Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB): Increasing diagnostic yield

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2012.02.002Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Summary

Objectives

To determine factors associated with diagnostic yield of ENB.

Methods

In 112 consecutive patients referred to our department between March 2010 and December 2010 the diagnostic work-up for solitary pulmonary lesions included a FDG-PET-CT scan, and ENB in combination with ROSE. The final diagnosis was confirmed by histopathological evaluation of specimen obtained either by ENB, or – if ENB was not diagnostic – by CT-guided fine needle aspiration or surgery.

Results

Thirty-seven (33%) subjects were female, mean age was 66.7 (±1.04) years. The mean diameter of lesions was 27 mm (range: 6–46 mm). In 83.9% the combination of PET-CT, ENB, and ROSE established a correct diagnosis, as defined by the definite histopathological result. 15.2% (17/112) of lesions were benign, and 84.8% (95/112) were malignant. For 112 procedures we observed a steep learning curve with a diagnostic yield of 80% and 87.5% for the first 30 and last 30 procedures, respectively. The diagnostic yield in lesions ≤20 mm and >20 mm in diameter was 75.6% and 89.6% (p = 0.06), respectively. No significant difference in diagnostic yield was seen depending on lung function, and the localization of the lesions. Two cases (1.8%) of pneumothorax were seen during and up to 24 h after bronchoscopy, none of them required a chest tube.

Conclusion

Diagnostic yield increased with experience but was independent from the size of the lesion, the localisation in the lungs, and lung function. The diagnostic yield of ENB can be as high as for CT-guided transthoracic biopsies but carries a significantly lower complication rate.

Keywords

Bronchoscopy
Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy
Peripheral lung lesion
Transbronchial biopsy

Abbreviations

ENB
Electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy
ROSE
Rapid on-site cytopathologic examination
PET/CT
Positron-emission computed tomography

Cited by (0)