<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com">
<title>Thorax recent issues</title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com</link>
<description>Thorax RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Thorax</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0040-6376</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/i?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/377?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/382?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/385?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/392?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/399?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/406?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/407?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/412?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/418?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/426?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/433?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/442?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/450?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/456?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/464-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/464-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/465?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/468?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://thorax.bmj.com/site/homepage/Thorax_95x60.gif" />
</channel>
<image rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/site/homepage/Thorax_95x60.gif">
<title>Thorax</title>
<url>http://thorax.bmj.com/site/homepage/Thorax_95x60.gif</url>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com</link>
</image>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/i?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Highlights from this issue]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/i?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec><st>USA today</st> <p>This issue coincides with the American Thoracic Society meeting, and we have tried to have a USA theme, showcasing work from North America to emphasise our wish to attract the best manuscripts from all round the world. These include a variety of topics: primary ciliary dyskinesia (with an attempt to recreate the cordial Anglo-American relationships extant at the time of the Boston Tea party in the correspondence columns!), COPD, interstitial lung disease and the basic science of lung development, reflecting the diversity of the Journal and the readership.</p> </sec> <sec><st>Actions not words</st> <p>In days of yore, the MRC led the world in randomised controlled trials, not least in establishing the evidence base for the treatment of tuberculosis. Times change and increasing energy is devoted to process not outcome, and frenetic reforms of everything possible and impossible by those who make headless chickens seem like Einstein. While we...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bush, A., Pavord, I.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202004</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2012-202004</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Highlights from this issue]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Airwaves</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>i</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>i</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/377?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Genotyping in primary ciliary dyskinesia: ready for prime time, or a fringe benefit?]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/377?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Once upon a time, many diagnoses were easy&mdash;for example, if you had a high sweat chloride, you had cystic fibrosis (CF); if the sweat electrolytes were normal, you did not. Now, recent advances in molecular genetics and airway electrophysiology have pushed back and blurred the diagnosis of CF, such that what was once straightforward can in atypical cases become the source of endless debate. The same has become true in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). The situation in PCD is even more complicated; diagnosis seldom relied on a single test, but has become confusing because of the large number of tests currently available, many of which are very sophisticated and only available in a small number of centres. So, what is a PCD diagnosis in the 21st century?</p> <p>First, of course, is it necessary to make a specific diagnosis of PCD at all? There are several reasons why it is;...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hogg, C., Bush, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201320</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-201320</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Genotyping in primary ciliary dyskinesia: ready for prime time, or a fringe benefit?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>377</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>378</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/379?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Should we be pursuing the earlier diagnosis of lung cancer in symptomatic patients?]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/379?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>Three papers published in this issue of <I>Thorax</I> address the issue of the late diagnosis of lung cancer.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1&ndash;3</cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2"></cross-ref><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3"></cross-ref> The most recent international population-based survival data for lung cancer again show the UK at the bottom of the scale with a predicted 8.8% of those diagnosed between 2005 and 2007 being alive at 5&nbsp;years compared with 14.4% in Norway, 16.3% in Sweden and 15&ndash;20% in areas of Australia and Canada.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b4">4</cross-ref> It has been estimated that, in England, around 1300 lives per year would be saved if our survival matched the best in Europe.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b5">5</cross-ref> It is well known that late diagnosis is the major reason why lung cancer outcomes are generally so poor and this is illustrated by the fact that, in the UK, more than 70% of patients have advanced stage (IIIB or IV) disease at the time of diagnosis.<cross-ref...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peake, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201449</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-201449</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Should we be pursuing the earlier diagnosis of lung cancer in symptomatic patients?]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>379</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>380</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Airway disease and emphysema on CT: not just phenotypes of lung pathology]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>In this issue of the journal, Martinez <I>et al</I><cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> examined the relationships between quantitative CT (QCT) parameters of emphysema, airway wall remodelling and airway narrowing and composite clinical and physiological indices of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the BODE index<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b3">3</cross-ref> BODE stands for Body mass index (BMI), airflow Obstruction, Dyspnoea and Exercise capacity.</p> <p>Not surprisingly, these QCT estimates of pathological changes were related to measures of clinical impact. More interestingly, the authors found that there were differences in the strength of the associations between measures of emphysema and airway disease and the composite indices. Measures of emphysema were more closely related with the BODE index while the airway wall abnormalities were better predictors of the SGRQ.</p> <p>While it has long been recognised that there is a spectrum of changes in the airways and parenchyma in COPD,<cross-ref...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pare, P. D., Camp, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201769</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2012-201769</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Airway disease and emphysema on CT: not just phenotypes of lung pathology]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>382</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/382?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Hot off the breath: 'I've a cost for'--the 64 million dollar question]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/382?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>On 12 January 2012, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed Ivacaftor for use in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged 6&nbsp;years and over, who carry at least one copy of the class 111 mutation G551D. The cost per patient year in the USA will be a staggering US$294 000. Given that patients with G551D account for around 5% of the total CF population, and assuming that the price will be similar in the UK, if these patients are to receive this medication, there will be a hole in someone's budget to the extent of &pound;60 million, because the one absolute certainty is that the government will not be making any more money available to cover the costs of this medication. To give context&mdash;the total national budget for CF care is of the order of &pound;110 million. This is certainly a &lsquo;wow-factor&rsquo; price; is it a wow-factor medication? What...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bush, A., Simmonds, N. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201798</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2012-201798</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Hot off the breath: 'I've a cost for'--the 64 million dollar question]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>382</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>384</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/385?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A genome-wide analysis of open chromatin in human tracheal epithelial cells reveals novel candidate regulatory elements for lung function]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/385?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Distal cell-type-specific regulatory elements may be located at very large distances from the genes that they control and are often hidden within intergenic regions or in introns of other genes. The development of methods that enable mapping of regions of open chromatin genome wide has greatly advanced the identification and characterisation of these elements.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Here we use DNase I hypersensitivity mapping followed by deep sequencing (DNase-seq) to generate a map of open chromatin in primary human tracheal epithelial (HTE) cells and use bioinformatic approaches to characterise the distribution of these sites within the genome and with respect to gene promoters, intronic and intergenic regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Genes with HTE-selective open chromatin at their promoters were associated with multiple pathways of epithelial function and differentiation. The data predict novel cell-type-specific regulatory elements for genes involved in HTE cell function, such as structural proteins and ion channels, and the transcription factors that may interact with them to control gene expression. Moreover, the map of open chromatin can identify the location of potentially critical regulatory elements in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in which the strongest association is with single nucleotide polymorphisms in non-coding regions of the genome. We demonstrate its relevance to a recent GWAS that identifies modifiers of cystic fibrosis lung disease severity.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Since HTE cells have many functional similarities with bronchial epithelial cells and other differentiated cells in the respiratory epithelium, these data are of direct relevance to elucidating the molecular basis of normal lung function and lung disease.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bischof, J. M., Ott, C. J., Leir, S.-H., Gosalia, N., Song, L., London, D., Furey, T. S., Cotton, C. U., Crawford, G. E., Harris, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200880</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-200880</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular genetics, Airway biology, Cystic fibrosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A genome-wide analysis of open chromatin in human tracheal epithelial cells reveals novel candidate regulatory elements for lung function]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Airway biology</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>385</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/391?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Azithromycin 250 mg daily reduces exacerbation frequency and improves quality of life in selected COPD patients]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/391?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>This multicentre study randomised 1142 subjects at risk of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to receive azithromycin 250&nbsp;mg daily (n=570) or placebo (n=572) for 1&nbsp;year, in addition to usual care. The enrolled subjects were allowed to continue on inhaled treatments and/or oxygen. None of the subjects were on oral theophylline. The primary outcome, time to the first exacerbation, was significantly increased to 266&nbsp;days (95% CI 227 to 313) in the azithromycin group compared with 174&nbsp;days (95% CI 143 to 215) in the placebo group. The HR for having an acute exacerbation of COPD per patient-year was 0.73 in the azithromycin group compared with the placebo group. The secondary outcomes included quality of life measures (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores), which improved more in the azithromycin compared with the placebo group. There was no significant reduction in hospitalisation rates and emergency department or urgent care visits...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pannu, K. D. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201189</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-201189</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Azithromycin 250 mg daily reduces exacerbation frequency and improves quality of life in selected COPD patients]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Miscellaneous</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>391</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>391</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/392?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Glucocorticoid receptor {beta} and histone deacetylase 1 and 2 expression in the airways of severe asthma]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/392?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Rationale</st>
<p>Upregulation of glucocorticoid receptor &beta; (GR&beta;) has been implicated in steroid resistance in severe asthma, although previous studies are conflicting. GR&beta; has been proposed as a dominant negative isoform of glucocorticoid receptor &alpha; (GR&alpha;) but it has also been suggested that GR&beta; can cause steroid resistance via reduced expression of histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2), a key regulator of steroid responsiveness in the airway.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To examine GR&beta;, GR&alpha;, HDAC1 and HDAC2 expression at transcript and protein levels in bronchial biopsies from a large series of patients with severe asthma, and to compare the findings with those of patients with mild to moderate asthma and healthy volunteers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Bronchoscopic study in two UK centres with real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry performed on biopsies, western blotting of bronchial epithelial cells and immunoprecipitation with anti-GR&beta; antibody.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Measurements and main results</st>
<p>Protein and mRNA expression for GR&alpha; and HDAC2 did not differ between groups. GR&beta; mRNA was detected in only 13 of 73 samples (seven patients with severe asthma), however immunohistochemistry showed widespread epithelial staining in all groups. Western blotting of bronchial epithelial cells with GR&beta; antibody detected an additional &lsquo;cross-reacting&rsquo; protein, identified as clathrin. HDAC1 expression was increased in patients with severe asthma compared with healthy volunteers.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>GR&beta; mRNA is expressed at low levels in a minority of patients with severe asthma. HDAC1 and HDAC2 expression was not downregulated in severe asthma. These data do not support upregulated GR&beta; and resultant reduced HDAC expression as the principal mechanism of steroid resistance in severe asthma. Conflicting GR&beta; literature may be explained in part by clathrin cross-reactivity with commercial antibodies.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Butler, C. A., McQuaid, S., Taggart, C. C., Weldon, S., Carter, R., Skibinski, G., Warke, T. J., Choy, D. F., McGarvey, L. P., Bradding, P., Arron, J. R., Heaney, L. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200760</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-200760</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Asthma, Cardiothoracic surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Glucocorticoid receptor {beta} and histone deacetylase 1 and 2 expression in the airways of severe asthma]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Asthma</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>392</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>398</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/399?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relationship between quantitative CT metrics and health status and BODE in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/399?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>The value of quantitative CT (QCT) to identify chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotypes is increasingly appreciated. The authors hypothesised that QCT-defined emphysema and airway abnormalities relate to St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and Body-Mass Index, Airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea and Exercise Capacity Index (BODE).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>1200 COPDGene subjects meeting Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria for COPD with QCT analysis were included. Total lung emphysema was measured using the density mask technique with a &ndash;950 Hounsfield unit threshold. An automated programme measured mean wall thickness (WT), wall area percentage (WA%) and 10&nbsp;mm lumenal perimeter (pi10) in six segmental bronchi. Separate multivariate analyses examined the relative influence of airway measures and emphysema on SGRQ and BODE.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>In separate models predicting SGRQ score, a 1 unit SD increase in each airway measure predicted higher SGRQ scores (for WT, 1.90 points higher, p=0.002; for WA%, 1.52 points higher, p=0.02; for pi10, 2.83 points higher p&lt;0.001). The comparable increase in SGRQ for a 1 unit SD increase in emphysema percentage in these models was relatively weaker, significant only in the pi10 model (for emphysema percentage, 1.45 points higher, p=0.01). In separate models predicting BODE, a 1 unit SD increase in each airway measure predicted higher BODE scores (for WT, 1.07-fold increase, p&lt;0.001; for WA%, 1.20-fold increase, p&lt;0.001; for pi10, 1.16-fold increase, p&lt;0.001). In these models, emphysema more strongly influenced BODE (range 1.24&ndash;1.26-fold increase, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Emphysema and airway disease both relate to clinically important parameters. The relative influence of airway disease is greater for SGRQ; the relative influence of emphysema is greater for BODE.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martinez, C. H., Chen, Y.-H., Westgate, P. M., Liu, L. X., Murray, S., Curtis, J. L., Make, B. J., Kazerooni, E. A., Lynch, D. A., Marchetti, N., Washko, G. R., Martinez, F. J., Han, M. K., COPDGene Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201185</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-201185</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Pulmonary emphysema]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relationship between quantitative CT metrics and health status and BODE in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>399</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>406</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/406?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Service targeting hard to reach tuberculosis patients in London is cost effective]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/406?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p>The incidence of tuberculosis in the UK is increasing, particularly in hard-to-reach groups such as problematic drug users and homeless individuals. A &lsquo;Find and Treat&rsquo; service, which provides mobile radiography and case management support, has been operating in London since 2007. This study assessed the cost effectiveness of the Find and Treat service for diagnosing and managing hard to reach patients with tuberculosis.</p> <p>Patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis screened or managed by the Find and Treat service between 2007 and 2010 (48 identified by mobile screening, 188 referred for case management support and 180 referred as lost to previous follow-up) were matched with 252 control patients who presented via London's enhanced tuberculosis surveillance system. A model was constructed based on various parameters such as the likelihood of completing treatment and quality of life with untreated and treated tuberculosis. The Find and Treat service was estimated to gain 220 quality-adjusted...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eccles, S. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201188</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-201188</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Service targeting hard to reach tuberculosis patients in London is cost effective]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Miscellaneous</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>406</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>406</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/407?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Relative versus absolute change in forced vital capacity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/407?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over time reliably predicts mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The use of this measure in clinical practice is recommended by current evidence-based guidelines. It is unknown if the method of calculating decline in FVC (relative vs absolute change) impacts its frequency or its ability to predict mortality.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis from two prospective cohorts were included if they had a baseline and 12-month follow-up FVC. A &ge;10% decline in FVC from baseline was calculated in two ways: a relative decline of 10% (eg, from 60% predicted to 54% predicted) and an absolute decline of 10% (eg, from 60% predicted to 50% predicted). The frequency of a &ge;10% decline in FVC and its ability to predict 2-year transplant-free survival were compared between these two methods. Declines in FVC of &ge;5% and &ge;15% were similarly compared. Analyses were performed unadjusted and adjusted for age, gender, use of oxygen, baseline FVC and baseline diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>The frequency of any given FVC decline was significantly greater using the relative change in FVC method. For &ge;10% decline, both methods predicted 2-year transplant-free survival with similar accuracy, and remained significant predictors after adjusting for baseline characteristics. The absolute change method appeared more predictive for &ge;5% decline.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Using the relative change in FVC maximises the chance of identifying a &ge;10% decline in FVC without sacrificing prognostic accuracy. This may not hold true for &ge;5% decline in FVC. These findings have important implications for clinical practice and the design of clinical trials.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richeldi, L., Ryerson, C. J., Lee, J. S., Wolters, P. J., Koth, L. L., Ley, B., Elicker, B. M., Jones, K. D., King, T. E., Ryu, J. H., Collard, H. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201184</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-201184</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Airway biology, Interstitial lung disease, Lung function]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Relative versus absolute change in forced vital capacity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Interstitial lung disease</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>407</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>411</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/412?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Early diagnosis of lung cancer: evaluation of a community-based social marketing intervention]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/412?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Poor UK lung cancer survival rates may, in part, be due to late diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To evaluate the effectiveness of a mixed-method community-based social marketing intervention on lung cancer diagnoses.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>A public awareness campaign in conjunction with brief intervention training in general practices was piloted in six localities with a high lung cancer incidence. End points were self-reported awareness of lung cancer symptoms; intention to seek healthcare; chest x-ray referral rates in primary care; secular trends in the incidence of lung cancer and stage at diagnosis, compared before and after the intervention.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>21% (128/600) (95% CI 18% to 25%) of the targeted population recalled something about the campaign. Compared with a responder in the control area, the odds of a responder in the intervention area saying that they would visit their general practitioner and request a chest x-ray for a cough was 1.97 times (95% CI 1.18 to 3.31, p=0.01). Primary care chest x-ray referral rates increased by 20% in the targeted practices in the year following the intervention compared with a 2% fall in the control practices. The difference was highly significant, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.22 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.33, p=0.001). There was a 27% increase in lung cancer diagnoses in the intervention area compared with a fall in the control area. The incidence rate ratio was 1.42 (95% CI 0.83 to 2.44 p=0.199).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>This is encouraging early evidence that an awareness and early recognition initiative may facilitate lung cancer diagnosis.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Athey, V. L., Suckling, R. J., Tod, A. M., Walters, S. J., Rogers, T. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:13-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200714</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-200714</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung neoplasms, Editor's choice, General practice / family medicine, Lung cancer (oncology), Screening (oncology), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), Radiology (diagnostics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Early diagnosis of lung cancer: evaluation of a community-based social marketing intervention]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Lung cancer</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>412</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>417</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/418?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/418?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Background</st>
<p>Earlier diagnosis of lung cancer is key to reducing mortality. New evidence suggests that smokers have negative attitudes to screening and participation in lung cancer screening trials is poor (&lt;1 in 6 of those eligible). Understanding participation is important since uptake in screening trials is likely to predict uptake in screening programmes. A qualitative study of people accepting and declining participation in the Lung-SEARCH screening trial was conducted. Two questions were addressed: Are the screening methods offered acceptable to patients? Why do some people take part and others decline?</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>The qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 60 respondents from three groups: (a) trial participants providing an annual sputum sample; (b) trial participants with a sputum sample showing abnormal cytology and thus undergoing annual CT scanning and bronchoscopy; and (c) those declining trial participation.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Most respondents (48/60, 80%) viewed sputum provision, CT scanning and bronchoscopy as largely acceptable. Those declining trial participation described fear of bronchoscopy, inconvenience of travelling to hospitals for screening investigations and perceived themselves as having low susceptibility to lung cancer or being too old to benefit. Patients declining participation discounted their risk from smoking and considered negative family histories and good health to be protective. Four typological behaviours emerged within those declining: &lsquo;too old to be bothered&rsquo;, &lsquo;worriers&rsquo;, &lsquo;fatalists&rsquo; and &lsquo;avoiders&rsquo;.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusion</st>
<p>Sputum provision, CT scanning and bronchoscopy are largely acceptable to those participating in a screening trial. However, the decision to participate or decline reflects a complex balance of factors including acceptability and convenience of screening methods, risk perception, altruism and self-interest. Improving practical and changing cognitive aspects of participation will be key to improving uptake of lung cancer screening.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patel, D., Akporobaro, A., Chinyanganya, N., Hackshaw, A., Seale, C., Spiro, S. G., Griffiths, C., on behalf of the Lung-SEARCH Investigators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200055</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-200055</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung neoplasms, Epidemiologic studies, Lung cancer (oncology), Screening (oncology), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), Cardiothoracic surgery, Radiology (diagnostics), Screening (epidemiology), Health education, Screening (public health), Smoking, Health effects of tobacco use, Tobacco use]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Attitudes to participation in a lung cancer screening trial: a qualitative study]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Lung cancer</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>418</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>425</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/426?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge of lung cancer symptoms and risk factors in the UK: development of a measure and results from a population-based survey]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/426?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To develop and validate a Lung Cancer Awareness Measure (Lung CAM) and explore the demographical and social predictors of lung cancer awareness in the general population.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods study 1</st>
<p>Symptoms and risk factors for lung cancer were identified from the medical literature and health professional expertise in an iterative process. Test&ndash;retest reliability, internal reliability, item analyses, construct validity and sensitivity to changes in awareness of the Lung CAM were assessed in three samples (total N=191).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results study 1</st>
<p>The Lung CAM demonstrated good internal (Cronbach's &alpha;=0.88) and test&ndash;retest reliability (r=0.81, p&lt;0.001). Validity was supported by lung cancer experts scoring higher than equally educated controls (t(106)=8.7, p&lt;0.001), and volunteers randomised to read lung cancer information scoring higher than those reading a control leaflet (t(81)=3.66, p&lt;0.001).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods study 2</st>
<p>A population-based sample of 1484 adults completed the Lung CAM in a face-to-face, computer-assisted interview.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results study 2</st>
<p>Symptom awareness was low (average recall of one symptom) and there was little awareness of risk factors other than smoking. Familiarity with cancer, and being from a higher socioeconomic group, were associated with greater awareness.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Using a valid and reliable tool for assessing awareness showed the UK population to have low awareness of lung cancer symptoms and risk factors. Interventions to increase lung cancer awareness are needed to improve early detection behaviour.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon, A. E., Juszczyk, D., Smyth, N., Power, E., Hiom, S., Peake, M. D., Wardle, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200898</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-200898</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung neoplasms, Epidemiologic studies, Lung cancer (oncology), Screening (oncology), Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), Health education, Smoking, Health effects of tobacco use, Tobacco use]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge of lung cancer symptoms and risk factors in the UK: development of a measure and results from a population-based survey]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Lung cancer</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>426</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>432</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/433?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Mutations of DNAH11 in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia with normal ciliary ultrastructure]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/433?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<sec><st>Rationale</st>
<p>Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is an autosomal recessive, genetically heterogeneous disorder characterised by oto-sino-pulmonary disease and situs abnormalities (Kartagener syndrome) due to abnormal structure and/or function of cilia. Most patients currently recognised to have PCD have ultrastructural defects of cilia; however, some patients have clinical manifestations of PCD and low levels of nasal nitric oxide, but normal ultrastructure, including a few patients with biallelic mutations in dynein axonemal heavy chain 11 (<I>DNAH11</I>).</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Objectives</st>
<p>To test further for mutant <I>DNAH11</I> as a cause of PCD, <I>DNAH11</I> was sequenced in patients with a PCD clinical phenotype, but no known genetic aetiology.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Methods</st>
<p>82 exons and intron/exon junctions in <I>DNAH11</I> were sequenced in 163 unrelated patients with a clinical phenotype of PCD, including those with normal ciliary ultrastructure (n=58), defects in outer and/or inner dynein arms (n=76), radial spoke/central pair defects (n=6), and 23 without definitive ultrastructural results, but who had situs inversus (n=17), or bronchiectasis and/or low nasal nitric oxide (n=6). Additionally, <I>DNAH11</I> was sequenced in 13 subjects with isolated situs abnormalities to see if mutant <I>DNAH11</I> could cause situs defects without respiratory disease.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Results</st>
<p>Of the 58 unrelated patients with PCD with normal ultrastructure, 13 (22%) had two (biallelic) mutations in <I>DNAH11</I>; and two patients without ultrastructural analysis had biallelic mutations. All mutations were novel and private. None of the patients with dynein arm or radial spoke/central pair defects, or isolated situs abnormalities, had mutations in <I>DNAH11</I>. Of the 35 identified mutant alleles, 24 (69%) were nonsense, insertion/deletion or loss-of-function splice-site mutations.</p>
</sec>
<sec><st>Conclusions</st>
<p>Mutations in <I>DNAH11</I> are a common cause of PCD in patients without ciliary ultrastructural defects; thus, genetic analysis can be used to ascertain the diagnosis of PCD in this challenging group of patients.</p>
</sec>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knowles, M. R., Leigh, M. W., Carson, J. L., Davis, S. D., Dell, S. D., Ferkol, T. W., Olivier, K. N., Sagel, S. D., Rosenfeld, M., Burns, K. A., Minnix, S. L., Armstrong, M. C., Lori, A., Hazucha, M. J., Loges, N. T., Olbrich, H., Becker-Heck, A., Schmidts, M., Werner, C., Omran, H., Zariwala, M. A., for the Genetic Disorders of Mucociliary Clearance Consortium]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200301</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-200301</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Molecular genetics, Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Mutations of DNAH11 in patients with primary ciliary dyskinesia with normal ciliary ultrastructure]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Respiratory research</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>433</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>441</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/442?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Metabolic surgery and obstructive sleep apnoea: the protective effects of bariatric procedures]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/442?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The global epidemic of obesity and the worldwide prevalence of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are both increasing. Epidemiological studies reveal an association between obesity, weight gain and OSA. Metabolic or bariatric operations provide sustained weight loss and resolve or improve the symptoms of OSA in the majority of morbidly obese individuals. These operations also modulate the metabolic profile to improve glycaemic control, to decrease cardiovascular risk and obesity-related mortality. The beneficial effects of metabolic operations on OSA include mechanical weight-dependent and metabolic weight-independent effects that are achieved through the BRAVE effects: (<b>B</b>ile flow alteration; <b>R</b>eduction of gastric size; <b>A</b>natomical gut rearrangement and altered flow of nutrients; <b>V</b>agal manipulation; and <b>E</b>nteric gut hormone modulation). These result in an improvement in insulin resistance, adipokines, cytokines and systemic inflammation. A literature analysis was performed with statistical pooling of available surgical and medical studies to determine whether the weighted mean decrease in body mass index and sleep apnoea severity (measured by the apnoea-hypopnoea index) are larger in metabolic surgical studies than in non-surgical weight loss studies (diet, exercise and medication). However, heterogeneity across available trials, poor follow-up measures and a deficiency in comparative studies between surgical and non-surgical therapy precludes definitive statements regarding the relative benefits of surgical therapy. Further research is required to quantify robustly the effects and mechanisms of sleep apnoea resolution by metabolic surgery, which may reveal novel non-surgical treatments or enhanced surgical strategies in the management of this multisystem sleep disorder.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ashrafian, H., le Roux, C. W., Rowland, S. P., Ali, M., Cummin, A. R., Darzi, A., Athanasiou, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thx.2010.151225</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thx.2010.151225</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Epidemiologic studies, Sleep disorders (neurology), Inflammation, Sleep disorders, Sleep disorders (respiratory medicine), Health education, Obesity (public health)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Metabolic surgery and obstructive sleep apnoea: the protective effects of bariatric procedures]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>442</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>449</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/450?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Key observations from the NHLBI Asthma Clinical Research Network]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/450?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN) recently completed its work after 20&nbsp;years of collaboration as a multicentre clinical trial network. When formed, its stated mission was to perform multiple controlled clinical trials for treating patients with asthma by dispassionately examining new and existing therapies, and to rapidly communicate its findings to the medical community. The ACRN conducted 15 major clinical trials. In addition, clinical data, manual of operations, protocols and template informed consents from all ACRN trials are available via NHLBI BioLINCC (<A HREF="https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/">https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/</A>). This network contributed major insights into the use of inhaled corticosteroids, short-acting and long-acting &szlig;-adrenergic agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and novel agents (tiotropium, colchicine and macrolide antibiotics). They also pioneered studies of the variability in drug response, predictors of treatment response and pharmacogenetics. This review highlights the major research observations from the ACRN that have impacted the current management of asthma.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Szefler, S. J., Chinchilli, V. M., Israel, E., Denlinger, L. C., Lemanske, R. F., Calhoun, W., Peters, S. P., for the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Asthma Clinical Research Network]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201876</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2012-201876</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drugs: infectious diseases, Asthma, Drugs: respiratory system, Ethics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Key observations from the NHLBI Asthma Clinical Research Network]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>450</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>455</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/456?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Significance of the microbiome in obstructive lung disease]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/456?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The composition of the lung microbiome contributes to both health and disease, including obstructive lung disease. Because it has been estimated that over 70% of the bacterial species on body surfaces cannot be cultured by currently available techniques, traditional culture techniques are no longer the gold standard for microbial investigation. Advanced techniques that identify bacterial sequences, including the 16S ribosomal RNA gene, have provided new insights into the depth and breadth of microbiota present both in the diseased and normal lung. In asthma, the composition of the microbiome of the lung and gut during early childhood development may play a key role in the development of asthma, while specific airway microbiota are associated with chronic asthma in adults. Early bacterial stimulation appears to reduce asthma susceptibility by helping the immune system develop lifelong tolerance to innocuous antigens. By contrast, perturbations in the microbiome from antibiotic use may increase the risk for asthma development. In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bacterial colonisation has been associated with a chronic bronchitic phenotype, increased risk of exacerbations, and accelerated loss of lung function. In cystic fibrosis, studies utilising culture-independent methods have identified associations between decreased bacterial community diversity and reduced lung function; colonisation with <I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I> has been associated with the presence of certain CFTR mutations. Genomic analysis of the lung microbiome is a young field, but has the potential to define the relationship between lung microbiome composition and disease course. Whether we can manipulate bacterial communities to improve clinical outcomes remains to be seen.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Han, M. K., Huang, Y. J., LiPuma, J. J., Boushey, H. A., Boucher, R. C., Cookson, W. O., Curtis, J. L., Erb-Downward, J., Lynch, S. V., Sethi, S., Toews, G. B., Young, V. B., Wolfgang, M. C., Huffnagle, G. B., Martinez, F. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201183</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-201183</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Drugs: infectious diseases, Child health, Asthma, Cystic fibrosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Significance of the microbiome in obstructive lung disease]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>456</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>463</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/464-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cutting edge genetic studies in primary ciliary dyskinesia]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/464-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We would describe our genetic studies in primary ciliary dyskinesia<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> as &lsquo;cutting edge&rsquo;, rather than &lsquo;beyond the fringe&rsquo;.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Indeed, we predict that in 5&nbsp;years genetic testing will be more readily available and used worldwide for diagnostic studies in primary ciliary dyskinesia than high speed ciliary waveform analysis. Would Drs Bush and Hogg like to make a wager?</p>
<p><fn><no>Competing interests</no><p>None.</p>
</fn></p>
<p><fn><no>Provenance and peer review</no><p>Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.</p>
</fn></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knowles, M. R., Leigh, M. W., Zariwala, M. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201609</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2012-201609</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cutting edge genetic studies in primary ciliary dyskinesia]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>464</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>464</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/464-b?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Authors' response]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/464-b?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We thank Dr Knowles and colleagues for their interest in our editorial.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> The single gene locus responsible for cystic fibrosis was discovered more than 20&nbsp;years ago, and the vast majority of patients with cystic fibrosis are still diagnosed on a functional measure, namely the sweat test. The issue for the diagnosis of Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is surely not what is available, but what is accurate. And in response to the proposed wager, we are always happy to take candy from babies!</p>
<p><fn><no>Contributors</no><p>AB and CH contributed equally to the manuscript.</p>
</fn></p>
<p><fn><no>Competing interests</no><p>None.</p>
</fn></p>
<p><fn><no>Provenance and peer review</no><p>Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.</p>
</fn></p>]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bush, A., Hogg, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-201620</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2012-201620</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Authors' response]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>PostScript</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>464</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>464</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/465?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Basic science for the chest physician: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the cystic fibrosis airway]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/465?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <p><I>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</I> is the most frequently encountered lung pathogen in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Following initial, often intermittent, episodes of infection, it becomes a permanently established component of the chronically infected lung in more than 80% of patients and confers an adverse prognosis. The predisposition of the CF airway to <I>P aeruginosa</I> is incompletely understood but our current concept of the sequence of events leading from initial acquisition of infection through to the chronic state with severe but often ineffective inflammation is becoming clearer.</p> <sec><st>Initial infection</st> <p>The defect in ion transport resulting from abnormal CF transmembrane conductance regulator protein leads to a dehydrated airway surface. Mucociliary clearance suffers and either shed bacterial components, such as flagella, or, more controversially, the bacteria themselves, trigger inflammatory responses via direct contact with cell surface glycoproteins. Increased expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines leads to neutrophil influx from the systemic circulation. Although at early...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, H. D., Davies, J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201498</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-201498</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung infection, Drugs: infectious diseases, TB and other respiratory infections, Child health, Inflammation, Cystic fibrosis, Cardiothoracic surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Basic science for the chest physician: Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the cystic fibrosis airway]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chest clinic</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>465</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>467</prism:endingPage>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/468?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pulmonary mass in a 19-year-old male]]></title>
<link>http://thorax.bmj.com/cgi/content/short/67/5/468?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[ <sec><st>Clinical presentation</st> <p>A 19-year-old student who had never smoked presented with a 6-month history of cough, wheeze, sputum production and generalised fatigue. His exercise tolerance was unaffected and he continued to play rugby competitively. He had a history of childhood asthma and received treatment with inhaled salbutamol with no effect. A chest x-ray revealed a round density at the base of the right lung. A CT chest was performed (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="fig1">figure 1</cross-ref>) and subsequently a <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTATATE (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid-d-Phe(1),Tyr(3)-octreotate) PET-CT (positron emission tomography-CT) was arranged, demonstrating that the mass had a maximum standardised uptake value of 6.6 (<cross-ref type="fig" refid="fig2">figure 2</cross-ref>). He was referred for a right lower lobectomy. Histological evaluation of the lobectomy specimen demonstrated bland spindle cell proliferation with a prominent inflammatory infiltrate. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for vimentin, smooth muscle actin and cytokeratin AE1/AE3, and negative for desmin, caldesmon, calponin, ALK1 and CD34.</p> </sec> <sec><st>Question</st> <p>What...]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Smith, L.-J. E., Lawrence, D. R., Kayani, I., Capitanio, A., Falzon, M., Janes, S. M., Navani, N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2012-04-17T17:46:14-07:00</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200732</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>hwp:master-id:thoraxjnl;thoraxjnl-2011-200732</dc:identifier>
<dc:publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</dc:publisher>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Lung neoplasms, Lung cancer (oncology), Respiratory cancer, Screening (oncology), Child health, Inflammation, Asthma, Lung cancer (respiratory medicine), Drugs: respiratory system, Cardiothoracic surgery, Radiology (diagnostics)]]></dc:subject>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pulmonary mass in a 19-year-old male]]></dc:title>
<prism:publicationDate>2012-05-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:section>Chest clinic</prism:section>
<prism:volume>67</prism:volume>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:startingPage>468</prism:startingPage>
<prism:endingPage>468</prism:endingPage>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>
