studies of GSR expression reported significantly increased mRNA expression in the airway epithelial cells of asymptomatic smokers,18 19 findings in smoke exposed rats were mainly negative.54–56 Reduction of GSSG by endogenously formed ascorbate may blunt the rat’s need for GSR to perform the same function.

    This review reveals very few instances where the evidence base contains enough information to make a strong statement of effect, but a few examples deserve mention. The GSTM1 null genotype (no enzyme activity) was consistently associated with increased COPD risk.26–29 32–35 37 57 A substitution in another GST, GSTP1 Ile105Val, which affects catalytic activity and binding affinity for particular substrates, was consistently inversely associated with disease.31 34 37 38 40 58–60 A rare substitution in SOD3, which increases plasma SOD levels, was also associated with a significantly decreased COPD risk,45 46 a result supported by an animal study: transgenic mice overexpressing human SOD3 had attenuated lung damage and inflammatory response in hyperoxic conditions.61 In addition, there was simultaneous upregulation of GSR, GPX and G6PD in the airway epithelial cells of smokers,19 highlighting the importance of a network of genes in the response of the lung to oxidative stress.

    Several elements of the selected interrelated pathways have received minimal or no attention in human studies to date. For example, targeted disruption of the TXN gene produced early embryo lethality in mice,62 63 and transgenic mice overexpressing human TXN1 had increased survival and decreased hydroxyl radical production during exposure to diesel exhaust particles.64 The two studies of TXN related enzymes in humans reported upregulation of TXNRD1 and TXN in the airway epithelial cells of smokers and those with COPD18 19: further investigation is warranted. Other understudied genes of interest include GGT, PRDX6 and GLRX. GGT is the key enzyme in one pathway for the intracellular supply of cysteine for GSH synthesis: GGT deficient mice show a reduced ability for de novo synthesis65 and decreased intracellular GSH concentration.66 Furthermore, pulmonary GGT activity was increased during hyperoxia in rats,67 and GGT deficient mice had worse survival in hyperoxic conditions.65 66 PRDX6 is a peroxiredoxin that uses GSH as a cofactor. PRDX6 null mice had more severe lung injury and significantly decreased survival in conditions of hyperoxia compared with wild-type.68 Transgenic mice overexpressing PRDX6 had greater survival and attenuated lung damage in hyperoxia.69 Finally, GLRX comprises part of a major thiol disulphide redox buffer in the cell. The activity of this enzyme suggests a possible role in relation to the oxidation of GSH and the redox status of the cell, recommending it for further study.

    Several methodological considerations deserve mention. COPD aetiology is expected to include gene–environment interactions, given the clear role of smoking in this disease and the interindividual differences in response to cigarette smoke. Thus comparison groups must be carefully selected with regard to smoke exposure. In association studies in which the non-diseased group is comprised of non-smokers and the diseased group of smokers, for instance, the estimate of a true effect may be diluted. Similarly, in expression studies, a comparison between individuals with equivalent exposures, but whose disease outcome differed, may be most informative. Studies published in other languages were included to avoid the “Tower of Babel error”.70 A comprehensive set of enzymes based on biological networks were the starting point for the review, however our selections may have led to inadvertent omission of relevant enzymes. Disturbances in a broad range of redox related enzymes are likely to affect disease risk, suggesting that complex interactions cannot be ignored. A broader network approach may ultimately lead to more robust epidemiological findings.

    In conclusion, the evidence summarised in this review supports the continued investigation of the hypothesis that variation in genes that code for enzymes that can alter the redox environment of the lungs may contribute to COPD risk. Future directions suggested by this summary are: more network driven approaches that include broader consideration of enzymes whose related, redundant and linked activities might alter disease risk, further integration of association and expression studies to determine the nature of the biological relationships that may lead to disease, and careful consideration, in both study design and analysis, of environmental exposures (eg, smoking and nutritional status) that are likely to modify the gene–disease associations.

    REFERENCES

    1. ↵
      1. Lopez AD,
      2. Murray CC
      . The global burden of disease, 1990–2020. Nat Med 1998;4:1241–3.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Fletcher CM
      . The natural history of chronic bronchitis and emphysema: an eight-year study of early chronic obstructive lung disease in working men in London. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976.
    3. ↵
      1. Beck GJ,
      2. Doyle CA,
      3. Schachter EN
      . Smoking and lung function. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981;123:149–55.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    4. ↵
      1. Butland BK,
      2. Fehily AM,
      3. Elwood PC
      . Diet, lung function, and lung function decline in a cohort of 2512 middle aged men. Thorax 2000;55:102–8.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Ochs-Balcom HM,
      2. Grant BJ,
      3. Muti P<,
      4. et al.
      Antioxidants, oxidative stress, and pulmonary function in individuals diagnosed with asthma or COPD. Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60:991–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Grievink L,
      2. Smit HA,
      3. Ocke MC<,
      4. et al.
      Dietary intake of antioxidant (pro)-vitamins, respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function: the MORGEN study. Thorax 1998;53:166–71.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Hu G,
      2. Zhang X,
      3. Chen J<,
      4. et al.
      Dietary vitamin C intake and lung function in rural China. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:594–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
      1. Tabak C,
      2. Smit HA,
      3. Heederik D<,
      4. et al.
      Diet and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: independent beneficial effects of fruits, whole grains, and alcohol (the MORGEN study). Clin Exp Allergy 2001;31:747–55.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    9. ↵
      1. McKeever TM,
      2. Scrivener S,
      3. Broadfield E<,
      4. et al.
      Prospective study of diet and decline in lung function in a general population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1299–303.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    10. ↵
      1. Walda IC,
      2. Tabak C,
      3. Smit HA<,
      4. et al.
      Diet and 20-year chronic obstructive pulmonary disease mortality in middle-aged men from three European countries. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002;56:638–43.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    11. ↵
      1. Nakamura S,
      2. Kugiyama K,
      3. Sugiyama S<,
      4. et al.
      Polymorphism in the 5′-flanking region of human glutamate-cysteine ligase modifier subunit gene is associated with myocardial infarction. Circulation 2002;105:2968–73.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    12. ↵
      1. Hu RC,
      2. Tan SX,
      3. Dai AG
      . The relationship between the polymorphism of glutamate cysteine ligase modulatory subunit gene and the susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2006;29:100–3.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    13. ↵
      1. Koide S,
      2. Kugiyama K,
      3. Sugiyama S<,
      4. et al.
      Association of polymorphism in glutamate-cysteine ligase catalytic subunit gene with coronary vasomotor dysfunction and myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:539–45.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Liu S,
      2. Li B,
      3. Zhou Y<,
      4. et al.
      Genetic analysis of CC16, OGG1 and GCLC polymorphisms and susceptibility to COPD. Respirology 2007;12:29–33.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      1. Rahman I,
      2. van Schadewijk AA,
      3. Hiemstra PS<,
      4. et al.
      Localization of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase messenger RNA expression in lungs of smokers and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Free Radic Biol Med 2000;28:920–5.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    16. ↵
      1. Lin SD,
      2. Dai AG,
      3. Xu P
      . Changes of the activity and expression of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2005;28:97–101.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    17. ↵
      1. Harju T,
      2. Kaarteenaho-Wiik R,
      3. Soini Y<,
      4. et al.
      Diminished immunoreactivity of gamma-glutamylcysteine synthetase in the airways of smokers’ lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:754–9.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    18. ↵
      1. Pierrou S,
      2. Broberg P,
      3. O’Donnell RA<,
      4. et al.
      Expression of genes involved in oxidative stress responses in airway epithelial cells of smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:577–86.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Hackett NR,
      2. Heguy A,
      3. Harvey BG<,
      4. et al.
      Variability of antioxidant-related gene expression in the airway epithelium of cigarette smokers. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2003;29:331–43.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    20. ↵
      1. Neurohr C,
      2. Lenz AG,
      3. Ding I<,
      4. et al.
      Glutamate-cysteine ligase modulatory subunit in BAL alveolar macrophages of healthy smokers. Eur Respir J 2003;22:82–7.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    21. ↵
      1. Tomaki M,
      2. Sugiura H,
      3. Koarai A<,
      4. et al.
      Decreased expression of antioxidant enzymes and increased expression of chemokines in COPD lung. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2007;20:596–605.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Comhair SA,
      2. Thomassen MJ,
      3. Erzurum SC
      . Differential induction of extracellular glutathione peroxidase and nitric oxide synthase 2 in airways of healthy individuals exposed to 100% O(2) or cigarette smoke. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2000;23:350–4.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      1. Peltoniemi MJ,
      2. Rytila PH,
      3. Harju TH<,
      4. et al.
      Modulation of glutaredoxin in the lung and sputum of cigarette smokers and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Respir Res 2006;7:133.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    24. ↵
      1. Heguy A,
      2. O’Connor TP,
      3. Luettich K<,
      4. et al.
      Gene expression profiling of human alveolar macrophages of phenotypically normal smokers and nonsmokers reveals a previously unrecognized subset of genes modulated by cigarette smoking. J Mol Med 2006;84:318–28.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    25. ↵
      1. Xu S,
      2. Wang Y,
      3. Roe B<,
      4. et al.
      Characterization of the human class Mu glutathione S-transferase gene cluster and the GSTM1 deletion. J Biol Chem 1998;273:3517–27.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Cheng SL,
      2. Yu CJ,
      3. Chen CJ<,
      4. et al.
      Genetic polymorphism of epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase in COPD. Eur Respir J 2004;23:818–24.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    27. ↵
      1. Yanchina ED,
      2. Ivchik TV,
      3. Shvarts EI<,
      4. et al.
      Gene–gene interactions between glutathione-S transferase M1 and matrix metalloproteinase 9 in the formation of hereditary predisposition to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Bull Exp Biol Med 2004;137:64–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    28. ↵
      1. Dialyna IA,
      2. Miyakis S,
      3. Georgatou N<,
      4. et al.
      Genetic polymorphisms of CYP1A1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes and lung cancer risk. Oncol Rep 2003;10:1829–35.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    29. ↵
      1. Harrison DJ,
      2. Cantlay AM,
      3. Rae F<,
      4. et al.
      Frequency of glutathione S-transferase M1 deletion in smokers with emphysema and lung cancer. Hum Exp Toxicol 1997;16:356–60.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    30. ↵
      1. Hersh CP,
      2. Demeo DL,
      3. Lange C<,
      4. et al.
      Attempted replication of reported chronic obstructive pulmonary disease candidate gene associations. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2005;33:71–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    31. ↵
      1. Budhi A,
      2. Hiyama K,
      3. Isobe T<,
      4. et al.
      Genetic susceptibility for emphysematous changes of the lung in Japanese. Int J Mol Med 2003;11:321–9.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Baranova H,
      2. Perriot J,
      3. Albuisson E<,
      4. et al.
      Peculiarities of the GSTM1 0/0 genotype in French heavy smokers with various types of chronic bronchitis. Hum Genet 1997;99:822–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    33. ↵
      1. Baranov VS,
      2. Ivaschenko T,
      3. Bakay B<,
      4. et al.
      Proportion of the GSTM1 0/0 genotype in some Slavic populations and its correlation with cystic fibrosis and some multifactorial diseases. Hum Genet 1996;97:516–20.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    34. ↵
      1. Imboden M,
      2. Downs SH,
      3. Senn O<,
      4. et al.
      Glutathione S-transferase genotypes modify lung function decline in the general population: SAPALDIA cohort study. Respir Res 2007;8:2.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    35. ↵
      1. Tkacova R,
      2. Salagovic J,
      3. Ceripkova M<,
      4. et al.
      Glutathione S-transferase M1 gene polymorphism is related to COPD in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2004;116:131–4.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    36. ↵
      1. Zimniak P,
      2. Nanduri B,
      3. Pikula S<,
      4. et al.
      Naturally occurring human glutathione S-transferase GSTP1-1 isoforms with isoleucine and valine in position 104 differ in enzymic properties. Eur J Biochem 1994;224:893–9.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    37. ↵
      1. Calikoglu M,
      2. Tamer L,
      3. Ates Aras N<,
      4. et al.
      The association between polymorphic genotypes of glutathione S-transferases and COPD in the Turkish population. Biochem Genet 2006;44:307–19.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    38. ↵
      1. Ishii T,
      2. Matsuse T,
      3. Teramoto S<,
      4. et al.
      Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) polymorphism in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax 1999;54:693–6.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    39. ↵
      1. Vibhuti A,
      2. Arif E,
      3. Deepak D<,
      4. et al.
      Genetic polymorphisms of GSTP1 and mEPHX correlate with oxidative stress markers and lung function in COPD. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;359:136–42.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    40. ↵
      1. He JQ,
      2. Connett JE,
      3. Anthonisen NR<,
      4. et al.
      Glutathione S-transferase variants and their interaction with smoking on lung function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:388–94.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    41. ↵
      1. Hersh CP,
      2. Demeo DL,
      3. Lazarus R<,
      4. et al.
      Genetic association analysis of functional impairment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:977–84.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    42. ↵
      1. He JQ,
      2. Ruan J,
      3. Connett JE<,
      4. et al.
      Antioxidant gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to a rapid decline in lung function in smokers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:323–8.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    43. ↵
      1. Harju TH,
      2. Peltoniemi MJ,
      3. Rytila PH<,
      4. et al.
      Glutathione S-transferase omega in the lung and sputum supernatants of COPD patients. Respir Res 2007;8:48.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    44. ↵
      1. Mak JC,
      2. Ho SP,
      3. Yu WC<,
      4. et al.
      Polymorphisms and functional activity in SOD and catalase genes in smokers with COPD. Eur Respir J 2007;30:684–90.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    45. ↵
      1. Young RP,
      2. Hopkins R,
      3. Black PN<,
      4. et al.
      Functional variants of antioxidant genes in smokers with COPD and in those with normal lung function. Thorax 2006;61:394–9.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    46. ↵
      1. Juul K,
      2. Tybjaerg-Hansen A<,
      3. et al.
      Genetically increased antioxidative protection and decreased chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:858–64.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    47. ↵
      1. Yigla M,
      2. Berkovich Y,
      3. Nagler RM
      . Oxidative stress indices in COPD–bronchoalveolar lavage and salivary analysis. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:36–43.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    48. ↵
      1. Harju T,
      2. Kaarteenaho-Wiik R,
      3. Sirvio R<,
      4. et al.
      Manganese superoxide dismutase is increased in the airways of smokers’ lungs. Eur Respir J 2004;24:765–71.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    49. ↵
      1. Chan-Yeung M,
      2. Ho SP,
      3. Cheung AH<,
      4. et al.
      Polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase genes and functional activity in smokers with or without COPD. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2007;11:508–14.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    50. ↵
      1. Davey Smith G,
      2. Ebrahim S
      . ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:1–22.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    51. ↵
      1. Li J,
      2. Burmeister M
      . Genetical genomics: combining genetics with gene expression analysis. Hum Mol Genet 2005;14(Spec No 2):R163–9.
    52. ↵
      1. Banhegyi G,
      2. Braun L,
      3. Csala M<,
      4. et al.
      Ascorbate metabolism and its regulation in animals. Free Radic Biol Med 1997;23:793–803.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    53. ↵
      1. Meister A
      . Glutathione–ascorbic acid antioxidant system in animals. J Biol Chem 1994;269:9397–400.
      OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    54. ↵
      1. York GK,
      2. Peirce TH,
      3. Schwartz LW<,
      4. et al.
      Stimulation by cigarette smoke of glutathione peroxidase system enzyme activities in rat lung. Arch Environ Health 1976;31:286–90.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
      1. Joshi UM,
      2. Kodavanti PR,
      3. Mehendale HM
      . Glutathione metabolism and utilization of external thiols by cigarette smoke-challenged, isolated rat and rabbit lungs. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 1988;96:324–35.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    56. ↵
      1. Gupta MP,
      2. Khanduja KL,
      3. Sharma RR
      . Effect of cigarette smoke inhalation on antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in the rat. Toxicol Lett 1988;41:107–14.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    57. ↵
      1. Korytina GF,
      2. Iaibaeva DG,
      3. Viktorova TV
      . Polymorphism of glutathione-S-transferase M1 and P1 genes in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic respiratory tract diseases. Genetika 2004;40:401–8.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    58. ↵
      1. Lu B,
      2. He Q
      . Correlation between exon5 polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene and susceptibility to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in northern Chinese population of Han nationality living in Beijing, China. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 2002;41:678–81.
      OpenUrlPubMed
      1. Rodriguez F,
      2. de la Roza C,
      3. Jardi R<,
      4. et al.
      Glutathione S-transferase P1 and lung function in patients with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency and COPD. Chest 2005;127:1537–43.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    60. ↵
      1. Yim JJ,
      2. Yoo CG,
      3. Lee CT<,
      4. et al.
      Lack of association between glutathione S-transferase P1 polymorphism and COPD in Koreans. Lung 2002;180:119–25.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    61. ↵
      1. Folz RJ,
      2. Abushamaa AM,
      3. Suliman HB
      . Extracellular superoxide dismutase in the airways of transgenic mice reduces inflammation and attenuates lung toxicity following hyperoxia. J Clin Invest 1999;103:1055–66.
      OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
    62. ↵
      1. Matsui M,
      2. Oshima M,
      3. Oshima H<,
      4. et al.
      Early embryonic lethality caused by targeted disruption of the mouse thioredoxin gene. Dev Biol 1996;178:179–85.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    63. ↵
      1. Nonn L,
      2. Williams RR,
      3. Erickson RP<,
      4. et al.
      The absence of mitochondrial thioredoxin 2 causes massive apoptosis, exencephaly, and early embryonic lethality in homozygous mice. Mol Cell Biol 2003;23:916–22.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    64. ↵
      1. Kaimul Ahsan M,
      2. Nakamura H,
      3. Tanito M<,
      4. et al.
      Thioredoxin-1 suppresses lung injury and apoptosis induced by diesel exhaust particles (DEP) by scavenging reactive oxygen species and by inhibiting DEP-induced downregulation of Akt. Free Radic Biol Med 2005;39:1549–59.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    65. ↵
      1. Barrios R,
      2. Shi ZZ,
      3. Kala SV<,
      4. et al.
      Oxygen-induced pulmonary injury in gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-deficient mice. Lung 2001;179:319–30.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    66. ↵
      1. Jean JC,
      2. Liu Y,
      3. Brown LA<,
      4. et al.
      Gamma-glutamyl transferase deficiency results in lung oxidant stress in normoxia. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2002;283:L766–76.
      OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    67. ↵
      1. Van Klaveren RJ,
      2. Dinsdale D,
      3. Pype JL<,
      4. et al.
      Changes in gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in rat lung tissue, BAL, and type II cells after hyperoxia. Am J Physiol 1997;273:L537–47.
      OpenUrlPubMed
    68. ↵
      1. Wang Y,
      2. Feinstein SI,
      3. Manevich Y<,
      4. et al.
      Lung injury and mortality with hyperoxia are increased in peroxiredoxin 6 gene-targeted mice. Free Radic Biol Med 2004;37:1736–43.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    69. ↵
      1. Wang Y,
      2. Phelan SA,
      3. Manevich Y<,
      4. et al.
      Transgenic mice overexpressing peroxiredoxin 6 show increased resistance to lung injury in hyperoxia. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;34:481–6.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
    70. ↵
      1. Gregoire G,
      2. Derderian F,
      3. Le Lorier J
      . Selecting the language of the publications included in a meta-analysis: is there a Tower of Babel bias? J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:159–63.
      OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science

    Supplementary materials

    Footnotes

    • Funding: Supported by USDA (CSREES) Subproject on grant number 2003-34324-13135 and by NIH R01 HL 0701022; ARB supported in part by NIH training grant T32 DK007158-31.

    • Competing interests: None.