Pneumologie 2012; 66(08): 470-475
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310103
Original Paper
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Burden of Pneumococcal Pneumonia – Experience of the German Competence Network CAPNETZ

Epidemiologie, Klinik und Verlauf der Pneumokokkenpneumonie – Daten aus CAPNETZ
M. W. Pletz*
1   Center for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
,
H. von Baum*
3   Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
M. van der Linden*
4   National Reference Center for Streptococci, Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital (RWTH), Aachen, Germany
,
G. Rohde*
5   Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre − MUMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
H. Schütte*
6   Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
,
N. Suttorp*
6   Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
,
T. Welte*
2   Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 15 June 2012

accepted after revision 27 June 2012

Publication Date:
08 August 2012 (online)

Abstract

Background: Pneumococcal pneumonia is still an important cause of mortality. The objective of this study was to compare frequency, clinical presentation, outcome and vaccination status of patients with pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to CAP due to other or no detected pathogen based on data of the German Network for community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ).

Methods: Demographic, clinical and diagnostic data were recorded using standardized web-based data acquisition. Standardized microbiological sampling and work-up were conducted in each patient.

Results: 7400 patients with CAP from twelve clinical centers throughout Germany were included. In 2259 patients (32 %) a pathogen was identified, Streptococcus pneumonia being the most frequent (n = 676, 30 % of all patients with identified pathogens). Compared to those with non-pneumococcal pneumonia, patients with pneumococcal pneumonia were more frequently admitted to hospital (80 % vs. 66 %, p < 0.001), had higher CURB score values on admission, had more frequently pleural effusion (19 % vs. 14 %, p = 0.001) and needed more frequently oxygen insufflation (58 % vs. 44 %, p < 0.001). There was no relevant difference in overall mortality.

Conclusions: Pneumococcal pneumonia was associated with a more severe clinical course demanding more medical resources as compared to non-pneumococcal pneumonia.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Trotz Verfügbarkeit wirksamer Antibiotika ist die Pneumokokkenpneumonie weiterhin mit einer relevanten Mortalität belastet. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wurden Häufigkeit, Symptomatik, Verlauf und Impfstatus von Patienten mit ambulant erworbener Pneumonie mit und ohne Nachweis von Pneumokokken verglichen.

Methoden: Demographische, klinische und diagnostische Daten wurden über ein internet-basiertes Formular erfasst. Bei jedem Patienten wurde eine standardisierte mikrobiologische Diagnostik durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse: 7400 Patienten mit ambulant erworbener Pneumonie wurden in 12 deutschen Studienzentren eingeschlossen. Bei 2259 Patienten (32 %) wurde ein Erreger identifiziert, dabei wurden Pneumokokken am häufigsten nachgewiesen (n = 676, 30 % aller Patienten mit Erregernachweis). Patienten mit Pneumokokkennachweis wurden häufiger hospitalisiert (80 % vs 66 %, p < 0.001), hatten einen höheren CURB-Punktwert bei Studieneinschluss, entwickelten häufiger einen Pleuraerguss (19 % vs 14 %, p = 0.001) und benötigten häufiger eine Sauerstoffinsufflation (58 % vs 44 %, p < 0.001). Es gab keinen signifikanten Unterschied in der Letalität.

Schlussfolgerung: Patienten mit Pneumokokkenpneumonien zeigten einen schwereren Verlauf und erforderten eine komplexere medizinische Versorgung als Patienten, bei denen keine Pneumokokken nachgewiesen wurden.

* for the CAPNETZ Study Group


 
  • References

  • 1 Trotter CL, Stuart JM, George R et al. Increasing hospital admissions for pneumonia, England. Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14: 727-733
  • 2 Welte T, Kohnlein T. Global and local epidemiology of community-acquired pneumonia: the experience of the CAPNETZ Network. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 30: 127-135
  • 3 Woodhead M. Community-acquired pneumonia in Europe: causative pathogens and resistance patterns. Eur Respir J Suppl 2002; 36: 20s-27s
  • 4 Marchese A, Esposito S, Coppo E et al. Detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae and identification of pneumococcal serotypes by real-time polymerase chain reaction using blood samples from Italian children ≤ 5 years of age with community-acquired pneumonia. Microb Drug Resist 2011; 17: 419-421
  • 5 Pletz MW, Welte T, Ott SR. Advances in the prevention, management, and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. F1000 Medicine Reports. [Review] 2010; 2 (53)
  • 6 Feikin DR, Schuchat A, Kolczak M et al. Mortality from invasive pneumococcal pneumonia in the era of antibiotic resistance, 1995 −1997. Am J Public Health 2000; 90: 223-229
  • 7 Austrian R, Gold J. Pneumococcal bacteremia with especial reference to bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Ann Intern Med 1964; 60: 759-776
  • 8 Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA et al. Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis. JAMA 1996; 275: 134-141
  • 9 Schweiger B, Zadow I, Heckler R et al. Application of a fluorogenic PCR assay for typing and subtyping of influenza viruses in respiratory samples. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 1552-1558
  • 10 Ewig S, Torres A. Community-acquired pneumonia as an emergency: time for an aggressive intervention to lower mortality. Eur Respir J 2011; 38: 253-260
  • 11 Welte T. Risk factors and severity scores in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: prediction of severity and mortality. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
  • 12 Polverino E, Dambrava P, Cilloniz C et al. Nursing home-acquired pneumonia: a 10 year single-centre experience. Thorax 2010; 65: 354-359
  • 13 Johnstone J, Eurich DT, Minhas JK et al. Impact of the pneumococcal vaccine on long-term morbidity and mortality of adults at high risk for pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51: 15-22
  • 14 Moberley SA, Holden J, Tatham DP et al. Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (01) CD000422
  • 15 Johnstone J. ACP Journal Club. Review: pneumococcal vaccination is not effective for preventing pneumonia, bacteremia, bronchitis, or mortality.. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 5-14
  • 16 Huss A, Scott P, Stuck AE et al. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2009; 180: 48-58
  • 17 Maruyama T, Taguchi O, Niederman MS et al. Efficacy of 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in preventing pneumonia and improving survival in nursing home residents: double blind, randomised and placebo controlled trial. BMJ 2010; 340: 1004
  • 18 von Baum H, Welte T, Marre R et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia revisited within the German Competence Network for Community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ). BMC Infect Dis 2009; 9: 62
  • 19 Ruiz-Gonzalez A, Falguera M, Nogues A et al. Is Streptococcus pneumoniae the leading cause of pneumonia of unknown etiology? A microbiologic study of lung aspirates in consecutive patients with community-acquired pneumonia.. Am J Med 1999; 106: 385-390
  • 20 Ishida T, Hashimoto T, Arita M et al. Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized patients: a 3-year prospective study in Japan. Chest 1998; 114: 1588-1593