Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Biases in the observational study of β blockers in COPD
Free
  1. S Suissa,
  2. P Ernst
  1. Center for Clinical Epidemiology and McGill Pharmacoepidemiology Research Unit, Jewish General Hospital, and Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC Canada
  1. Dr S Suissa, Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital, 3755 Côte-Sainte-Catherine Road, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3T 1E2; samy.suissa{at}mcgill.ca

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Dransfield and colleagues1 reported, using an observational study design, that inpatient use of β blockers by patients hospitalised for COPD is associated with a surprisingly important 61% reduction in mortality.1 They also reported an astonishing 92% reduction in mortality associated with short acting β agonist use. Several biases introduced in the design and analysis of this observational study must be considered when interpreting these startling mortality reductions in patients with COPD.

Firstly, immortal time bias was introduced by defining exposure to β blockers or to short acting β agonists by billings occurring at any time during the hospitalisation.2 Indeed, the exposed patients necessarily had some initial period with no exposure before they received these drugs during the course of their hospitalisation. This …

View Full Text

Linked Articles

  • Letters
    M T Dransfield S M Rowe J Johnson W Bailey L Gerald
  • Letters
    M T Dransfield S M Rowe J Johnson W Bailey L Gerald