Article Text

Correspondence
Reasons for heterogeneous change in LCI in children with cystic fibrosis after antibiotic treatment
Free
  1. Sophie Yammine1,2,
  2. Anja Bigler1,
  3. Carmen Casaulta1,
  4. Florian Singer1,3,
  5. Philipp Latzin1,2
  1. 1Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University Children's Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  2. 2University Children's Hospital of Basel UKBB, Basel, Switzerland
  3. 3University Children's Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  1. Correspondence to Professor Philipp Latzin, University Children's Hospital UKBB, Spitalstrasse 33, Postfach, Basel 4031, Switzerland; philipp.latzin{at}ukbb.ch

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

With great interest we read the paper of Horsley et al.1 In their prospective observational study they showed significant improvement in indices of ventilation capacity (spirometry) and ventilation heterogeneity (multiple-breath washout (MBW)) after a course of intravenous antibiotics in subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF). There was considerable heterogeneity of lung clearance index (LCI) response as observed previously.2 Here we aim to disentangle underlying physiological mechanisms of this heterogeneous response.

We assessed changes of lung function parameters before and after 23 courses of intravenous antibiotics in 19 children with CF aged 5–18 years. Children performed arterial blood oxygen measurement, nitrogen MBW,3 ,4 body plethysmography and spirometry.

We observed a very heterogeneous change in LCI, with a mean decrease from 13.2 to 12.9, (p=0.41), and clear improvement in 7 of 23 subjects (>1 lung turnovers, see online supplementary figure S1). Spirometric indices improved significantly (see online supplementary table S1).

We found that change in LCI and moment ratio is best explained by change in functional residual capacity from MBW (FRCMBW) minus residual volume (RV) (figure 1, see online supplementary figure S2). To our knowledge there is currently no established expression for this parameter.

Figure 1

Association of lung clearance index (LCI) improvement and change in FRCMBW—RV. Improvement of LCI (Δ LCI before minus after treatment) and change of functional residual capacity from nitrogen multiple-breath washout (FRCMBW) minus residual volume (RV) from body plethysmography after 19 antibiotic courses in children with cystic fibrosis.

In multivariable regression analysis, change of FRCMBW—RV and ventilation homogeneity of conductive airways (Scond) explained 58% variability of delta LCI (R2, see online supplementary table S2). These results suggest that improvement of LCI after antibiotic treatment in this patient group can be explained by: less secretion and obstruction (better ventilation of conductive airways=lower Scond), better ventilated lung units (net increase of expired tracer gas=FRCMBW) and less hyperinflation (lower RV). Depending on the dominating effect and the resulting time constant of overall ventilated lung units,2 LCI will change accordingly in the individual, explaining heterogeneous results.

The picture for moment ratio change is comparable, but understandably more influenced by peripheral ventilation (Sacin) (see online supplementary table S3 and figure S2).

Change in abnormal LCI remains complex and is determined by several components contributing to overall ventilation heterogeneity, generated at different levels of the lung. We speculate that in severe CF lung disease airway collapse might hamper decrease of RV and consequently improvement of LCI. Thus, depending on the magnitude of reversibility of the single components, LCI seems to be a marker suited to monitor changes better 5 or less good in the course of CF lung disease.

References

View Abstract

Supplementary materials

  • Supplementary Data

    This web only file has been produced by the BMJ Publishing Group from an electronic file supplied by the author(s) and has not been edited for content.

    Files in this Data Supplement:

Footnotes

  • Contributors Conceived and designed the experiments: SY, CC, FS, PL. Performed the experiments: SY. Analysed the data: SY, AB, PL. Wrote the paper: SY, PL. Qualified as the guarantor of the paper, took responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from inception to published article: PL.

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Ethics approval Ethics Committee of the Canton of Bern, Switzerland.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles