Elsevier

Lung Cancer

Volume 32, Issue 2, May 2001, Pages 137-144
Lung Cancer

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of squamous cell carcinoma antigen in non-small cell lung cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(00)00225-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) is a glycoprotein secreted by non-small cell lung tumours (NSCLC). This study investigated the diagnostic and prognostic significance of SCC-Ag in NSCLC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to test the diagnostic performance of the SCC-Ag and determine the optimal threshold value in a group of 100 NSCLC patients undergoing surgery and 50 age matched healthy controls. This threshold was then prospectively validated in a group of 53 patients and 49 healthy controls. The prognostic significance of the preoperative SCC-Ag level and its postoperative decrease were tested using univariate and multivariate proportional hazard models. The area under the ROC curve was 0.71±0.04, and the best cutoff value was 1.4 ng/ml. This discriminated patients in the validation group, with a sensitivity of 0.55 and a specificity of 1.0. The hazard ratio was 0.144 (95% CI 0.074–0.281) for the postoperative decrease in the SCC Ag, and 5.823 (3.299–10.278) for the preoperative SCC Ag level. Multivariate analysis revealed that only disease stage and patients’ age are strong prognostic factors for survival. In conclusion, the SCC-Ag serum level has moderate diagnostic role in NSCLC. Both the preoperative SCC-Ag level and its postoperative decrease have prognostic significance, yet inferior to the disease stage and the patient's age.

Introduction

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) antigen, a subfraction of the TA-4 antigen, is a glycoprotein secreted by various tumours, including those of the lung [8]. Studies conducted to investigate the usefulness of the SCC antigen in the diagnosis and prognosis of lung cancer, have produced contradictory results [1], [2], [3], [5], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Most of these studies have used arbitrarily defined cut-off values of the SCC antigen serum level to discriminate lung cancer patients from control subjects, which might have adversely affected the performance of this tumour marker. Furthermore, the results obtained from these studies were not prospectively validated [6].

To circumvent this problem we have used receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to test the diagnostic performance of the SCC antigen and determine the optimal threshold value in a group of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing curative surgery and age matched controls (derivation group). This threshold value was afterwards prospectively validated in another group of NSCLC patients and controls (validation group) [6].

The prognostic significance of preoperative SCC antigen level in lung cancer patients is rather limited [2], [10]. Nevertheless, the SCC antigen level decreases after surgery. The prognostic significance of this decrease in SCC antigen level after surgery has not been adequately tested. We, therefore, also studied the prognostic significance of the decrease in SCC antigen level after surgery, and compared it with other predictors of survival of NSCLC patients.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

We have measured SCC antigen in the serum of 153 patients with primary NSCLC (149 males, 62±10 years old), before and 1 month after surgery, and in 99 age matched healthy controls (97 males), using a commercially available ELISA kit (Abbot Laboratories, USA). Patients (77) had SCC, 45 had adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 31 patients had large cell carcinoma (LCC). The inclusion period was from May 1994 to August 1996.

Patients had been considered as candidates for surgery based on clinical and

Results

The preoperative serum SCC-Ag level of the lung cancer patients was 1.4 ng/ml (0.9–2.9 ng/ml) in the derivation group (median, 25–75% percentiles) and 1.5 ng/ml (0.9–2.4 ng/ml) in the validation group, whereas the respective values of the healthy controls were 1 (0.6–1.3 ng/ml) and 0.8 ng/ml (0.6–1 ng/ml) (P<0.05). As expected, the serum SCC-Ag level decreased postoperatively to 0.65 (0.3–1 ng/ml) and 0.6 ng/ml (0.4–1 ng/ml) in the derivation and validation groups, respectively (P<0.05).

Discussion

The major findings of this study are, (1) SCC Ag serum level has moderate diagnostic role in NSCLC; (2) both the preoperative SCC-Ag serum level and its postoperative decrease have prognostic significance, yet inferior to the one provided by the disease stage and the patient's age.

References (12)

  • R.S. Lai et al.

    Cyfra 21-1 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Evaluation as a tumour marker in non-small cell lung cancer

    Chest

    (1996)
  • P.L. Cheah et al.

    Squamous cell carcinoma antigen as an adjunct tumour marker in primary carcinoma of the lung

    J. Clin. Pathol.

    (1994)
  • M. Diez et al.

    Prediction of survival and recurrence by serum and cytosolic levels of CEA, CA125 and SCC antigens in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

    Br. J. Cancer.

    (1996)
  • W. Ebert et al.

    Diagnostic validity of the SCC antigen assays in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

    J. Tumour Marker Oncol.

    (1988)
  • J.A. Hanley et al.

    The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve

    Radiology

    (1982)
  • A. Laupacis et al.

    Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications on methodological standards

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (54)

  • Metabolic biomarkers in cancer

    2023, Metabolomics: A Path Towards Personalized Medicine
  • Performance characteristics of an automated assay for the quantitation of CYFRA 21-1 in human serum

    2010, Clinical Biochemistry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Our data suggest that CYFRA 21-1 is complementary to both CEA and SCCa in a stage-dependent manner. We found that SCCa had limited clinical sensitivity, which is consistent with other reports of SCCa in NSCLC [6,25,26]. While none of the markers performed well when used alone, a panel consisting of these three markers had reasonably high sensitivity, particularly in late stage disease (70% in stage III and 95% in stage IV patients).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text