Responses

Written action plans for asthma: an evidence-based review of the key components
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    What should patients do when asthma becomes less well controlled?
    • Graeme P Currie, Specialist Registrar in Respiratory Medicine
    • Other Contributors:
      • Daniel K C Lee

    Dear Editor

    The evidenced based-review by Gibson and Powell [1] highlights the benefit of written action plans when incorporated into the care of asthmatic patients. It is important to note that in most of their randomised controlled trials, patients were instructed to at least double the inhaled corticosteroid dose during deteriorating asthma control. A study in the Lancet has however provided little evidence tha...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.