Chest
Original ResearchPulmonary ProceduresUse of Indwelling Pleural Catheters for Cardiogenic Pleural Effusions
Section snippets
Study Design and Setting
We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients who underwent IPC insertion (PleurX; CareFusion Corporation) for a pleural effusion due to cardiac disease at The Ottawa Hospital. The investigational protocol was reviewed and approved by The Ottawa Hospital Research Ethics Board (protocol number 2011873-01H).
Participants
Data on patients who underwent IPC insertion were collected prospectively in the CARE (Chronic Ascites and Recurrent Effusion) clinic database since the program started in 2006. Patients
Results
There were 43 IPCs inserted in 38 patients, including two patients who had subsequent ipsilateral IPC insertion and three who had a subsequent contralateral IPC insertion. One additional patient was not included in this analysis because of subsequent pleurodesis. First-time IPCs were inserted during admission in 18 patients (47.4%) and during pleuroscopy in 12 patients (31.6%) (Table 1). Six patients had pleuroscopy as outpatients. Patients were elderly, with a mean age of 78.7 years (95% CI,
Discussion
The results illustrate that IPC insertion for cardiogenic benign pleural effusions is feasible. When performed in selected patients, it is safe and effective in relieving symptoms, with few subsequent procedures required. There was successful spontaneous pleurodesis in 29.0% of patients. Those who eventually had their IPC removed had better performance status and were less dyspneic at baseline, and their survival was much longer.
Few options are available for cardiogenic pleural effusion when
Acknowledgments
Author contributions: Dr Srour had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Dr Srour: contributed to the study concept and design; data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; drafting of the manuscript; and final approval of the version to be published.
Dr Potechin: contributed to the data acquisition, revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, and final approval of the version
References (14)
- et al.
Single-center experience with 250 tunnelled pleural catheter insertions for malignant pleural effusion
Chest
(2006) - et al.
Management of malignant pleural effusions using the Pleur(x) catheter
Ann Thorac Surg
(2008) Transudative effusions
Eur Respir J
(1997)- et al.
Case of cardiac effusion treated by pleuroscopic talc spray [in French]
Mars Med
(1967) - et al.
The use of pleurodesis for intractable pleural effusion due to congestive heart failure
Postgrad Med J
(1983) - et al.
Recurring pleural effusion in congestive heart failure treated by pleurodesis
J Ir Med Assoc
(1969) - et al.
Effect of an indwelling pleural catheter vs chest tube and talc pleurodesis for relieving dyspnea in patients with malignant pleural effusion: the TIME2 randomized controlled trial
JAMA
(2012)
Cited by (34)
Diagnosis and Treatment of Pleural Effusion. Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery. Update 2022
2023, Archivos de BronconeumologiaHepatic Hydrothorax and Congestive Heart Failure Induced Pleural Effusion
2021, Clinics in Chest MedicineCitation Excerpt :The median time to pleurodesis ranged from 66 to 150 days.74 Although most reported studies to date are single center, retrospective with potential selection bias, these results suggest that IPC use in refractory CHF-induced PEs may lead to reduced length of hospital stay and provide symptomatic palliation to patients who would otherwise undergo frequent thoracenteses (Table 2).46,47,51,72,75–77 Literature on chemical pleurodesis in CHF-induced PE is scant and often includes single-center retrospective studies with heterogeneous population of nonmalignant etiology.
Bilateral Asymmetrical Pleural Effusion Due to Congestive Heart Failure
2021, Pleural Diseases: Clinical Cases and Real-World DiscussionsA case of hemothorax secondary to intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy: Considerations for use of fibrinolytics in high-risk patients
2021, Respiratory Medicine Case ReportsCitation Excerpt :The PleurX catheter (CareFusion, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1997 for management of malignant pleural Effusion and further licensed in 2011 for nonmalignant pleural effusion, is being frequently used for the outpatient management of RPEs [4,5]. The average time for pleurodesis is reported to be 95 days, although the rate of pleurodesis can be variable [6]. Recent studies have evaluated the effectiveness of IPC instillation of tPA in restoring the flow of non draining IPC when the saline flush fails.
Indwelling Pleural Catheters for Nonmalignant Effusions: Evidence-Based Answers to Clinical Concerns
2017, American Journal of the Medical SciencesCitation Excerpt :Fourteen catheters were eventually removed because of spontaneous pleurodesis. Similar results were reported by Srour et al25 in 2013, with all 38 patients who received catheters experiencing significant relief of dyspnea and 11 patients experiencing spontaneous pleurodesis. In 2014, Freeman et al26 published a propensity-matched comparison of 40 patients with heart failure receiving TPCs with 40 similar patients undergoing thoracoscopic pleurodesis.
Management of Benign Pleural Effusions Using Indwelling Pleural Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
2017, ChestCitation Excerpt :From the available data, 37 catheters were removed secondary to complications. Complications that necessitated the removal of an indwelling catheter were loculation (three cases),8,27 pleural fluid leakage (one case),13 IPC dislodgement (one case),12 and, as described earlier, empyema (three cases). Detailed information was reported from only eight of 37 catheter removals secondary to complications, leaving 29 catheters that were removed because of unspecified complications.
Funding/Support: The authors have reported to CHEST that no funding was received for this study.
Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians. See online for more details.