Chest
Volume 99, Issue 2, February 1991, Pages 355-357
Journal home page for Chest

Clinical Investigations
Adenosine Deaminase in the Diagnosis of Tuberculous Pleural Effusions: A Report of 218 Patients and Review of the Literature

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.99.2.355Get rights and content

The activity of adenosine deaminase in the pleural fluid of 218 consecutive patients was studied. According to the etiology of exudative pleural effusions, the patients were divided into the following five groups: (1) tuberculosis; (2) lung cancer; (3) pneumonias; (4) miscellaneous; and (5) idiopathic. Patients with pleural tuberculosis presented significantly higher ADA activity than patients with nontuberculous pleural effusions (p<0.0001). The results indicated that in a population with a relatively high prevalence of tuberculosis, the analysis of ADA levels in pleural effusions constitutes a useful marker for the diagnosis which, in addition, can be made quickly and cheaply. Additionally, a comprehensive review of the literature on the role of ADA in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusions is presented.

Section snippets

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and eighteen patients with the diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion (protein content greater than 30 g/L) were admitted to our Institute in a period of four years. There were 154 men and 64 women with a total mean age of 52 years (SD, 22.6). All patients were subjected to a pleural fluid aspirated and pleural biopsies, with the exception of those having parapneumonic effusions who had a diagnosis based on a history consistent with pneumonia and appropriate response to a course of

RESULTS

Two or more ADA measurements were performed for each sample with a difference of less than 5 percent between them. The ADA levels obtained in the different studied groups are shown in Figure 1. The ADA mean for the total population was 67.5 IU/L (SD 56). Tuberculous effusions presented a mean of 123.25 IU/L (SD 39.4), whereas nontuberculous fluids showed a mean of 30.36 IU/L (SD 26.4) (p<0.0001; Student's t test). Using 70 IU/L as a cut-off value, the ADA test exhibited a sensitivity of 98

DISCUSSION

Pleural effusions are common in clinical practice and they often constitute difficult diagnostic problems.

In spite of careful evaulation, the etiology of the effusions cannot be established in about 20 percent of patients.1,17,18 Pleural fluid cultures to detect the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are positive in only 20 to 30 percent of patients with tuberculous pleurisy,17 and biopsy of the parietal pleura shows typical epithelioid granulomas in 50 to 80 percent of patients with this

Cited by (104)

  • Adenosine deaminase is a useful biomarker to diagnose pleural tuberculosis in low to medium prevalence settings

    2016, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Citation Excerpt :

    It is likely that this scenario could avoid unnecessary costs. ADA activity is known to be also increased in empyema (Banales et al., 1991; Chen et al., 2004; Porcel et al., 2010; Valdes et al., 1996; Zaric et al., 2008). Patients with empyema had clear distinct clinical features with presence of frank pus in the pleural cavity, and may be easily distinguished from pTB, so ADA test should not be used in this situation.

  • Differential diagnosis of tuberculous and malignant pleurisy using pleural fluid adenosine deaminase and interferon gamma in Taiwan

    2011, Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection
    Citation Excerpt :

    This discrepancy can be attributed, in part, to the use of different methods. With the most frequently reported colorimetric ADA assay, described by Giusti and Galanti,16 the reported cutoff value for ADA varies from 40 IU/L to 60 IU/L.5,27,29,30,32–34 Our cutoff value of 30 IU/L was lower than this range, although this may be because of the ethnicity of our study population. The cutoff values for IFN-γ vary from 60 pg/mL to 240 pg/mL, based on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.35–37

View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported in part by the Canadian International Development Agency.

View full text