Download PDFPDF

Interpretation of occupational peak flow records: level of agreement between expert clinicians and Oasys-2
Compose Response

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g.
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Statement of Competing Interests


  • A rapid response is a moderated but not peer reviewed online response to a published article in a BMJ journal; it will not receive a DOI and will not be indexed unless it is also republished as a Letter, Correspondence or as other content. Find out more about rapid responses.
  • We intend to post all responses which are approved by the Editor, within 14 days (BMJ Journals) or 24 hours (The BMJ), however timeframes cannot be guaranteed. Responses must comply with our requirements and should contribute substantially to the topic, but it is at our absolute discretion whether we publish a response, and we reserve the right to edit or remove responses before and after publication and also republish some or all in other BMJ publications, including third party local editions in other countries and languages
  • Our requirements are stated in our rapid response terms and conditions and must be read. These include ensuring that: i) you do not include any illustrative content including tables and graphs, ii) you do not include any information that includes specifics about any patients,iii) you do not include any original data, unless it has already been published in a peer reviewed journal and you have included a reference, iv) your response is lawful, not defamatory, original and accurate, v) you declare any competing interests, vi) you understand that your name and other personal details set out in our rapid response terms and conditions will be published with any responses we publish and vii) you understand that once a response is published, we may continue to publish your response and/or edit or remove it in the future.
  • By submitting this rapid response you are agreeing to our terms and conditions for rapid responses and understand that your personal data will be processed in accordance with those terms and our privacy notice.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

Other responses

Jump to comment:

  • Published on:
    Response to David Fishwick
    • P Sherwood Burge, Chest Physician
    • Other Contributors:
      • David baldwin, R.D.Barker, Charles Pantin

    Dear Editor

    Experts were given no clinical details except for times of waking and sleeping, and times of starting and leaving work. They were asked to make judgements based on the peak expiratory flow record alone, similar to the judgements made by the Oasys program. Oasys-2 has been shown to have a sensitivity of around 70%, when tested against independent objective diagnoses (mostly specific bronchial provocation t...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.
  • Published on:
    Man versus machine
    • David Fishwick, Respiratory Physician
    • Other Contributors:
      • Lisa M Bradshaw, Paul A Tate and Andrew D Curran

    Dear Editor

    We read with interest the article by Baldwin et al.[1] relating to the level of agreement between expert clinicians and OASYS software when making a diagnosis of occupational asthma. Our clinical unit uses OASYS plotting regularly, and find this of great use as one element of the diagnostic toolkit available for the confirmation of a diagnosis of occupational asthma.

    We were interested...

    Show More
    Conflict of Interest:
    None declared.