Data for this review were identified through searches of the complete PubMed and Medline databases up to March 19, 2004, using several combinations of the search terms “tuberculosis”, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis”, “multi-drug resistance”, “tuberculin”, “directly observed therapy”, and “HIV-1”, and references from the relevant articles retrieved. Only human studies were selected. Additionally, websites from organisations including the WHO, National Institutes of Health USA, US Centers for
ReviewTuberculosis in New York city: recent lessons and a look ahead
Section snippets
Public health and social disarray
In 1968, the incidence of tuberculosis had so declined in New York city that a mayoral task force was created with the goals of eradicating tuberculosis from the city. The plan the group devised called for the elimination of most tuberculosis beds in New York city, earlier hospital discharge of patients with tuberculosis, and the implementation of community-based drug-treatment programmes.10 Amid the fiscal crisis of the decade, resources for the intended outpatient-care facilities never
DOT and broader therapeutic regimens
By 1992, it was recognised that tuberculosis had reached epidemic proportions in New York city. Initial responses targeted the abysmal rates of treatment compliance and chemotherapeutic drug regimens. The New York City Bureau of Tuberculosis Control and New York city passed regulations compelling an individual to complete treatment, to receive treatment under DOT, or to be detained for treatment. By the end of 1994 more than 1200 people were enrolled in the newly expanded DOT programme in New
Future issues
The epidemic in New York city left countless individuals exposed to and latently infected with M tuberculosis, including strains of MDRTB. In fact, a highly resistant strain of M tuberculosis, strain W, has disseminated widely in New York city and continues to cause disease.53 As these individuals age, the chance of a reactivation of their disease becomes more probable since a substantial number of individuals have never received appropriate prophylaxis for their infection.6 Further increasing
Search strategy and selection criteria
References (64)
Discriminatory public policies and the New York City tuberculosis epidemic, 1975–1993
Microbes Infect
(2001)- et al.
Effect of highly active antiretroviral therapy on incidence of tuberculosis in South Africa: a cohort study
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Effect of isoniazid prophylaxis on incidence of active tuberculosis and progression of HIV infection
Lancet
(1993) - et al.
The molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in New York City: the importance of nosocomial transmission and laboratory error
Tuber Lung Dis
(1996) - et al.
Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and AIDS
Lancet
(1994) - et al.
Dramatic decrease in tuberculin skin test conversion rate among employees at a hospital in New York City
Am J Infect Control
(1995) - et al.
Anti-tumour necrosis factor agents and tuberculosis risk: mechanisms of action and clinical management
Lancet Infect Dis
(2003) - et al.
Tuberculosis
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Tuberculosis control: past 10 years and future progress
Tuberculosis (Edinb)
(2003) Tuberculosis in New York City, 2002: Information Summary
(Nov. 2003)