Responses

Download PDFPDF

Antibiotic resistant tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: 1993–1999
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests

PLEASE NOTE:

  • Responses are moderated before posting and publication is at the absolute discretion of BMJ, however they are not peer-reviewed
  • Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. Removal or editing of responses is at BMJ's absolute discretion
  • If patients could recognise themselves, or anyone else could recognise a patient from your description, please obtain the patient's written consent to publication and send them to the editorial office before submitting your response [Patient consent forms]
  • By submitting this response you are agreeing to our full [Response terms and requirements]

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    DOT for all patients with smear-positive pulmonary TB in London?
    • RD Barker, Consultant Physician
    • Other Contributors:
      • J Glyn-Jones, GH Bothamley

    Dear Editor

    Supervised drug-taking is frequently seen as the answer to rising levels of tuberculosis. Djuretic et al. advocate directly observed therapy (DOT) for all patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis in London.[1] At first sight, the experience of instituting DOT in New York City appears especially impressive, with a 21 % reduction in case rates 2 and 39 % decrease in drug-resistant isolates....

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.