You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 55, Issue 10
  • Comparison of high dose inhaled steroids, low dose inhaled steroids plus low dose theophylline, and low dose inhaled steroids alone in chronic asthma in general practice

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Original article
Comparison of high dose inhaled steroids, low dose inhaled steroids plus low dose theophylline, and low dose inhaled steroids alone in chronic asthma in general practice
Free

Authors

  • Sam Lim aNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine and Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK, bNapp Laboratories Ltd, Cambridge, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Anon Jatakanon aNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine and Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK, bNapp Laboratories Ltd, Cambridge, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • David Gordon aNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine and Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK, bNapp Laboratories Ltd, Cambridge, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Christopher Macdonald aNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine and Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK, bNapp Laboratories Ltd, Cambridge, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Kian Fan Chung aNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine and Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK, bNapp Laboratories Ltd, Cambridge, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Peter J Barnes aNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine and Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6LY, UK, bNapp Laboratories Ltd, Cambridge, UK PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Professor K F Chung email: f.chung{at}ic.ac.uk
View Full Text

Citation

Lim S, Jatakanon A, Gordon D, et al
Comparison of high dose inhaled steroids, low dose inhaled steroids plus low dose theophylline, and low dose inhaled steroids alone in chronic asthma in general practice
Thorax 2000;55:837-841.

Publication history

  • Received November 3, 1999
  • Revision requested January 20, 2000
  • Revised June 23, 2000
  • Accepted July 12, 2000
  • First published October 1, 2000.
Online issue publication 
September 01, 2022

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

British Thoracic Society