Chest
Prognosis of Patients with AIDS Requiring Intensive Care
Section snippets
Setting
The Medical Service of the New York Veterans Administration Medical Center consists of 120 ward beds, 6 cardiac care unit beds, and 12 medical ICU beds. In January 1988, the Medical Center opened an additional 16-bed ward for care of patients with AIDS. Bed occupancy by patients with AIDS has steadily increased, accounting for 13.8, 14.0, and 17.7 percent of Medical Service patient-days in 1985, 1986, and 1987, respectively. In contrast, medical ICU bed occupancy by patients with AIDS has shown
RESULTS
For the control group without AIDS (n = 166), predicted and observed death rates were closely matched, resulting in an observed/predicted mortality ratio not significantly different from 1 (Table 1, Fig 1). The subgroup of patients without AIDS requiring mechanical ventilation (n = 25) also had similar observed and predicted mortality. The mean APACHE II score of survivors among the patients without AIDS was significantly less than that of nonsurvivors (Table 2).
In contrast, the AIDS patient
DISCUSSION
This study was designed to evaluate the APACHE II classification, a measure of severity of illness, when applied to patients with AIDS requiring intensive care. For control patients without AIDS, the death rate predicted from the APACHE II regression equation closely corresponded to observed mortality. Among 83 patients with AIDS, observed mortality significantly exceeded that predicted by APACHE II. This excess mortality was largely explained by the failure of APACHE II to accurately predict
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors wish to thank Dr. Norton Spritz for his critical review of the manuscript.
REFERENCES (8)
- et al.
Prognosis of noncardiac medical patients requiring mechanical ventilation in a Veterans Hospital
Am J Med
(1987) - et al.
An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers
Ann Intern Med
(1986) - et al.
APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system
Crit Care Med
(1985) - et al.
APACHE II outcome prediction of HIV-positive patients requiring admission to an intensive care unit [Abstract]
Chest
(1988)
Cited by (55)
Performance assessment of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in a referral respiratory intensive care unit in Iran
2012, Acta Anaesthesiologica TaiwanicaCitation Excerpt :The two most popular systems introduced to date are APACHE and SAPS, which are based on multiple logistic regression equations describing abnormalities of physiologic variables during the first 24 hours of ICU admission.3,6 These scores have been evaluated in a wide range of patient populations and in many specialty- and subspecialty-related ICUs.7–19 However, because studies performed in respiratory diseases setting are scarce and because the ICU of our hospital is solely dedicated to patients with respiratory problems (medical and surgical), evaluating the prediction power of these scores became the goal of this study.
Intensive care unit outcomes in elderly cancer patients
2003, Critical Care ClinicsPrognosis of HIV/positive patients admitted to the intensive care unit
2000, Medicina IntensivaClinical course prognostic factors and outcome prediction for HIV patients in the ICU: The PIP (Pulmonary complications, ICU support, and prognostic factors in hospitalized patients with HIV) study
2000, ChestCitation Excerpt :The APACHE III,32 simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II,33 and mortality probability models II34 are current, updated scoring systems designed to estimate the probability of in-hospital mortality for adult ICU patients. SAPS I9,10 and APACHE II2,28,35,36 prognostic systems were used to predict mortality in some of the published studies dealing with HIV-infected ICU patients. However, both SAPS I and APACHE II are unlikely to have accurate prediction, because they were developed at a time when ICUs had few patients with HIV infection.
Factors predicting survival for HIV-infected patients with respiratory failure
2000, Netherlands Journal of Medicine
Manuscript received June 20; revision accepted February 1.