Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Concerns of poor quality of life should not deprive patients of the opportunity of curative surgery
  1. K McManus
  1. Consultant Thoracic Surgeon, Royal Group of Hospitals, Belfast BT12 6AB, UK; mactheknife@utvinternet.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Is it worth undergoing lung cancer resection and the resulting poor quality of life when the survival outcomes are not good?

Postoperative pain and breathlessness following lung cancer surgery are important causes of disability. The prospect of such symptoms may influence the decision to proceed with surgery. Incapacitating intercostal neuralgia, unlike other surgical pain, often does not go away. Intolerable breathlessness caused by removing lung tissue from a patient who already has poor lung function can result in severe limitation of exercise tolerance. Is it really worth it when the survival outcomes in lung cancer are so poor anyway?

A surgeon’s main interest is radical clearance of the tumour and long term survival of the patient. Success is judged in terms of operative mortality and 5 year survival. The referring physician, on the other hand, may perceive that the patient will be left physically and emotionally handicapped by surgery and refer him or her for chemotherapy or radiotherapy instead, even though there is little evidence that these treatments are less debilitating and cure rates are known to be lower. What price …

View Full Text

Linked Articles

  • Airwaves
    Wisia Wedzicha